Cargando…
Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from the Reading of Books and Digital Media
In the rapidly changing circumstances of our increasingly digital world, reading is also becoming an increasingly digital experience: electronic books (e-books) are now outselling print books in the United States and the United Kingdom. Nevertheless, many readers still view e-books as less readable...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3566074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23405265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056178 |
_version_ | 1782258523185348608 |
---|---|
author | Kretzschmar, Franziska Pleimling, Dominique Hosemann, Jana Füssel, Stephan Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina Schlesewsky, Matthias |
author_facet | Kretzschmar, Franziska Pleimling, Dominique Hosemann, Jana Füssel, Stephan Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina Schlesewsky, Matthias |
author_sort | Kretzschmar, Franziska |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the rapidly changing circumstances of our increasingly digital world, reading is also becoming an increasingly digital experience: electronic books (e-books) are now outselling print books in the United States and the United Kingdom. Nevertheless, many readers still view e-books as less readable than print books. The present study thus used combined EEG and eyetracking measures in order to test whether reading from digital media requires higher cognitive effort than reading conventional books. Young and elderly adults read short texts on three different reading devices: a paper page, an e-reader and a tablet computer and answered comprehension questions about them while their eye movements and EEG were recorded. The results of a debriefing questionnaire replicated previous findings in that participants overwhelmingly chose the paper page over the two electronic devices as their preferred reading medium. Online measures, by contrast, showed shorter mean fixation durations and lower EEG theta band voltage density – known to covary with memory encoding and retrieval – for the older adults when reading from a tablet computer in comparison to the other two devices. Young adults showed comparable fixation durations and theta activity for all three devices. Comprehension accuracy did not differ across the three media for either group. We argue that these results can be explained in terms of the better text discriminability (higher contrast) produced by the backlit display of the tablet computer. Contrast sensitivity decreases with age and degraded contrast conditions lead to longer reading times, thus supporting the conclusion that older readers may benefit particularly from the enhanced contrast of the tablet. Our findings thus indicate that people's subjective evaluation of digital reading media must be dissociated from the cognitive and neural effort expended in online information processing while reading from such devices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3566074 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35660742013-02-12 Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from the Reading of Books and Digital Media Kretzschmar, Franziska Pleimling, Dominique Hosemann, Jana Füssel, Stephan Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina Schlesewsky, Matthias PLoS One Research Article In the rapidly changing circumstances of our increasingly digital world, reading is also becoming an increasingly digital experience: electronic books (e-books) are now outselling print books in the United States and the United Kingdom. Nevertheless, many readers still view e-books as less readable than print books. The present study thus used combined EEG and eyetracking measures in order to test whether reading from digital media requires higher cognitive effort than reading conventional books. Young and elderly adults read short texts on three different reading devices: a paper page, an e-reader and a tablet computer and answered comprehension questions about them while their eye movements and EEG were recorded. The results of a debriefing questionnaire replicated previous findings in that participants overwhelmingly chose the paper page over the two electronic devices as their preferred reading medium. Online measures, by contrast, showed shorter mean fixation durations and lower EEG theta band voltage density – known to covary with memory encoding and retrieval – for the older adults when reading from a tablet computer in comparison to the other two devices. Young adults showed comparable fixation durations and theta activity for all three devices. Comprehension accuracy did not differ across the three media for either group. We argue that these results can be explained in terms of the better text discriminability (higher contrast) produced by the backlit display of the tablet computer. Contrast sensitivity decreases with age and degraded contrast conditions lead to longer reading times, thus supporting the conclusion that older readers may benefit particularly from the enhanced contrast of the tablet. Our findings thus indicate that people's subjective evaluation of digital reading media must be dissociated from the cognitive and neural effort expended in online information processing while reading from such devices. Public Library of Science 2013-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3566074/ /pubmed/23405265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056178 Text en © 2013 Kretzschmar et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kretzschmar, Franziska Pleimling, Dominique Hosemann, Jana Füssel, Stephan Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina Schlesewsky, Matthias Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from the Reading of Books and Digital Media |
title | Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from the Reading of Books and Digital Media |
title_full | Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from the Reading of Books and Digital Media |
title_fullStr | Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from the Reading of Books and Digital Media |
title_full_unstemmed | Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from the Reading of Books and Digital Media |
title_short | Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from the Reading of Books and Digital Media |
title_sort | subjective impressions do not mirror online reading effort: concurrent eeg-eyetracking evidence from the reading of books and digital media |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3566074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23405265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056178 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kretzschmarfranziska subjectiveimpressionsdonotmirroronlinereadingeffortconcurrenteegeyetrackingevidencefromthereadingofbooksanddigitalmedia AT pleimlingdominique subjectiveimpressionsdonotmirroronlinereadingeffortconcurrenteegeyetrackingevidencefromthereadingofbooksanddigitalmedia AT hosemannjana subjectiveimpressionsdonotmirroronlinereadingeffortconcurrenteegeyetrackingevidencefromthereadingofbooksanddigitalmedia AT fusselstephan subjectiveimpressionsdonotmirroronlinereadingeffortconcurrenteegeyetrackingevidencefromthereadingofbooksanddigitalmedia AT bornkesselschlesewskyina subjectiveimpressionsdonotmirroronlinereadingeffortconcurrenteegeyetrackingevidencefromthereadingofbooksanddigitalmedia AT schlesewskymatthias subjectiveimpressionsdonotmirroronlinereadingeffortconcurrenteegeyetrackingevidencefromthereadingofbooksanddigitalmedia |