Cargando…

Comparison of Five Parathyroid Scintigraphic Protocols

Objectives. We compared five parathyroid scintigraphy protocols in patients with primary (pHPT) and secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT) and studied the interobserver agreement. The dual-tracer method ((99m)Tc-sestamibi/(123)I) was used with three acquisition techniques (parallel-hole planar, pinhol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tunninen, Virpi, Varjo, Pekka, Schildt, Jukka, Ahonen, Aapo, Kauppinen, Tomi, Lisinen, Irina, Holm, Anu, Eskola, Hannu, Seppänen, Marko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3564434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23431436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/921260
_version_ 1782258315514871808
author Tunninen, Virpi
Varjo, Pekka
Schildt, Jukka
Ahonen, Aapo
Kauppinen, Tomi
Lisinen, Irina
Holm, Anu
Eskola, Hannu
Seppänen, Marko
author_facet Tunninen, Virpi
Varjo, Pekka
Schildt, Jukka
Ahonen, Aapo
Kauppinen, Tomi
Lisinen, Irina
Holm, Anu
Eskola, Hannu
Seppänen, Marko
author_sort Tunninen, Virpi
collection PubMed
description Objectives. We compared five parathyroid scintigraphy protocols in patients with primary (pHPT) and secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT) and studied the interobserver agreement. The dual-tracer method ((99m)Tc-sestamibi/(123)I) was used with three acquisition techniques (parallel-hole planar, pinhole planar, and SPECT/CT). The single-tracer method ((99m)Tc-sestamibi) was used with two acquisition techniques (double-phase parallel-hole planar, and SPECT/CT). Thus five protocols were used, resulting in five sets of images. Materials and Methods. Image sets of 51 patients were retrospectively graded by four experienced nuclear medicine physicians. The final study group consisted of 24 patients (21 pHPT, 3 sHPT) who had been operated upon. Surgical and histopathologic findings were used as the standard of comparison. Results. Thirty abnormal parathyroid glands were found in 24 patients. The sensitivities of the dual-tracer method (76.7–80.0%) were similar (P = 1.0). The sensitivities of the single-tracer method (13.3–31.6%) were similar (P = 0.625). All differences in sensitivity between these two methods were statistically significant (P < 0.012). The interobserver agreement was good. Conclusion. This study indicates that any dual-tracer protocol with (99m)Tc-sestamibi and (123)I is superior for enlarged parathyroid gland localization when compared with single-tracer protocols using (99m)Tc-sestamibi alone. The parathyroid scintigraphy was found to be independent of the reporter.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3564434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35644342013-02-21 Comparison of Five Parathyroid Scintigraphic Protocols Tunninen, Virpi Varjo, Pekka Schildt, Jukka Ahonen, Aapo Kauppinen, Tomi Lisinen, Irina Holm, Anu Eskola, Hannu Seppänen, Marko Int J Mol Imaging Clinical Study Objectives. We compared five parathyroid scintigraphy protocols in patients with primary (pHPT) and secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT) and studied the interobserver agreement. The dual-tracer method ((99m)Tc-sestamibi/(123)I) was used with three acquisition techniques (parallel-hole planar, pinhole planar, and SPECT/CT). The single-tracer method ((99m)Tc-sestamibi) was used with two acquisition techniques (double-phase parallel-hole planar, and SPECT/CT). Thus five protocols were used, resulting in five sets of images. Materials and Methods. Image sets of 51 patients were retrospectively graded by four experienced nuclear medicine physicians. The final study group consisted of 24 patients (21 pHPT, 3 sHPT) who had been operated upon. Surgical and histopathologic findings were used as the standard of comparison. Results. Thirty abnormal parathyroid glands were found in 24 patients. The sensitivities of the dual-tracer method (76.7–80.0%) were similar (P = 1.0). The sensitivities of the single-tracer method (13.3–31.6%) were similar (P = 0.625). All differences in sensitivity between these two methods were statistically significant (P < 0.012). The interobserver agreement was good. Conclusion. This study indicates that any dual-tracer protocol with (99m)Tc-sestamibi and (123)I is superior for enlarged parathyroid gland localization when compared with single-tracer protocols using (99m)Tc-sestamibi alone. The parathyroid scintigraphy was found to be independent of the reporter. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3564434/ /pubmed/23431436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/921260 Text en Copyright © 2013 Virpi Tunninen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Tunninen, Virpi
Varjo, Pekka
Schildt, Jukka
Ahonen, Aapo
Kauppinen, Tomi
Lisinen, Irina
Holm, Anu
Eskola, Hannu
Seppänen, Marko
Comparison of Five Parathyroid Scintigraphic Protocols
title Comparison of Five Parathyroid Scintigraphic Protocols
title_full Comparison of Five Parathyroid Scintigraphic Protocols
title_fullStr Comparison of Five Parathyroid Scintigraphic Protocols
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Five Parathyroid Scintigraphic Protocols
title_short Comparison of Five Parathyroid Scintigraphic Protocols
title_sort comparison of five parathyroid scintigraphic protocols
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3564434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23431436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/921260
work_keys_str_mv AT tunninenvirpi comparisonoffiveparathyroidscintigraphicprotocols
AT varjopekka comparisonoffiveparathyroidscintigraphicprotocols
AT schildtjukka comparisonoffiveparathyroidscintigraphicprotocols
AT ahonenaapo comparisonoffiveparathyroidscintigraphicprotocols
AT kauppinentomi comparisonoffiveparathyroidscintigraphicprotocols
AT lisinenirina comparisonoffiveparathyroidscintigraphicprotocols
AT holmanu comparisonoffiveparathyroidscintigraphicprotocols
AT eskolahannu comparisonoffiveparathyroidscintigraphicprotocols
AT seppanenmarko comparisonoffiveparathyroidscintigraphicprotocols