Cargando…

Conserving the Birds of Uganda’s Banana-Coffee Arc: Land Sparing and Land Sharing Compared

Reconciling the aims of feeding an ever more demanding human population and conserving biodiversity is a difficult challenge. Here, we explore potential solutions by assessing whether land sparing (farming for high yield, potentially enabling the protection of non-farmland habitat), land sharing (lo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hulme, Mark F., Vickery, Juliet A., Green, Rhys E., Phalan, Ben, Chamberlain, Dan E., Pomeroy, Derek E., Nalwanga, Dianah, Mushabe, David, Katebaka, Raymond, Bolwig, Simon, Atkinson, Philip W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3563584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23390501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054597
_version_ 1782258218306633728
author Hulme, Mark F.
Vickery, Juliet A.
Green, Rhys E.
Phalan, Ben
Chamberlain, Dan E.
Pomeroy, Derek E.
Nalwanga, Dianah
Mushabe, David
Katebaka, Raymond
Bolwig, Simon
Atkinson, Philip W.
author_facet Hulme, Mark F.
Vickery, Juliet A.
Green, Rhys E.
Phalan, Ben
Chamberlain, Dan E.
Pomeroy, Derek E.
Nalwanga, Dianah
Mushabe, David
Katebaka, Raymond
Bolwig, Simon
Atkinson, Philip W.
author_sort Hulme, Mark F.
collection PubMed
description Reconciling the aims of feeding an ever more demanding human population and conserving biodiversity is a difficult challenge. Here, we explore potential solutions by assessing whether land sparing (farming for high yield, potentially enabling the protection of non-farmland habitat), land sharing (lower yielding farming with more biodiversity within farmland) or a mixed strategy would result in better bird conservation outcomes for a specified level of agricultural production. We surveyed forest and farmland study areas in southern Uganda, measuring the population density of 256 bird species and agricultural yield: food energy and gross income. Parametric non-linear functions relating density to yield were fitted. Species were identified as “winners” (total population size always at least as great with agriculture present as without it) or “losers” (total population sometimes or always reduced with agriculture present) for a range of targets for total agricultural production. For each target we determined whether each species would be predicted to have a higher total population with land sparing, land sharing or with any intermediate level of sparing at an intermediate yield. We found that most species were expected to have their highest total populations with land sparing, particularly loser species and species with small global range sizes. Hence, more species would benefit from high-yield farming if used as part of a strategy to reduce forest loss than from low-yield farming and land sharing, as has been found in Ghana and India in a previous study. We caution against advocacy for high-yield farming alone as a means to deliver land sparing if it is done without strong protection for natural habitats, other ecosystem services and social welfare. Instead, we suggest that conservationists explore how conservation and agricultural policies can be better integrated to deliver land sparing by, for example, combining land-use planning and agronomic support for small farmers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3563584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35635842013-02-06 Conserving the Birds of Uganda’s Banana-Coffee Arc: Land Sparing and Land Sharing Compared Hulme, Mark F. Vickery, Juliet A. Green, Rhys E. Phalan, Ben Chamberlain, Dan E. Pomeroy, Derek E. Nalwanga, Dianah Mushabe, David Katebaka, Raymond Bolwig, Simon Atkinson, Philip W. PLoS One Research Article Reconciling the aims of feeding an ever more demanding human population and conserving biodiversity is a difficult challenge. Here, we explore potential solutions by assessing whether land sparing (farming for high yield, potentially enabling the protection of non-farmland habitat), land sharing (lower yielding farming with more biodiversity within farmland) or a mixed strategy would result in better bird conservation outcomes for a specified level of agricultural production. We surveyed forest and farmland study areas in southern Uganda, measuring the population density of 256 bird species and agricultural yield: food energy and gross income. Parametric non-linear functions relating density to yield were fitted. Species were identified as “winners” (total population size always at least as great with agriculture present as without it) or “losers” (total population sometimes or always reduced with agriculture present) for a range of targets for total agricultural production. For each target we determined whether each species would be predicted to have a higher total population with land sparing, land sharing or with any intermediate level of sparing at an intermediate yield. We found that most species were expected to have their highest total populations with land sparing, particularly loser species and species with small global range sizes. Hence, more species would benefit from high-yield farming if used as part of a strategy to reduce forest loss than from low-yield farming and land sharing, as has been found in Ghana and India in a previous study. We caution against advocacy for high-yield farming alone as a means to deliver land sparing if it is done without strong protection for natural habitats, other ecosystem services and social welfare. Instead, we suggest that conservationists explore how conservation and agricultural policies can be better integrated to deliver land sparing by, for example, combining land-use planning and agronomic support for small farmers. Public Library of Science 2013-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3563584/ /pubmed/23390501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054597 Text en © 2013 Hulme et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hulme, Mark F.
Vickery, Juliet A.
Green, Rhys E.
Phalan, Ben
Chamberlain, Dan E.
Pomeroy, Derek E.
Nalwanga, Dianah
Mushabe, David
Katebaka, Raymond
Bolwig, Simon
Atkinson, Philip W.
Conserving the Birds of Uganda’s Banana-Coffee Arc: Land Sparing and Land Sharing Compared
title Conserving the Birds of Uganda’s Banana-Coffee Arc: Land Sparing and Land Sharing Compared
title_full Conserving the Birds of Uganda’s Banana-Coffee Arc: Land Sparing and Land Sharing Compared
title_fullStr Conserving the Birds of Uganda’s Banana-Coffee Arc: Land Sparing and Land Sharing Compared
title_full_unstemmed Conserving the Birds of Uganda’s Banana-Coffee Arc: Land Sparing and Land Sharing Compared
title_short Conserving the Birds of Uganda’s Banana-Coffee Arc: Land Sparing and Land Sharing Compared
title_sort conserving the birds of uganda’s banana-coffee arc: land sparing and land sharing compared
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3563584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23390501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054597
work_keys_str_mv AT hulmemarkf conservingthebirdsofugandasbananacoffeearclandsparingandlandsharingcompared
AT vickeryjulieta conservingthebirdsofugandasbananacoffeearclandsparingandlandsharingcompared
AT greenrhyse conservingthebirdsofugandasbananacoffeearclandsparingandlandsharingcompared
AT phalanben conservingthebirdsofugandasbananacoffeearclandsparingandlandsharingcompared
AT chamberlaindane conservingthebirdsofugandasbananacoffeearclandsparingandlandsharingcompared
AT pomeroydereke conservingthebirdsofugandasbananacoffeearclandsparingandlandsharingcompared
AT nalwangadianah conservingthebirdsofugandasbananacoffeearclandsparingandlandsharingcompared
AT mushabedavid conservingthebirdsofugandasbananacoffeearclandsparingandlandsharingcompared
AT katebakaraymond conservingthebirdsofugandasbananacoffeearclandsparingandlandsharingcompared
AT bolwigsimon conservingthebirdsofugandasbananacoffeearclandsparingandlandsharingcompared
AT atkinsonphilipw conservingthebirdsofugandasbananacoffeearclandsparingandlandsharingcompared