Cargando…

Evaluating the effectiveness of reasoning training in military and civilian chronic traumatic brain injury patients: study protocol

BACKGROUND: Individuals who sustain traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) often continue to experience significant impairment of cognitive functions mediated by the prefrontal cortex well into chronic stages of recovery. Traditional brain training programs that focus on improving specific skills fall shor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krawczyk, Daniel C, de la Plata, Carlos Marquez, Schauer, Guido F, Vas, Asha K, Keebler, Molly, Tuthill, Stephanie, Gardner, Claire, Jantz, Tiffani, Yu, Weikei, Chapman, Sandra B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3563488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23363480
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-29
_version_ 1782258195365888000
author Krawczyk, Daniel C
de la Plata, Carlos Marquez
Schauer, Guido F
Vas, Asha K
Keebler, Molly
Tuthill, Stephanie
Gardner, Claire
Jantz, Tiffani
Yu, Weikei
Chapman, Sandra B
author_facet Krawczyk, Daniel C
de la Plata, Carlos Marquez
Schauer, Guido F
Vas, Asha K
Keebler, Molly
Tuthill, Stephanie
Gardner, Claire
Jantz, Tiffani
Yu, Weikei
Chapman, Sandra B
author_sort Krawczyk, Daniel C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Individuals who sustain traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) often continue to experience significant impairment of cognitive functions mediated by the prefrontal cortex well into chronic stages of recovery. Traditional brain training programs that focus on improving specific skills fall short of addressing integrative functions that draw upon multiple higher-order processes critical for social and vocational integration. In the current study, we compare the effects of two short-term, intensive, group-based cognitive rehabilitation programs for individuals with chronic TBI. One program emphasizes learning about brain functions and influences on cognition, while the other program adopts a top-down approach to improve abstract reasoning abilities that are largely reliant on the prefrontal cortex. These treatment programs are evaluated in civilian and military veteran TBI populations. METHODS/DESIGN: One hundred individuals are being enrolled in this double-blinded clinical trial (all measures and data analyses will be conducted by blinded raters and analysts). Each individual is randomly assigned to one of two treatment conditions, with each condition run in groups of five to seven individuals. The primary anticipated outcomes are improvement in abstract reasoning and everyday life functioning, measured through behavioral tasks and questionnaires, and attention modulation, as measured by functional neuroimaging. Secondary expected outcomes include improvements in the cognitive processes of working memory, attention, and inhibitory control. DISCUSSION: Results of this trial will determine whether cognitive rehabilitation aimed at teaching TBI-relevant information about the brain and cognition versus training in TBI-affected thinking abilities (e.g., memory, attention, and executive functioning) can improve outcomes in chronic military and civilian TBI patient populations. It should shed light on the nature of improvements and the characteristics of patients most likely to benefit. This trial will also provide information about the sustainability of treatment-related improvements 3 months post-training. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01552473
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3563488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35634882013-02-08 Evaluating the effectiveness of reasoning training in military and civilian chronic traumatic brain injury patients: study protocol Krawczyk, Daniel C de la Plata, Carlos Marquez Schauer, Guido F Vas, Asha K Keebler, Molly Tuthill, Stephanie Gardner, Claire Jantz, Tiffani Yu, Weikei Chapman, Sandra B Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Individuals who sustain traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) often continue to experience significant impairment of cognitive functions mediated by the prefrontal cortex well into chronic stages of recovery. Traditional brain training programs that focus on improving specific skills fall short of addressing integrative functions that draw upon multiple higher-order processes critical for social and vocational integration. In the current study, we compare the effects of two short-term, intensive, group-based cognitive rehabilitation programs for individuals with chronic TBI. One program emphasizes learning about brain functions and influences on cognition, while the other program adopts a top-down approach to improve abstract reasoning abilities that are largely reliant on the prefrontal cortex. These treatment programs are evaluated in civilian and military veteran TBI populations. METHODS/DESIGN: One hundred individuals are being enrolled in this double-blinded clinical trial (all measures and data analyses will be conducted by blinded raters and analysts). Each individual is randomly assigned to one of two treatment conditions, with each condition run in groups of five to seven individuals. The primary anticipated outcomes are improvement in abstract reasoning and everyday life functioning, measured through behavioral tasks and questionnaires, and attention modulation, as measured by functional neuroimaging. Secondary expected outcomes include improvements in the cognitive processes of working memory, attention, and inhibitory control. DISCUSSION: Results of this trial will determine whether cognitive rehabilitation aimed at teaching TBI-relevant information about the brain and cognition versus training in TBI-affected thinking abilities (e.g., memory, attention, and executive functioning) can improve outcomes in chronic military and civilian TBI patient populations. It should shed light on the nature of improvements and the characteristics of patients most likely to benefit. This trial will also provide information about the sustainability of treatment-related improvements 3 months post-training. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01552473 BioMed Central 2013-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3563488/ /pubmed/23363480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-29 Text en Copyright ©2013 Krawczyk et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Krawczyk, Daniel C
de la Plata, Carlos Marquez
Schauer, Guido F
Vas, Asha K
Keebler, Molly
Tuthill, Stephanie
Gardner, Claire
Jantz, Tiffani
Yu, Weikei
Chapman, Sandra B
Evaluating the effectiveness of reasoning training in military and civilian chronic traumatic brain injury patients: study protocol
title Evaluating the effectiveness of reasoning training in military and civilian chronic traumatic brain injury patients: study protocol
title_full Evaluating the effectiveness of reasoning training in military and civilian chronic traumatic brain injury patients: study protocol
title_fullStr Evaluating the effectiveness of reasoning training in military and civilian chronic traumatic brain injury patients: study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the effectiveness of reasoning training in military and civilian chronic traumatic brain injury patients: study protocol
title_short Evaluating the effectiveness of reasoning training in military and civilian chronic traumatic brain injury patients: study protocol
title_sort evaluating the effectiveness of reasoning training in military and civilian chronic traumatic brain injury patients: study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3563488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23363480
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-29
work_keys_str_mv AT krawczykdanielc evaluatingtheeffectivenessofreasoningtraininginmilitaryandcivilianchronictraumaticbraininjurypatientsstudyprotocol
AT delaplatacarlosmarquez evaluatingtheeffectivenessofreasoningtraininginmilitaryandcivilianchronictraumaticbraininjurypatientsstudyprotocol
AT schauerguidof evaluatingtheeffectivenessofreasoningtraininginmilitaryandcivilianchronictraumaticbraininjurypatientsstudyprotocol
AT vasashak evaluatingtheeffectivenessofreasoningtraininginmilitaryandcivilianchronictraumaticbraininjurypatientsstudyprotocol
AT keeblermolly evaluatingtheeffectivenessofreasoningtraininginmilitaryandcivilianchronictraumaticbraininjurypatientsstudyprotocol
AT tuthillstephanie evaluatingtheeffectivenessofreasoningtraininginmilitaryandcivilianchronictraumaticbraininjurypatientsstudyprotocol
AT gardnerclaire evaluatingtheeffectivenessofreasoningtraininginmilitaryandcivilianchronictraumaticbraininjurypatientsstudyprotocol
AT jantztiffani evaluatingtheeffectivenessofreasoningtraininginmilitaryandcivilianchronictraumaticbraininjurypatientsstudyprotocol
AT yuweikei evaluatingtheeffectivenessofreasoningtraininginmilitaryandcivilianchronictraumaticbraininjurypatientsstudyprotocol
AT chapmansandrab evaluatingtheeffectivenessofreasoningtraininginmilitaryandcivilianchronictraumaticbraininjurypatientsstudyprotocol