Cargando…
Systematic review: diet–gene interactions and the risk of colorectal cancer
BACKGROUND: Diet contributes significantly to colorectal cancer (CRC) aetiology and may be potentially modifiable. AIM: To review diet–gene interactions, aiming to further the understanding of the underlying biological pathways in CRC development. METHODS: The PubMed and Medline were systematically...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3565452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23216531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.12180 |
_version_ | 1782258458131693568 |
---|---|
author | Andersen, V Holst, R Vogel, U |
author_facet | Andersen, V Holst, R Vogel, U |
author_sort | Andersen, V |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Diet contributes significantly to colorectal cancer (CRC) aetiology and may be potentially modifiable. AIM: To review diet–gene interactions, aiming to further the understanding of the underlying biological pathways in CRC development. METHODS: The PubMed and Medline were systematically searched for prospective studies in relation to diet, colorectal cancer and genetics. RESULTS: In a meta-analysis, no interaction between NAT1 phenotypes and meat intake in relation to risk of CRC was found (P-value for interaction 0.95). We found a trend towards interaction between NAT2 phenotypes and meat intake in relation to risk of CRC. High meat intake was not associated with risk of CRC among carriers of the slow NAT2 phenotype, whereas NAT2 fast acetylators with high meat intake were at increased risk of CRC (OR = 1.25; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.92–2.01) compared with slow acetylators with low meat intake (reference), P-value for interaction = 0.07. Low meat intake in the studied populations may influence the result. Interactions between meat, cruciferous vegetables, fibres, calcium, vitamins, and alcohol and ABCB1,NFKB1,GSTM1, GSTT1, CCND1, VDR, MGTM, IL10 and PPARG are suggested. CONCLUSIONS: A number of interactions between genetic variation and diet are suggested, but the findings need replication in independent, prospective, and well-characterised cohorts before conclusions regarding the underlying biological mechanisms can be reached. When the above criteria are met, studies on diet–gene interactions may contribute valuable insight into the biological mechanisms underlying the role of various dietary items in colorectal carcinogenesis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3565452 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35654522013-02-08 Systematic review: diet–gene interactions and the risk of colorectal cancer Andersen, V Holst, R Vogel, U Aliment Pharmacol Ther Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: Diet contributes significantly to colorectal cancer (CRC) aetiology and may be potentially modifiable. AIM: To review diet–gene interactions, aiming to further the understanding of the underlying biological pathways in CRC development. METHODS: The PubMed and Medline were systematically searched for prospective studies in relation to diet, colorectal cancer and genetics. RESULTS: In a meta-analysis, no interaction between NAT1 phenotypes and meat intake in relation to risk of CRC was found (P-value for interaction 0.95). We found a trend towards interaction between NAT2 phenotypes and meat intake in relation to risk of CRC. High meat intake was not associated with risk of CRC among carriers of the slow NAT2 phenotype, whereas NAT2 fast acetylators with high meat intake were at increased risk of CRC (OR = 1.25; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.92–2.01) compared with slow acetylators with low meat intake (reference), P-value for interaction = 0.07. Low meat intake in the studied populations may influence the result. Interactions between meat, cruciferous vegetables, fibres, calcium, vitamins, and alcohol and ABCB1,NFKB1,GSTM1, GSTT1, CCND1, VDR, MGTM, IL10 and PPARG are suggested. CONCLUSIONS: A number of interactions between genetic variation and diet are suggested, but the findings need replication in independent, prospective, and well-characterised cohorts before conclusions regarding the underlying biological mechanisms can be reached. When the above criteria are met, studies on diet–gene interactions may contribute valuable insight into the biological mechanisms underlying the role of various dietary items in colorectal carcinogenesis. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013-02 2012-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3565452/ /pubmed/23216531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.12180 Text en Copyright © 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Reviews Andersen, V Holst, R Vogel, U Systematic review: diet–gene interactions and the risk of colorectal cancer |
title | Systematic review: diet–gene interactions and the risk of colorectal cancer |
title_full | Systematic review: diet–gene interactions and the risk of colorectal cancer |
title_fullStr | Systematic review: diet–gene interactions and the risk of colorectal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic review: diet–gene interactions and the risk of colorectal cancer |
title_short | Systematic review: diet–gene interactions and the risk of colorectal cancer |
title_sort | systematic review: diet–gene interactions and the risk of colorectal cancer |
topic | Systematic Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3565452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23216531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.12180 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andersenv systematicreviewdietgeneinteractionsandtheriskofcolorectalcancer AT holstr systematicreviewdietgeneinteractionsandtheriskofcolorectalcancer AT vogelu systematicreviewdietgeneinteractionsandtheriskofcolorectalcancer |