Cargando…
Periosteal Augmentation of Allograft Bone and its Effect on Implant Fixation - An Experimental Study on 12 Dogs()
PURPOSE: Periosteum provides essential cellular and biological components necessary for fracture healing and bone repair. We hypothesized that augmenting allograft bone by adding fragmented autologous periosteum would improve fixation of grafted implants. METHODS: In each of twelve dogs, we implante...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bentham Open
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3565231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23400644 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001307010018 |
_version_ | 1782258422416146432 |
---|---|
author | Barckman, Jeppe Baas, Jorgen Sørensen, Mette Bechtold, Joan E Soballe, Kjeld |
author_facet | Barckman, Jeppe Baas, Jorgen Sørensen, Mette Bechtold, Joan E Soballe, Kjeld |
author_sort | Barckman, Jeppe |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Periosteum provides essential cellular and biological components necessary for fracture healing and bone repair. We hypothesized that augmenting allograft bone by adding fragmented autologous periosteum would improve fixation of grafted implants. METHODS: In each of twelve dogs, we implanted two unloaded cylindrical (10 mm x 6 mm) titanium implants into the distal femur. The implants were surrounded by a 2.5-mm gap into which morselized allograft bone with or without addition of fragmented autologous periosteum was impacted. After four weeks, the animals were euthanized and the implants were evaluated by histomorphometric analysis and mechanical push-out test. RESULTS: Although less new bone was found on the implant surface and increased volume of fibrous tissue was present in the gap around the implant, no difference was found between treatment groups regarding the mechanical parameters. Increased new bone formation was observed in the immediate vicinity of the periosteum fragments within the bone graft. CONCLUSION: The method for periosteal augmentation used in this study did not alter the mechanical fixation although osseointegration was impaired. The observed activity of new bone formation at the boundary of the periosteum fragments may indicate maintained bone stimulating properties of the transplanted cambium layer. Augmenting the bone graft by smaller fragments of periosteum, isolated cambium layer tissue or cultured periosteal cells could be studied in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3565231 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Bentham Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35652312013-02-11 Periosteal Augmentation of Allograft Bone and its Effect on Implant Fixation - An Experimental Study on 12 Dogs() Barckman, Jeppe Baas, Jorgen Sørensen, Mette Bechtold, Joan E Soballe, Kjeld Open Orthop J Article PURPOSE: Periosteum provides essential cellular and biological components necessary for fracture healing and bone repair. We hypothesized that augmenting allograft bone by adding fragmented autologous periosteum would improve fixation of grafted implants. METHODS: In each of twelve dogs, we implanted two unloaded cylindrical (10 mm x 6 mm) titanium implants into the distal femur. The implants were surrounded by a 2.5-mm gap into which morselized allograft bone with or without addition of fragmented autologous periosteum was impacted. After four weeks, the animals were euthanized and the implants were evaluated by histomorphometric analysis and mechanical push-out test. RESULTS: Although less new bone was found on the implant surface and increased volume of fibrous tissue was present in the gap around the implant, no difference was found between treatment groups regarding the mechanical parameters. Increased new bone formation was observed in the immediate vicinity of the periosteum fragments within the bone graft. CONCLUSION: The method for periosteal augmentation used in this study did not alter the mechanical fixation although osseointegration was impaired. The observed activity of new bone formation at the boundary of the periosteum fragments may indicate maintained bone stimulating properties of the transplanted cambium layer. Augmenting the bone graft by smaller fragments of periosteum, isolated cambium layer tissue or cultured periosteal cells could be studied in the future. Bentham Open 2013-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3565231/ /pubmed/23400644 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001307010018 Text en © Barckman et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Barckman, Jeppe Baas, Jorgen Sørensen, Mette Bechtold, Joan E Soballe, Kjeld Periosteal Augmentation of Allograft Bone and its Effect on Implant Fixation - An Experimental Study on 12 Dogs() |
title | Periosteal Augmentation of Allograft Bone and its Effect on Implant Fixation - An Experimental Study on 12 Dogs() |
title_full | Periosteal Augmentation of Allograft Bone and its Effect on Implant Fixation - An Experimental Study on 12 Dogs() |
title_fullStr | Periosteal Augmentation of Allograft Bone and its Effect on Implant Fixation - An Experimental Study on 12 Dogs() |
title_full_unstemmed | Periosteal Augmentation of Allograft Bone and its Effect on Implant Fixation - An Experimental Study on 12 Dogs() |
title_short | Periosteal Augmentation of Allograft Bone and its Effect on Implant Fixation - An Experimental Study on 12 Dogs() |
title_sort | periosteal augmentation of allograft bone and its effect on implant fixation - an experimental study on 12 dogs() |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3565231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23400644 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001307010018 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barckmanjeppe periostealaugmentationofallograftboneanditseffectonimplantfixationanexperimentalstudyon12dogs AT baasjorgen periostealaugmentationofallograftboneanditseffectonimplantfixationanexperimentalstudyon12dogs AT sørensenmette periostealaugmentationofallograftboneanditseffectonimplantfixationanexperimentalstudyon12dogs AT bechtoldjoane periostealaugmentationofallograftboneanditseffectonimplantfixationanexperimentalstudyon12dogs AT soballekjeld periostealaugmentationofallograftboneanditseffectonimplantfixationanexperimentalstudyon12dogs |