Cargando…
Evaluating the effectiveness of reasoning training in military and civilian chronic traumatic brain injury patients: study protocol
BACKGROUND: Individuals who sustain traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) often continue to experience significant impairment of cognitive functions mediated by the prefrontal cortex well into chronic stages of recovery. Traditional brain training programs that focus on improving specific skills fall shor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3563488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23363480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-29 |
_version_ | 1782258195365888000 |
---|---|
author | Krawczyk, Daniel C de la Plata, Carlos Marquez Schauer, Guido F Vas, Asha K Keebler, Molly Tuthill, Stephanie Gardner, Claire Jantz, Tiffani Yu, Weikei Chapman, Sandra B |
author_facet | Krawczyk, Daniel C de la Plata, Carlos Marquez Schauer, Guido F Vas, Asha K Keebler, Molly Tuthill, Stephanie Gardner, Claire Jantz, Tiffani Yu, Weikei Chapman, Sandra B |
author_sort | Krawczyk, Daniel C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Individuals who sustain traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) often continue to experience significant impairment of cognitive functions mediated by the prefrontal cortex well into chronic stages of recovery. Traditional brain training programs that focus on improving specific skills fall short of addressing integrative functions that draw upon multiple higher-order processes critical for social and vocational integration. In the current study, we compare the effects of two short-term, intensive, group-based cognitive rehabilitation programs for individuals with chronic TBI. One program emphasizes learning about brain functions and influences on cognition, while the other program adopts a top-down approach to improve abstract reasoning abilities that are largely reliant on the prefrontal cortex. These treatment programs are evaluated in civilian and military veteran TBI populations. METHODS/DESIGN: One hundred individuals are being enrolled in this double-blinded clinical trial (all measures and data analyses will be conducted by blinded raters and analysts). Each individual is randomly assigned to one of two treatment conditions, with each condition run in groups of five to seven individuals. The primary anticipated outcomes are improvement in abstract reasoning and everyday life functioning, measured through behavioral tasks and questionnaires, and attention modulation, as measured by functional neuroimaging. Secondary expected outcomes include improvements in the cognitive processes of working memory, attention, and inhibitory control. DISCUSSION: Results of this trial will determine whether cognitive rehabilitation aimed at teaching TBI-relevant information about the brain and cognition versus training in TBI-affected thinking abilities (e.g., memory, attention, and executive functioning) can improve outcomes in chronic military and civilian TBI patient populations. It should shed light on the nature of improvements and the characteristics of patients most likely to benefit. This trial will also provide information about the sustainability of treatment-related improvements 3 months post-training. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01552473 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3563488 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35634882013-02-08 Evaluating the effectiveness of reasoning training in military and civilian chronic traumatic brain injury patients: study protocol Krawczyk, Daniel C de la Plata, Carlos Marquez Schauer, Guido F Vas, Asha K Keebler, Molly Tuthill, Stephanie Gardner, Claire Jantz, Tiffani Yu, Weikei Chapman, Sandra B Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Individuals who sustain traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) often continue to experience significant impairment of cognitive functions mediated by the prefrontal cortex well into chronic stages of recovery. Traditional brain training programs that focus on improving specific skills fall short of addressing integrative functions that draw upon multiple higher-order processes critical for social and vocational integration. In the current study, we compare the effects of two short-term, intensive, group-based cognitive rehabilitation programs for individuals with chronic TBI. One program emphasizes learning about brain functions and influences on cognition, while the other program adopts a top-down approach to improve abstract reasoning abilities that are largely reliant on the prefrontal cortex. These treatment programs are evaluated in civilian and military veteran TBI populations. METHODS/DESIGN: One hundred individuals are being enrolled in this double-blinded clinical trial (all measures and data analyses will be conducted by blinded raters and analysts). Each individual is randomly assigned to one of two treatment conditions, with each condition run in groups of five to seven individuals. The primary anticipated outcomes are improvement in abstract reasoning and everyday life functioning, measured through behavioral tasks and questionnaires, and attention modulation, as measured by functional neuroimaging. Secondary expected outcomes include improvements in the cognitive processes of working memory, attention, and inhibitory control. DISCUSSION: Results of this trial will determine whether cognitive rehabilitation aimed at teaching TBI-relevant information about the brain and cognition versus training in TBI-affected thinking abilities (e.g., memory, attention, and executive functioning) can improve outcomes in chronic military and civilian TBI patient populations. It should shed light on the nature of improvements and the characteristics of patients most likely to benefit. This trial will also provide information about the sustainability of treatment-related improvements 3 months post-training. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01552473 BioMed Central 2013-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3563488/ /pubmed/23363480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-29 Text en Copyright ©2013 Krawczyk et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Krawczyk, Daniel C de la Plata, Carlos Marquez Schauer, Guido F Vas, Asha K Keebler, Molly Tuthill, Stephanie Gardner, Claire Jantz, Tiffani Yu, Weikei Chapman, Sandra B Evaluating the effectiveness of reasoning training in military and civilian chronic traumatic brain injury patients: study protocol |
title | Evaluating the effectiveness of reasoning training in military and civilian chronic traumatic brain injury patients: study protocol |
title_full | Evaluating the effectiveness of reasoning training in military and civilian chronic traumatic brain injury patients: study protocol |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the effectiveness of reasoning training in military and civilian chronic traumatic brain injury patients: study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the effectiveness of reasoning training in military and civilian chronic traumatic brain injury patients: study protocol |
title_short | Evaluating the effectiveness of reasoning training in military and civilian chronic traumatic brain injury patients: study protocol |
title_sort | evaluating the effectiveness of reasoning training in military and civilian chronic traumatic brain injury patients: study protocol |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3563488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23363480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-29 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krawczykdanielc evaluatingtheeffectivenessofreasoningtraininginmilitaryandcivilianchronictraumaticbraininjurypatientsstudyprotocol AT delaplatacarlosmarquez evaluatingtheeffectivenessofreasoningtraininginmilitaryandcivilianchronictraumaticbraininjurypatientsstudyprotocol AT schauerguidof evaluatingtheeffectivenessofreasoningtraininginmilitaryandcivilianchronictraumaticbraininjurypatientsstudyprotocol AT vasashak evaluatingtheeffectivenessofreasoningtraininginmilitaryandcivilianchronictraumaticbraininjurypatientsstudyprotocol AT keeblermolly evaluatingtheeffectivenessofreasoningtraininginmilitaryandcivilianchronictraumaticbraininjurypatientsstudyprotocol AT tuthillstephanie evaluatingtheeffectivenessofreasoningtraininginmilitaryandcivilianchronictraumaticbraininjurypatientsstudyprotocol AT gardnerclaire evaluatingtheeffectivenessofreasoningtraininginmilitaryandcivilianchronictraumaticbraininjurypatientsstudyprotocol AT jantztiffani evaluatingtheeffectivenessofreasoningtraininginmilitaryandcivilianchronictraumaticbraininjurypatientsstudyprotocol AT yuweikei evaluatingtheeffectivenessofreasoningtraininginmilitaryandcivilianchronictraumaticbraininjurypatientsstudyprotocol AT chapmansandrab evaluatingtheeffectivenessofreasoningtraininginmilitaryandcivilianchronictraumaticbraininjurypatientsstudyprotocol |