Cargando…

Assessment of health-related quality of life in Turkish patients with facial prostheses

BACKGROUND: Facial prostheses are intended to provide a non-operative rehabilitation for patients with acquired facial defects. By improving aesthetics and quality of life (QOL), this treatment involves reintegration of the patient into family and social life. The aim of this study was to evaluate t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Atay, Arzu, Peker, Kadriye, Günay, Yumushan, Ebrinç, Servet, Karayazgan, Banu, Uysal, Ömer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3564838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23351906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-11
_version_ 1782258367627001856
author Atay, Arzu
Peker, Kadriye
Günay, Yumushan
Ebrinç, Servet
Karayazgan, Banu
Uysal, Ömer
author_facet Atay, Arzu
Peker, Kadriye
Günay, Yumushan
Ebrinç, Servet
Karayazgan, Banu
Uysal, Ömer
author_sort Atay, Arzu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Facial prostheses are intended to provide a non-operative rehabilitation for patients with acquired facial defects. By improving aesthetics and quality of life (QOL), this treatment involves reintegration of the patient into family and social life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the perception of QOL in adult patients with facial prostheses and to compare this perception with that of a control group. METHODS: The study participants consisted of 72 patients, who were divided into three equal-sized groups according to the type of prosthesis (OP- orbital prosthesis, AP- auricular prosthesis, NP - nasal prosthesis) and 24 healthy control participants without any congenital or acquired deformity of face or body. Clinical and socio-demographic data were gathered from each person’s medical chart. Participants completed the Turkish version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument, Short Form (WHOQOL-BREF). Descriptive statistics, independent sample t-tests, Pearson's chi-square test, ANOVA, ANCOVA, and Pearson correlation were used to analyse the data. RESULTS: Compared with the control participants, patients with NP scored lower on the all domains of QOL and all three patient groups had lower scores on overall QOL and its domains of physical and environmental health. Patients with OP reported significantly lower physical health scores than those with AP, while patients with NP reported significantly lower overall QOL and psychological health scores than those with AP. Female patients had lower environmental domain scores than did male patients. The patient’s age and income correlated with social relationships QOL, while the patient’s income and the age of facial prosthesis were correlated with environmental QOL. CONCLUSION: Patients with facial prostheses had lower scores in overall QOL, physical and environmental health domains than the control participants. Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics such as age, gender, income, localization of the defect, and age of facial prosthesis were associated with patients’ QOL. These findings may provide valuable information about the specific health needs of these patients that may affect their well-being. Further studies are needed to confirm these results. Use of the WHOQOL-BREF may provide valuable information for determining patients’ needs and priorities as well as for planning and developing comprehensive prosthetic rehabilitation programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3564838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35648382013-02-08 Assessment of health-related quality of life in Turkish patients with facial prostheses Atay, Arzu Peker, Kadriye Günay, Yumushan Ebrinç, Servet Karayazgan, Banu Uysal, Ömer Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Facial prostheses are intended to provide a non-operative rehabilitation for patients with acquired facial defects. By improving aesthetics and quality of life (QOL), this treatment involves reintegration of the patient into family and social life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the perception of QOL in adult patients with facial prostheses and to compare this perception with that of a control group. METHODS: The study participants consisted of 72 patients, who were divided into three equal-sized groups according to the type of prosthesis (OP- orbital prosthesis, AP- auricular prosthesis, NP - nasal prosthesis) and 24 healthy control participants without any congenital or acquired deformity of face or body. Clinical and socio-demographic data were gathered from each person’s medical chart. Participants completed the Turkish version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument, Short Form (WHOQOL-BREF). Descriptive statistics, independent sample t-tests, Pearson's chi-square test, ANOVA, ANCOVA, and Pearson correlation were used to analyse the data. RESULTS: Compared with the control participants, patients with NP scored lower on the all domains of QOL and all three patient groups had lower scores on overall QOL and its domains of physical and environmental health. Patients with OP reported significantly lower physical health scores than those with AP, while patients with NP reported significantly lower overall QOL and psychological health scores than those with AP. Female patients had lower environmental domain scores than did male patients. The patient’s age and income correlated with social relationships QOL, while the patient’s income and the age of facial prosthesis were correlated with environmental QOL. CONCLUSION: Patients with facial prostheses had lower scores in overall QOL, physical and environmental health domains than the control participants. Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics such as age, gender, income, localization of the defect, and age of facial prosthesis were associated with patients’ QOL. These findings may provide valuable information about the specific health needs of these patients that may affect their well-being. Further studies are needed to confirm these results. Use of the WHOQOL-BREF may provide valuable information for determining patients’ needs and priorities as well as for planning and developing comprehensive prosthetic rehabilitation programs. BioMed Central 2013-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3564838/ /pubmed/23351906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-11 Text en Copyright ©2013 Atay et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Atay, Arzu
Peker, Kadriye
Günay, Yumushan
Ebrinç, Servet
Karayazgan, Banu
Uysal, Ömer
Assessment of health-related quality of life in Turkish patients with facial prostheses
title Assessment of health-related quality of life in Turkish patients with facial prostheses
title_full Assessment of health-related quality of life in Turkish patients with facial prostheses
title_fullStr Assessment of health-related quality of life in Turkish patients with facial prostheses
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of health-related quality of life in Turkish patients with facial prostheses
title_short Assessment of health-related quality of life in Turkish patients with facial prostheses
title_sort assessment of health-related quality of life in turkish patients with facial prostheses
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3564838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23351906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-11
work_keys_str_mv AT atayarzu assessmentofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinturkishpatientswithfacialprostheses
AT pekerkadriye assessmentofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinturkishpatientswithfacialprostheses
AT gunayyumushan assessmentofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinturkishpatientswithfacialprostheses
AT ebrincservet assessmentofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinturkishpatientswithfacialprostheses
AT karayazganbanu assessmentofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinturkishpatientswithfacialprostheses
AT uysalomer assessmentofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinturkishpatientswithfacialprostheses