Cargando…

Periosteal Augmentation of Allograft Bone and its Effect on Implant Fixation - An Experimental Study on 12 Dogs()

PURPOSE: Periosteum provides essential cellular and biological components necessary for fracture healing and bone repair. We hypothesized that augmenting allograft bone by adding fragmented autologous periosteum would improve fixation of grafted implants. METHODS: In each of twelve dogs, we implante...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barckman, Jeppe, Baas, Jorgen, Sørensen, Mette, Bechtold, Joan E, Soballe, Kjeld
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3565231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23400644
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001307010018
_version_ 1782258422416146432
author Barckman, Jeppe
Baas, Jorgen
Sørensen, Mette
Bechtold, Joan E
Soballe, Kjeld
author_facet Barckman, Jeppe
Baas, Jorgen
Sørensen, Mette
Bechtold, Joan E
Soballe, Kjeld
author_sort Barckman, Jeppe
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Periosteum provides essential cellular and biological components necessary for fracture healing and bone repair. We hypothesized that augmenting allograft bone by adding fragmented autologous periosteum would improve fixation of grafted implants. METHODS: In each of twelve dogs, we implanted two unloaded cylindrical (10 mm x 6 mm) titanium implants into the distal femur. The implants were surrounded by a 2.5-mm gap into which morselized allograft bone with or without addition of fragmented autologous periosteum was impacted. After four weeks, the animals were euthanized and the implants were evaluated by histomorphometric analysis and mechanical push-out test. RESULTS: Although less new bone was found on the implant surface and increased volume of fibrous tissue was present in the gap around the implant, no difference was found between treatment groups regarding the mechanical parameters. Increased new bone formation was observed in the immediate vicinity of the periosteum fragments within the bone graft. CONCLUSION: The method for periosteal augmentation used in this study did not alter the mechanical fixation although osseointegration was impaired. The observed activity of new bone formation at the boundary of the periosteum fragments may indicate maintained bone stimulating properties of the transplanted cambium layer. Augmenting the bone graft by smaller fragments of periosteum, isolated cambium layer tissue or cultured periosteal cells could be studied in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3565231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35652312013-02-11 Periosteal Augmentation of Allograft Bone and its Effect on Implant Fixation - An Experimental Study on 12 Dogs() Barckman, Jeppe Baas, Jorgen Sørensen, Mette Bechtold, Joan E Soballe, Kjeld Open Orthop J Article PURPOSE: Periosteum provides essential cellular and biological components necessary for fracture healing and bone repair. We hypothesized that augmenting allograft bone by adding fragmented autologous periosteum would improve fixation of grafted implants. METHODS: In each of twelve dogs, we implanted two unloaded cylindrical (10 mm x 6 mm) titanium implants into the distal femur. The implants were surrounded by a 2.5-mm gap into which morselized allograft bone with or without addition of fragmented autologous periosteum was impacted. After four weeks, the animals were euthanized and the implants were evaluated by histomorphometric analysis and mechanical push-out test. RESULTS: Although less new bone was found on the implant surface and increased volume of fibrous tissue was present in the gap around the implant, no difference was found between treatment groups regarding the mechanical parameters. Increased new bone formation was observed in the immediate vicinity of the periosteum fragments within the bone graft. CONCLUSION: The method for periosteal augmentation used in this study did not alter the mechanical fixation although osseointegration was impaired. The observed activity of new bone formation at the boundary of the periosteum fragments may indicate maintained bone stimulating properties of the transplanted cambium layer. Augmenting the bone graft by smaller fragments of periosteum, isolated cambium layer tissue or cultured periosteal cells could be studied in the future. Bentham Open 2013-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3565231/ /pubmed/23400644 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001307010018 Text en © Barckman et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Barckman, Jeppe
Baas, Jorgen
Sørensen, Mette
Bechtold, Joan E
Soballe, Kjeld
Periosteal Augmentation of Allograft Bone and its Effect on Implant Fixation - An Experimental Study on 12 Dogs()
title Periosteal Augmentation of Allograft Bone and its Effect on Implant Fixation - An Experimental Study on 12 Dogs()
title_full Periosteal Augmentation of Allograft Bone and its Effect on Implant Fixation - An Experimental Study on 12 Dogs()
title_fullStr Periosteal Augmentation of Allograft Bone and its Effect on Implant Fixation - An Experimental Study on 12 Dogs()
title_full_unstemmed Periosteal Augmentation of Allograft Bone and its Effect on Implant Fixation - An Experimental Study on 12 Dogs()
title_short Periosteal Augmentation of Allograft Bone and its Effect on Implant Fixation - An Experimental Study on 12 Dogs()
title_sort periosteal augmentation of allograft bone and its effect on implant fixation - an experimental study on 12 dogs()
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3565231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23400644
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001307010018
work_keys_str_mv AT barckmanjeppe periostealaugmentationofallograftboneanditseffectonimplantfixationanexperimentalstudyon12dogs
AT baasjorgen periostealaugmentationofallograftboneanditseffectonimplantfixationanexperimentalstudyon12dogs
AT sørensenmette periostealaugmentationofallograftboneanditseffectonimplantfixationanexperimentalstudyon12dogs
AT bechtoldjoane periostealaugmentationofallograftboneanditseffectonimplantfixationanexperimentalstudyon12dogs
AT soballekjeld periostealaugmentationofallograftboneanditseffectonimplantfixationanexperimentalstudyon12dogs