Cargando…

Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from the Reading of Books and Digital Media

In the rapidly changing circumstances of our increasingly digital world, reading is also becoming an increasingly digital experience: electronic books (e-books) are now outselling print books in the United States and the United Kingdom. Nevertheless, many readers still view e-books as less readable...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kretzschmar, Franziska, Pleimling, Dominique, Hosemann, Jana, Füssel, Stephan, Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina, Schlesewsky, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3566074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23405265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056178
_version_ 1782258523185348608
author Kretzschmar, Franziska
Pleimling, Dominique
Hosemann, Jana
Füssel, Stephan
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina
Schlesewsky, Matthias
author_facet Kretzschmar, Franziska
Pleimling, Dominique
Hosemann, Jana
Füssel, Stephan
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina
Schlesewsky, Matthias
author_sort Kretzschmar, Franziska
collection PubMed
description In the rapidly changing circumstances of our increasingly digital world, reading is also becoming an increasingly digital experience: electronic books (e-books) are now outselling print books in the United States and the United Kingdom. Nevertheless, many readers still view e-books as less readable than print books. The present study thus used combined EEG and eyetracking measures in order to test whether reading from digital media requires higher cognitive effort than reading conventional books. Young and elderly adults read short texts on three different reading devices: a paper page, an e-reader and a tablet computer and answered comprehension questions about them while their eye movements and EEG were recorded. The results of a debriefing questionnaire replicated previous findings in that participants overwhelmingly chose the paper page over the two electronic devices as their preferred reading medium. Online measures, by contrast, showed shorter mean fixation durations and lower EEG theta band voltage density – known to covary with memory encoding and retrieval – for the older adults when reading from a tablet computer in comparison to the other two devices. Young adults showed comparable fixation durations and theta activity for all three devices. Comprehension accuracy did not differ across the three media for either group. We argue that these results can be explained in terms of the better text discriminability (higher contrast) produced by the backlit display of the tablet computer. Contrast sensitivity decreases with age and degraded contrast conditions lead to longer reading times, thus supporting the conclusion that older readers may benefit particularly from the enhanced contrast of the tablet. Our findings thus indicate that people's subjective evaluation of digital reading media must be dissociated from the cognitive and neural effort expended in online information processing while reading from such devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3566074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35660742013-02-12 Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from the Reading of Books and Digital Media Kretzschmar, Franziska Pleimling, Dominique Hosemann, Jana Füssel, Stephan Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina Schlesewsky, Matthias PLoS One Research Article In the rapidly changing circumstances of our increasingly digital world, reading is also becoming an increasingly digital experience: electronic books (e-books) are now outselling print books in the United States and the United Kingdom. Nevertheless, many readers still view e-books as less readable than print books. The present study thus used combined EEG and eyetracking measures in order to test whether reading from digital media requires higher cognitive effort than reading conventional books. Young and elderly adults read short texts on three different reading devices: a paper page, an e-reader and a tablet computer and answered comprehension questions about them while their eye movements and EEG were recorded. The results of a debriefing questionnaire replicated previous findings in that participants overwhelmingly chose the paper page over the two electronic devices as their preferred reading medium. Online measures, by contrast, showed shorter mean fixation durations and lower EEG theta band voltage density – known to covary with memory encoding and retrieval – for the older adults when reading from a tablet computer in comparison to the other two devices. Young adults showed comparable fixation durations and theta activity for all three devices. Comprehension accuracy did not differ across the three media for either group. We argue that these results can be explained in terms of the better text discriminability (higher contrast) produced by the backlit display of the tablet computer. Contrast sensitivity decreases with age and degraded contrast conditions lead to longer reading times, thus supporting the conclusion that older readers may benefit particularly from the enhanced contrast of the tablet. Our findings thus indicate that people's subjective evaluation of digital reading media must be dissociated from the cognitive and neural effort expended in online information processing while reading from such devices. Public Library of Science 2013-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3566074/ /pubmed/23405265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056178 Text en © 2013 Kretzschmar et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kretzschmar, Franziska
Pleimling, Dominique
Hosemann, Jana
Füssel, Stephan
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina
Schlesewsky, Matthias
Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from the Reading of Books and Digital Media
title Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from the Reading of Books and Digital Media
title_full Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from the Reading of Books and Digital Media
title_fullStr Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from the Reading of Books and Digital Media
title_full_unstemmed Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from the Reading of Books and Digital Media
title_short Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from the Reading of Books and Digital Media
title_sort subjective impressions do not mirror online reading effort: concurrent eeg-eyetracking evidence from the reading of books and digital media
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3566074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23405265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056178
work_keys_str_mv AT kretzschmarfranziska subjectiveimpressionsdonotmirroronlinereadingeffortconcurrenteegeyetrackingevidencefromthereadingofbooksanddigitalmedia
AT pleimlingdominique subjectiveimpressionsdonotmirroronlinereadingeffortconcurrenteegeyetrackingevidencefromthereadingofbooksanddigitalmedia
AT hosemannjana subjectiveimpressionsdonotmirroronlinereadingeffortconcurrenteegeyetrackingevidencefromthereadingofbooksanddigitalmedia
AT fusselstephan subjectiveimpressionsdonotmirroronlinereadingeffortconcurrenteegeyetrackingevidencefromthereadingofbooksanddigitalmedia
AT bornkesselschlesewskyina subjectiveimpressionsdonotmirroronlinereadingeffortconcurrenteegeyetrackingevidencefromthereadingofbooksanddigitalmedia
AT schlesewskymatthias subjectiveimpressionsdonotmirroronlinereadingeffortconcurrenteegeyetrackingevidencefromthereadingofbooksanddigitalmedia