Cargando…

Randomized double blind trial of ciprofloxacin prophylaxis during induction treatment in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the WK-ALL protocol in Indonesia

OBJECTIVES: Toxic death is a big problem in the treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), especially in low-income countries. Studies of ciprofloxacin as single agent prophylaxis vary widely in success rate. We conducted a double-blind, randomized study to test the effects of ciprof...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Widjajanto, Pudjo H, Sumadiono, Sumadiono, Cloos, Jacqueline, Purwanto, Ignatius, Sutaryo, Sutaryo, Veerman, Anjo JP
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3565570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23403504
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JBM.S33906
_version_ 1782258461650714624
author Widjajanto, Pudjo H
Sumadiono, Sumadiono
Cloos, Jacqueline
Purwanto, Ignatius
Sutaryo, Sutaryo
Veerman, Anjo JP
author_facet Widjajanto, Pudjo H
Sumadiono, Sumadiono
Cloos, Jacqueline
Purwanto, Ignatius
Sutaryo, Sutaryo
Veerman, Anjo JP
author_sort Widjajanto, Pudjo H
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Toxic death is a big problem in the treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), especially in low-income countries. Studies of ciprofloxacin as single agent prophylaxis vary widely in success rate. We conducted a double-blind, randomized study to test the effects of ciprofloxacin monotherapy as prophylaxis for sepsis and death in induction treatment of the Indonesian childhood ALL protocol. METHODS: Patients were randomized to the ciprofloxacin arm (n = 58) and to the placebo arm (n = 52). Oral ciprofloxacin monotherapy or oral placebo was administered twice a day. All events during induction were recorded: toxic death, abandonment, resistant disease, and complete remission rate. RESULTS: Of 110 patients enrolled in this study, 79 (71.8%) achieved CR. In comparison to the placebo arm, the ciprofloxacin arm had lower nadir of absolute neutrophil count during induction with median of 62 (range: 5–884) versus 270 (range: 14–25,480) × 10(9) cells/L (P < 0.01), greater risks for experiencing fever (50.0% versus 32.7%, P = 0.07), clinical sepsis (50.0% versus 38.5%, P = 0.22), and death (18.9% versus 5.8%, P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: In our setting, a reduced intensity protocol in a low-income situation, the data warn against using ciprofloxacin prophylaxis during induction treatment. A lower nadir of neutrophil count and higher mortality were found in the ciprofloxacin group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3565570
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35655702013-02-12 Randomized double blind trial of ciprofloxacin prophylaxis during induction treatment in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the WK-ALL protocol in Indonesia Widjajanto, Pudjo H Sumadiono, Sumadiono Cloos, Jacqueline Purwanto, Ignatius Sutaryo, Sutaryo Veerman, Anjo JP J Blood Med Original Research OBJECTIVES: Toxic death is a big problem in the treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), especially in low-income countries. Studies of ciprofloxacin as single agent prophylaxis vary widely in success rate. We conducted a double-blind, randomized study to test the effects of ciprofloxacin monotherapy as prophylaxis for sepsis and death in induction treatment of the Indonesian childhood ALL protocol. METHODS: Patients were randomized to the ciprofloxacin arm (n = 58) and to the placebo arm (n = 52). Oral ciprofloxacin monotherapy or oral placebo was administered twice a day. All events during induction were recorded: toxic death, abandonment, resistant disease, and complete remission rate. RESULTS: Of 110 patients enrolled in this study, 79 (71.8%) achieved CR. In comparison to the placebo arm, the ciprofloxacin arm had lower nadir of absolute neutrophil count during induction with median of 62 (range: 5–884) versus 270 (range: 14–25,480) × 10(9) cells/L (P < 0.01), greater risks for experiencing fever (50.0% versus 32.7%, P = 0.07), clinical sepsis (50.0% versus 38.5%, P = 0.22), and death (18.9% versus 5.8%, P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: In our setting, a reduced intensity protocol in a low-income situation, the data warn against using ciprofloxacin prophylaxis during induction treatment. A lower nadir of neutrophil count and higher mortality were found in the ciprofloxacin group. Dove Medical Press 2013-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3565570/ /pubmed/23403504 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JBM.S33906 Text en © 2013 Widjajanto et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Widjajanto, Pudjo H
Sumadiono, Sumadiono
Cloos, Jacqueline
Purwanto, Ignatius
Sutaryo, Sutaryo
Veerman, Anjo JP
Randomized double blind trial of ciprofloxacin prophylaxis during induction treatment in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the WK-ALL protocol in Indonesia
title Randomized double blind trial of ciprofloxacin prophylaxis during induction treatment in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the WK-ALL protocol in Indonesia
title_full Randomized double blind trial of ciprofloxacin prophylaxis during induction treatment in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the WK-ALL protocol in Indonesia
title_fullStr Randomized double blind trial of ciprofloxacin prophylaxis during induction treatment in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the WK-ALL protocol in Indonesia
title_full_unstemmed Randomized double blind trial of ciprofloxacin prophylaxis during induction treatment in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the WK-ALL protocol in Indonesia
title_short Randomized double blind trial of ciprofloxacin prophylaxis during induction treatment in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the WK-ALL protocol in Indonesia
title_sort randomized double blind trial of ciprofloxacin prophylaxis during induction treatment in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the wk-all protocol in indonesia
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3565570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23403504
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JBM.S33906
work_keys_str_mv AT widjajantopudjoh randomizeddoubleblindtrialofciprofloxacinprophylaxisduringinductiontreatmentinchildhoodacutelymphoblasticleukemiainthewkallprotocolinindonesia
AT sumadionosumadiono randomizeddoubleblindtrialofciprofloxacinprophylaxisduringinductiontreatmentinchildhoodacutelymphoblasticleukemiainthewkallprotocolinindonesia
AT cloosjacqueline randomizeddoubleblindtrialofciprofloxacinprophylaxisduringinductiontreatmentinchildhoodacutelymphoblasticleukemiainthewkallprotocolinindonesia
AT purwantoignatius randomizeddoubleblindtrialofciprofloxacinprophylaxisduringinductiontreatmentinchildhoodacutelymphoblasticleukemiainthewkallprotocolinindonesia
AT sutaryosutaryo randomizeddoubleblindtrialofciprofloxacinprophylaxisduringinductiontreatmentinchildhoodacutelymphoblasticleukemiainthewkallprotocolinindonesia
AT veermananjojp randomizeddoubleblindtrialofciprofloxacinprophylaxisduringinductiontreatmentinchildhoodacutelymphoblasticleukemiainthewkallprotocolinindonesia