Cargando…

Quantitative Comparison of PET and Bremsstrahlung SPECT for Imaging the In Vivo Yttrium-90 Microsphere Distribution after Liver Radioembolization

BACKGROUND: After yttrium-90 ((90)Y) microsphere radioembolization (RE), evaluation of extrahepatic activity and liver dosimetry is typically performed on (90)Y Bremsstrahlung SPECT images. Since these images demonstrate a low quantitative accuracy, (90)Y PET has been suggested as an alternative. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elschot, Mattijs, Vermolen, Bart J., Lam, Marnix G. E. H., de Keizer, Bart, van den Bosch, Maurice A. A. J., de Jong, Hugo W. A. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3566032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23405207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055742
_version_ 1782258515285377024
author Elschot, Mattijs
Vermolen, Bart J.
Lam, Marnix G. E. H.
de Keizer, Bart
van den Bosch, Maurice A. A. J.
de Jong, Hugo W. A. M.
author_facet Elschot, Mattijs
Vermolen, Bart J.
Lam, Marnix G. E. H.
de Keizer, Bart
van den Bosch, Maurice A. A. J.
de Jong, Hugo W. A. M.
author_sort Elschot, Mattijs
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: After yttrium-90 ((90)Y) microsphere radioembolization (RE), evaluation of extrahepatic activity and liver dosimetry is typically performed on (90)Y Bremsstrahlung SPECT images. Since these images demonstrate a low quantitative accuracy, (90)Y PET has been suggested as an alternative. The aim of this study is to quantitatively compare SPECT and state-of-the-art PET on the ability to detect small accumulations of (90)Y and on the accuracy of liver dosimetry. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: SPECT/CT and PET/CT phantom data were acquired using several acquisition and reconstruction protocols, including resolution recovery and Time-Of-Flight (TOF) PET. Image contrast and noise were compared using a torso-shaped phantom containing six hot spheres of various sizes. The ability to detect extra- and intrahepatic accumulations of activity was tested by quantitative evaluation of the visibility and unique detectability of the phantom hot spheres. Image-based dose estimates of the phantom were compared to the true dose. For clinical illustration, the SPECT and PET-based estimated liver dose distributions of five RE patients were compared. At equal noise level, PET showed higher contrast recovery coefficients than SPECT. The highest contrast recovery coefficients were obtained with TOF PET reconstruction including resolution recovery. All six spheres were consistently visible on SPECT and PET images, but PET was able to uniquely detect smaller spheres than SPECT. TOF PET-based estimates of the dose in the phantom spheres were more accurate than SPECT-based dose estimates, with underestimations ranging from 45% (10-mm sphere) to 11% (37-mm sphere) for PET, and 75% to 58% for SPECT, respectively. The differences between TOF PET and SPECT dose-estimates were supported by the patient data. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: In this study we quantitatively demonstrated that the image quality of state-of-the-art PET is superior over Bremsstrahlung SPECT for the assessment of the (90)Y microsphere distribution after radioembolization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3566032
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35660322013-02-12 Quantitative Comparison of PET and Bremsstrahlung SPECT for Imaging the In Vivo Yttrium-90 Microsphere Distribution after Liver Radioembolization Elschot, Mattijs Vermolen, Bart J. Lam, Marnix G. E. H. de Keizer, Bart van den Bosch, Maurice A. A. J. de Jong, Hugo W. A. M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: After yttrium-90 ((90)Y) microsphere radioembolization (RE), evaluation of extrahepatic activity and liver dosimetry is typically performed on (90)Y Bremsstrahlung SPECT images. Since these images demonstrate a low quantitative accuracy, (90)Y PET has been suggested as an alternative. The aim of this study is to quantitatively compare SPECT and state-of-the-art PET on the ability to detect small accumulations of (90)Y and on the accuracy of liver dosimetry. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: SPECT/CT and PET/CT phantom data were acquired using several acquisition and reconstruction protocols, including resolution recovery and Time-Of-Flight (TOF) PET. Image contrast and noise were compared using a torso-shaped phantom containing six hot spheres of various sizes. The ability to detect extra- and intrahepatic accumulations of activity was tested by quantitative evaluation of the visibility and unique detectability of the phantom hot spheres. Image-based dose estimates of the phantom were compared to the true dose. For clinical illustration, the SPECT and PET-based estimated liver dose distributions of five RE patients were compared. At equal noise level, PET showed higher contrast recovery coefficients than SPECT. The highest contrast recovery coefficients were obtained with TOF PET reconstruction including resolution recovery. All six spheres were consistently visible on SPECT and PET images, but PET was able to uniquely detect smaller spheres than SPECT. TOF PET-based estimates of the dose in the phantom spheres were more accurate than SPECT-based dose estimates, with underestimations ranging from 45% (10-mm sphere) to 11% (37-mm sphere) for PET, and 75% to 58% for SPECT, respectively. The differences between TOF PET and SPECT dose-estimates were supported by the patient data. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: In this study we quantitatively demonstrated that the image quality of state-of-the-art PET is superior over Bremsstrahlung SPECT for the assessment of the (90)Y microsphere distribution after radioembolization. Public Library of Science 2013-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3566032/ /pubmed/23405207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055742 Text en © 2013 Elschot et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Elschot, Mattijs
Vermolen, Bart J.
Lam, Marnix G. E. H.
de Keizer, Bart
van den Bosch, Maurice A. A. J.
de Jong, Hugo W. A. M.
Quantitative Comparison of PET and Bremsstrahlung SPECT for Imaging the In Vivo Yttrium-90 Microsphere Distribution after Liver Radioembolization
title Quantitative Comparison of PET and Bremsstrahlung SPECT for Imaging the In Vivo Yttrium-90 Microsphere Distribution after Liver Radioembolization
title_full Quantitative Comparison of PET and Bremsstrahlung SPECT for Imaging the In Vivo Yttrium-90 Microsphere Distribution after Liver Radioembolization
title_fullStr Quantitative Comparison of PET and Bremsstrahlung SPECT for Imaging the In Vivo Yttrium-90 Microsphere Distribution after Liver Radioembolization
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative Comparison of PET and Bremsstrahlung SPECT for Imaging the In Vivo Yttrium-90 Microsphere Distribution after Liver Radioembolization
title_short Quantitative Comparison of PET and Bremsstrahlung SPECT for Imaging the In Vivo Yttrium-90 Microsphere Distribution after Liver Radioembolization
title_sort quantitative comparison of pet and bremsstrahlung spect for imaging the in vivo yttrium-90 microsphere distribution after liver radioembolization
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3566032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23405207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055742
work_keys_str_mv AT elschotmattijs quantitativecomparisonofpetandbremsstrahlungspectforimagingtheinvivoyttrium90microspheredistributionafterliverradioembolization
AT vermolenbartj quantitativecomparisonofpetandbremsstrahlungspectforimagingtheinvivoyttrium90microspheredistributionafterliverradioembolization
AT lammarnixgeh quantitativecomparisonofpetandbremsstrahlungspectforimagingtheinvivoyttrium90microspheredistributionafterliverradioembolization
AT dekeizerbart quantitativecomparisonofpetandbremsstrahlungspectforimagingtheinvivoyttrium90microspheredistributionafterliverradioembolization
AT vandenboschmauriceaaj quantitativecomparisonofpetandbremsstrahlungspectforimagingtheinvivoyttrium90microspheredistributionafterliverradioembolization
AT dejonghugowam quantitativecomparisonofpetandbremsstrahlungspectforimagingtheinvivoyttrium90microspheredistributionafterliverradioembolization