Cargando…

Copy Number Variation detection from 1000 Genomes project exon capture sequencing data

BACKGROUND: DNA capture technologies combined with high-throughput sequencing now enable cost-effective, deep-coverage, targeted sequencing of complete exomes. This is well suited for SNP discovery and genotyping. However there has been little attention devoted to Copy Number Variation (CNV) detecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Jiantao, Grzeda, Krzysztof R, Stewart, Chip, Grubert, Fabian, Urban, Alexander E, Snyder, Michael P, Marth, Gabor T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3563612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23157288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-305
_version_ 1782258225088823296
author Wu, Jiantao
Grzeda, Krzysztof R
Stewart, Chip
Grubert, Fabian
Urban, Alexander E
Snyder, Michael P
Marth, Gabor T
author_facet Wu, Jiantao
Grzeda, Krzysztof R
Stewart, Chip
Grubert, Fabian
Urban, Alexander E
Snyder, Michael P
Marth, Gabor T
author_sort Wu, Jiantao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: DNA capture technologies combined with high-throughput sequencing now enable cost-effective, deep-coverage, targeted sequencing of complete exomes. This is well suited for SNP discovery and genotyping. However there has been little attention devoted to Copy Number Variation (CNV) detection from exome capture datasets despite the potentially high impact of CNVs in exonic regions on protein function. RESULTS: As members of the 1000 Genomes Project analysis effort, we investigated 697 samples in which 931 genes were targeted and sampled with 454 or Illumina paired-end sequencing. We developed a rigorous Bayesian method to detect CNVs in the genes, based on read depth within target regions. Despite substantial variability in read coverage across samples and targeted exons, we were able to identify 107 heterozygous deletions in the dataset. The experimentally determined false discovery rate (FDR) of the cleanest dataset from the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is 12.5%. We were able to substantially improve the FDR in a subset of gene deletion candidates that were adjacent to another gene deletion call (17 calls). The estimated sensitivity of our call-set was 45%. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that exonic sequencing datasets, collected both in population based and medical sequencing projects, will be a useful substrate for detecting genic CNV events, particularly deletions. Based on the number of events we found and the sensitivity of the methods in the present dataset, we estimate on average 16 genic heterozygous deletions per individual genome. Our power analysis informs ongoing and future projects about sequencing depth and uniformity of read coverage required for efficient detection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3563612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35636122013-02-08 Copy Number Variation detection from 1000 Genomes project exon capture sequencing data Wu, Jiantao Grzeda, Krzysztof R Stewart, Chip Grubert, Fabian Urban, Alexander E Snyder, Michael P Marth, Gabor T BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: DNA capture technologies combined with high-throughput sequencing now enable cost-effective, deep-coverage, targeted sequencing of complete exomes. This is well suited for SNP discovery and genotyping. However there has been little attention devoted to Copy Number Variation (CNV) detection from exome capture datasets despite the potentially high impact of CNVs in exonic regions on protein function. RESULTS: As members of the 1000 Genomes Project analysis effort, we investigated 697 samples in which 931 genes were targeted and sampled with 454 or Illumina paired-end sequencing. We developed a rigorous Bayesian method to detect CNVs in the genes, based on read depth within target regions. Despite substantial variability in read coverage across samples and targeted exons, we were able to identify 107 heterozygous deletions in the dataset. The experimentally determined false discovery rate (FDR) of the cleanest dataset from the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is 12.5%. We were able to substantially improve the FDR in a subset of gene deletion candidates that were adjacent to another gene deletion call (17 calls). The estimated sensitivity of our call-set was 45%. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that exonic sequencing datasets, collected both in population based and medical sequencing projects, will be a useful substrate for detecting genic CNV events, particularly deletions. Based on the number of events we found and the sensitivity of the methods in the present dataset, we estimate on average 16 genic heterozygous deletions per individual genome. Our power analysis informs ongoing and future projects about sequencing depth and uniformity of read coverage required for efficient detection. BioMed Central 2012-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3563612/ /pubmed/23157288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-305 Text en Copyright ©2012 Wu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Wu, Jiantao
Grzeda, Krzysztof R
Stewart, Chip
Grubert, Fabian
Urban, Alexander E
Snyder, Michael P
Marth, Gabor T
Copy Number Variation detection from 1000 Genomes project exon capture sequencing data
title Copy Number Variation detection from 1000 Genomes project exon capture sequencing data
title_full Copy Number Variation detection from 1000 Genomes project exon capture sequencing data
title_fullStr Copy Number Variation detection from 1000 Genomes project exon capture sequencing data
title_full_unstemmed Copy Number Variation detection from 1000 Genomes project exon capture sequencing data
title_short Copy Number Variation detection from 1000 Genomes project exon capture sequencing data
title_sort copy number variation detection from 1000 genomes project exon capture sequencing data
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3563612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23157288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-305
work_keys_str_mv AT wujiantao copynumbervariationdetectionfrom1000genomesprojectexoncapturesequencingdata
AT grzedakrzysztofr copynumbervariationdetectionfrom1000genomesprojectexoncapturesequencingdata
AT stewartchip copynumbervariationdetectionfrom1000genomesprojectexoncapturesequencingdata
AT grubertfabian copynumbervariationdetectionfrom1000genomesprojectexoncapturesequencingdata
AT urbanalexandere copynumbervariationdetectionfrom1000genomesprojectexoncapturesequencingdata
AT snydermichaelp copynumbervariationdetectionfrom1000genomesprojectexoncapturesequencingdata
AT marthgabort copynumbervariationdetectionfrom1000genomesprojectexoncapturesequencingdata