Cargando…

EGFR status in oral squamous cell carcinoma: comparing immunohistochemistry, FISH and CISH detection in a case series study

OBJECTIVES: To compare the immunohistochemistry (IHC) expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC) with the gene amplification evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) and their association wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bernardes, Vanessa Fátima, Gleber-Netto, Frederico Omar, de Sousa, Sílvia Ferreira, Rocha, Rafael Malagoli, de Aguiar, Maria Cássia Ferreira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3563135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23358562
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002077
_version_ 1782258154051993600
author Bernardes, Vanessa Fátima
Gleber-Netto, Frederico Omar
de Sousa, Sílvia Ferreira
Rocha, Rafael Malagoli
de Aguiar, Maria Cássia Ferreira
author_facet Bernardes, Vanessa Fátima
Gleber-Netto, Frederico Omar
de Sousa, Sílvia Ferreira
Rocha, Rafael Malagoli
de Aguiar, Maria Cássia Ferreira
author_sort Bernardes, Vanessa Fátima
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare the immunohistochemistry (IHC) expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC) with the gene amplification evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) and their association with clinicopathological parameters. Additionally, we tested the sensibility and specificity of CISH in comparison with FISH. DESIGN: Case series study SETTING: Oral surgery and pathology department in a school of dentistry. PARTICIPANTS: 52 patients with histopathological diagnosis of OSCC. METHODS: Tumour tissue samples from 52 patients with OSCC were evaluated by IHC, FISH and CISH using tissue microarray technology. Clinicopathological data from all patients were collected. RESULTS: EGFR+ rates were 53.8% (28/52) by IHC, 5.8% (3/52) by CISH and 15.4% (8/52) by FISH. Amplification detected by CISH and FISH with IHC negative occurred in 3.8% (2/52), and one case (1.9%) showed amplification detected by CISH and FISH and protein overexpression concomitantly. There were 9.6% FISH+ cases with IHC and CISH negative rates and 6/8 (75%) FISH+ and also EGFR+ cases; however, an association between protein expression and gene amplification was not found for both techniques. IHC and FISH rates were not associated with clinicopathological features. CISH+ rates were associated with T3–T4 status. Compared with FISH assay, CISH reached a sensitivity of 37.5% and specificity of 100%. CONCLUSIONS: There is no association between EGFR expression and gene amplification in OSCC when the IHC is driven to external epitopes of the protein. Although CISH demonstrates specificity, technical problems may influence sensibility when compared with FISH.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3563135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35631352013-02-05 EGFR status in oral squamous cell carcinoma: comparing immunohistochemistry, FISH and CISH detection in a case series study Bernardes, Vanessa Fátima Gleber-Netto, Frederico Omar de Sousa, Sílvia Ferreira Rocha, Rafael Malagoli de Aguiar, Maria Cássia Ferreira BMJ Open Dentistry and Oral Medicine OBJECTIVES: To compare the immunohistochemistry (IHC) expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC) with the gene amplification evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) and their association with clinicopathological parameters. Additionally, we tested the sensibility and specificity of CISH in comparison with FISH. DESIGN: Case series study SETTING: Oral surgery and pathology department in a school of dentistry. PARTICIPANTS: 52 patients with histopathological diagnosis of OSCC. METHODS: Tumour tissue samples from 52 patients with OSCC were evaluated by IHC, FISH and CISH using tissue microarray technology. Clinicopathological data from all patients were collected. RESULTS: EGFR+ rates were 53.8% (28/52) by IHC, 5.8% (3/52) by CISH and 15.4% (8/52) by FISH. Amplification detected by CISH and FISH with IHC negative occurred in 3.8% (2/52), and one case (1.9%) showed amplification detected by CISH and FISH and protein overexpression concomitantly. There were 9.6% FISH+ cases with IHC and CISH negative rates and 6/8 (75%) FISH+ and also EGFR+ cases; however, an association between protein expression and gene amplification was not found for both techniques. IHC and FISH rates were not associated with clinicopathological features. CISH+ rates were associated with T3–T4 status. Compared with FISH assay, CISH reached a sensitivity of 37.5% and specificity of 100%. CONCLUSIONS: There is no association between EGFR expression and gene amplification in OSCC when the IHC is driven to external epitopes of the protein. Although CISH demonstrates specificity, technical problems may influence sensibility when compared with FISH. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3563135/ /pubmed/23358562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002077 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Dentistry and Oral Medicine
Bernardes, Vanessa Fátima
Gleber-Netto, Frederico Omar
de Sousa, Sílvia Ferreira
Rocha, Rafael Malagoli
de Aguiar, Maria Cássia Ferreira
EGFR status in oral squamous cell carcinoma: comparing immunohistochemistry, FISH and CISH detection in a case series study
title EGFR status in oral squamous cell carcinoma: comparing immunohistochemistry, FISH and CISH detection in a case series study
title_full EGFR status in oral squamous cell carcinoma: comparing immunohistochemistry, FISH and CISH detection in a case series study
title_fullStr EGFR status in oral squamous cell carcinoma: comparing immunohistochemistry, FISH and CISH detection in a case series study
title_full_unstemmed EGFR status in oral squamous cell carcinoma: comparing immunohistochemistry, FISH and CISH detection in a case series study
title_short EGFR status in oral squamous cell carcinoma: comparing immunohistochemistry, FISH and CISH detection in a case series study
title_sort egfr status in oral squamous cell carcinoma: comparing immunohistochemistry, fish and cish detection in a case series study
topic Dentistry and Oral Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3563135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23358562
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002077
work_keys_str_mv AT bernardesvanessafatima egfrstatusinoralsquamouscellcarcinomacomparingimmunohistochemistryfishandcishdetectioninacaseseriesstudy
AT glebernettofredericoomar egfrstatusinoralsquamouscellcarcinomacomparingimmunohistochemistryfishandcishdetectioninacaseseriesstudy
AT desousasilviaferreira egfrstatusinoralsquamouscellcarcinomacomparingimmunohistochemistryfishandcishdetectioninacaseseriesstudy
AT rocharafaelmalagoli egfrstatusinoralsquamouscellcarcinomacomparingimmunohistochemistryfishandcishdetectioninacaseseriesstudy
AT deaguiarmariacassiaferreira egfrstatusinoralsquamouscellcarcinomacomparingimmunohistochemistryfishandcishdetectioninacaseseriesstudy