Cargando…

Systematic review: diet–gene interactions and the risk of colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: Diet contributes significantly to colorectal cancer (CRC) aetiology and may be potentially modifiable. AIM: To review diet–gene interactions, aiming to further the understanding of the underlying biological pathways in CRC development. METHODS: The PubMed and Medline were systematically...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andersen, V, Holst, R, Vogel, U
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3565452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23216531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.12180
_version_ 1782258458131693568
author Andersen, V
Holst, R
Vogel, U
author_facet Andersen, V
Holst, R
Vogel, U
author_sort Andersen, V
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diet contributes significantly to colorectal cancer (CRC) aetiology and may be potentially modifiable. AIM: To review diet–gene interactions, aiming to further the understanding of the underlying biological pathways in CRC development. METHODS: The PubMed and Medline were systematically searched for prospective studies in relation to diet, colorectal cancer and genetics. RESULTS: In a meta-analysis, no interaction between NAT1 phenotypes and meat intake in relation to risk of CRC was found (P-value for interaction 0.95). We found a trend towards interaction between NAT2 phenotypes and meat intake in relation to risk of CRC. High meat intake was not associated with risk of CRC among carriers of the slow NAT2 phenotype, whereas NAT2 fast acetylators with high meat intake were at increased risk of CRC (OR = 1.25; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.92–2.01) compared with slow acetylators with low meat intake (reference), P-value for interaction = 0.07. Low meat intake in the studied populations may influence the result. Interactions between meat, cruciferous vegetables, fibres, calcium, vitamins, and alcohol and ABCB1,NFKB1,GSTM1, GSTT1, CCND1, VDR, MGTM, IL10 and PPARG are suggested. CONCLUSIONS: A number of interactions between genetic variation and diet are suggested, but the findings need replication in independent, prospective, and well-characterised cohorts before conclusions regarding the underlying biological mechanisms can be reached. When the above criteria are met, studies on diet–gene interactions may contribute valuable insight into the biological mechanisms underlying the role of various dietary items in colorectal carcinogenesis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3565452
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35654522013-02-08 Systematic review: diet–gene interactions and the risk of colorectal cancer Andersen, V Holst, R Vogel, U Aliment Pharmacol Ther Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: Diet contributes significantly to colorectal cancer (CRC) aetiology and may be potentially modifiable. AIM: To review diet–gene interactions, aiming to further the understanding of the underlying biological pathways in CRC development. METHODS: The PubMed and Medline were systematically searched for prospective studies in relation to diet, colorectal cancer and genetics. RESULTS: In a meta-analysis, no interaction between NAT1 phenotypes and meat intake in relation to risk of CRC was found (P-value for interaction 0.95). We found a trend towards interaction between NAT2 phenotypes and meat intake in relation to risk of CRC. High meat intake was not associated with risk of CRC among carriers of the slow NAT2 phenotype, whereas NAT2 fast acetylators with high meat intake were at increased risk of CRC (OR = 1.25; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.92–2.01) compared with slow acetylators with low meat intake (reference), P-value for interaction = 0.07. Low meat intake in the studied populations may influence the result. Interactions between meat, cruciferous vegetables, fibres, calcium, vitamins, and alcohol and ABCB1,NFKB1,GSTM1, GSTT1, CCND1, VDR, MGTM, IL10 and PPARG are suggested. CONCLUSIONS: A number of interactions between genetic variation and diet are suggested, but the findings need replication in independent, prospective, and well-characterised cohorts before conclusions regarding the underlying biological mechanisms can be reached. When the above criteria are met, studies on diet–gene interactions may contribute valuable insight into the biological mechanisms underlying the role of various dietary items in colorectal carcinogenesis. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013-02 2012-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3565452/ /pubmed/23216531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.12180 Text en Copyright © 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews
Andersen, V
Holst, R
Vogel, U
Systematic review: diet–gene interactions and the risk of colorectal cancer
title Systematic review: diet–gene interactions and the risk of colorectal cancer
title_full Systematic review: diet–gene interactions and the risk of colorectal cancer
title_fullStr Systematic review: diet–gene interactions and the risk of colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review: diet–gene interactions and the risk of colorectal cancer
title_short Systematic review: diet–gene interactions and the risk of colorectal cancer
title_sort systematic review: diet–gene interactions and the risk of colorectal cancer
topic Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3565452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23216531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.12180
work_keys_str_mv AT andersenv systematicreviewdietgeneinteractionsandtheriskofcolorectalcancer
AT holstr systematicreviewdietgeneinteractionsandtheriskofcolorectalcancer
AT vogelu systematicreviewdietgeneinteractionsandtheriskofcolorectalcancer