Cargando…

Stochastic dynamics of virus capsid formation: direct versus hierarchical self-assembly

BACKGROUND: In order to replicate within their cellular host, many viruses have developed self-assembly strategies for their capsids which are sufficiently robust as to be reconstituted in vitro. Mathematical models for virus self-assembly usually assume that the bonds leading to cluster formation h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baschek, Johanna E, R Klein, Heinrich C, Schwarz, Ulrich S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3563543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23244740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-1682-5-22
_version_ 1782258208473088000
author Baschek, Johanna E
R Klein, Heinrich C
Schwarz, Ulrich S
author_facet Baschek, Johanna E
R Klein, Heinrich C
Schwarz, Ulrich S
author_sort Baschek, Johanna E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In order to replicate within their cellular host, many viruses have developed self-assembly strategies for their capsids which are sufficiently robust as to be reconstituted in vitro. Mathematical models for virus self-assembly usually assume that the bonds leading to cluster formation have constant reactivity over the time course of assembly (direct assembly). In some cases, however, binding sites between the capsomers have been reported to be activated during the self-assembly process (hierarchical assembly). RESULTS: In order to study possible advantages of such hierarchical schemes for icosahedral virus capsid assembly, we use Brownian dynamics simulations of a patchy particle model that allows us to switch binding sites on and off during assembly. For T1 viruses, we implement a hierarchical assembly scheme where inter-capsomer bonds become active only if a complete pentamer has been assembled. We find direct assembly to be favorable for reversible bonds allowing for repeated structural reorganizations, while hierarchical assembly is favorable for strong bonds with small dissociation rate, as this situation is less prone to kinetic trapping. However, at the same time it is more vulnerable to monomer starvation during the final phase. Increasing the number of initial monomers does have only a weak effect on these general features. The differences between the two assembly schemes become more pronounced for more complex virus geometries, as shown here for T3 viruses, which assemble through homogeneous pentamers and heterogeneous hexamers in the hierarchical scheme. In order to complement the simulations for this more complicated case, we introduce a master equation approach that agrees well with the simulation results. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis shows for which molecular parameters hierarchical assembly schemes can outperform direct ones and suggests that viruses with high bond stability might prefer hierarchical assembly schemes. These insights increase our physical understanding of an essential biological process, with many interesting potential applications in medicine and materials science.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3563543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35635432013-02-08 Stochastic dynamics of virus capsid formation: direct versus hierarchical self-assembly Baschek, Johanna E R Klein, Heinrich C Schwarz, Ulrich S BMC Biophys Research Article BACKGROUND: In order to replicate within their cellular host, many viruses have developed self-assembly strategies for their capsids which are sufficiently robust as to be reconstituted in vitro. Mathematical models for virus self-assembly usually assume that the bonds leading to cluster formation have constant reactivity over the time course of assembly (direct assembly). In some cases, however, binding sites between the capsomers have been reported to be activated during the self-assembly process (hierarchical assembly). RESULTS: In order to study possible advantages of such hierarchical schemes for icosahedral virus capsid assembly, we use Brownian dynamics simulations of a patchy particle model that allows us to switch binding sites on and off during assembly. For T1 viruses, we implement a hierarchical assembly scheme where inter-capsomer bonds become active only if a complete pentamer has been assembled. We find direct assembly to be favorable for reversible bonds allowing for repeated structural reorganizations, while hierarchical assembly is favorable for strong bonds with small dissociation rate, as this situation is less prone to kinetic trapping. However, at the same time it is more vulnerable to monomer starvation during the final phase. Increasing the number of initial monomers does have only a weak effect on these general features. The differences between the two assembly schemes become more pronounced for more complex virus geometries, as shown here for T3 viruses, which assemble through homogeneous pentamers and heterogeneous hexamers in the hierarchical scheme. In order to complement the simulations for this more complicated case, we introduce a master equation approach that agrees well with the simulation results. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis shows for which molecular parameters hierarchical assembly schemes can outperform direct ones and suggests that viruses with high bond stability might prefer hierarchical assembly schemes. These insights increase our physical understanding of an essential biological process, with many interesting potential applications in medicine and materials science. BioMed Central 2012-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3563543/ /pubmed/23244740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-1682-5-22 Text en Copyright ©2012 Baschek et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Baschek, Johanna E
R Klein, Heinrich C
Schwarz, Ulrich S
Stochastic dynamics of virus capsid formation: direct versus hierarchical self-assembly
title Stochastic dynamics of virus capsid formation: direct versus hierarchical self-assembly
title_full Stochastic dynamics of virus capsid formation: direct versus hierarchical self-assembly
title_fullStr Stochastic dynamics of virus capsid formation: direct versus hierarchical self-assembly
title_full_unstemmed Stochastic dynamics of virus capsid formation: direct versus hierarchical self-assembly
title_short Stochastic dynamics of virus capsid formation: direct versus hierarchical self-assembly
title_sort stochastic dynamics of virus capsid formation: direct versus hierarchical self-assembly
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3563543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23244740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-1682-5-22
work_keys_str_mv AT baschekjohannae stochasticdynamicsofviruscapsidformationdirectversushierarchicalselfassembly
AT rkleinheinrichc stochasticdynamicsofviruscapsidformationdirectversushierarchicalselfassembly
AT schwarzulrichs stochasticdynamicsofviruscapsidformationdirectversushierarchicalselfassembly