Cargando…
Comparison of Sequencing Platforms for Single Nucleotide Variant Calls in a Human Sample
Next-generation sequencings platforms coupled with advanced bioinformatic tools enable re-sequencing of the human genome at high-speed and large cost savings. We compare sequencing platforms from Roche/454(GS FLX), Illumina/HiSeq (HiSeq 2000), and Life Technologies/SOLiD (SOLiD 3 ECC) for their abil...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3566181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23405114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055089 |
_version_ | 1782258548993949696 |
---|---|
author | Ratan, Aakrosh Miller, Webb Guillory, Joseph Stinson, Jeremy Seshagiri, Somasekar Schuster, Stephan C. |
author_facet | Ratan, Aakrosh Miller, Webb Guillory, Joseph Stinson, Jeremy Seshagiri, Somasekar Schuster, Stephan C. |
author_sort | Ratan, Aakrosh |
collection | PubMed |
description | Next-generation sequencings platforms coupled with advanced bioinformatic tools enable re-sequencing of the human genome at high-speed and large cost savings. We compare sequencing platforms from Roche/454(GS FLX), Illumina/HiSeq (HiSeq 2000), and Life Technologies/SOLiD (SOLiD 3 ECC) for their ability to identify single nucleotide substitutions in whole genome sequences from the same human sample. We report on significant GC-related bias observed in the data sequenced on Illumina and SOLiD platforms. The differences in the variant calls were investigated with regards to coverage, and sequencing error. Some of the variants called by only one or two of the platforms were experimentally tested using mass spectrometry; a method that is independent of DNA sequencing. We establish several causes why variants remained unreported, specific to each platform. We report the indel called using the three sequencing technologies and from the obtained results we conclude that sequencing human genomes with more than a single platform and multiple libraries is beneficial when high level of accuracy is required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3566181 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35661812013-02-12 Comparison of Sequencing Platforms for Single Nucleotide Variant Calls in a Human Sample Ratan, Aakrosh Miller, Webb Guillory, Joseph Stinson, Jeremy Seshagiri, Somasekar Schuster, Stephan C. PLoS One Research Article Next-generation sequencings platforms coupled with advanced bioinformatic tools enable re-sequencing of the human genome at high-speed and large cost savings. We compare sequencing platforms from Roche/454(GS FLX), Illumina/HiSeq (HiSeq 2000), and Life Technologies/SOLiD (SOLiD 3 ECC) for their ability to identify single nucleotide substitutions in whole genome sequences from the same human sample. We report on significant GC-related bias observed in the data sequenced on Illumina and SOLiD platforms. The differences in the variant calls were investigated with regards to coverage, and sequencing error. Some of the variants called by only one or two of the platforms were experimentally tested using mass spectrometry; a method that is independent of DNA sequencing. We establish several causes why variants remained unreported, specific to each platform. We report the indel called using the three sequencing technologies and from the obtained results we conclude that sequencing human genomes with more than a single platform and multiple libraries is beneficial when high level of accuracy is required. Public Library of Science 2013-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3566181/ /pubmed/23405114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055089 Text en © 2013 Ratan et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ratan, Aakrosh Miller, Webb Guillory, Joseph Stinson, Jeremy Seshagiri, Somasekar Schuster, Stephan C. Comparison of Sequencing Platforms for Single Nucleotide Variant Calls in a Human Sample |
title | Comparison of Sequencing Platforms for Single Nucleotide Variant Calls in a Human Sample |
title_full | Comparison of Sequencing Platforms for Single Nucleotide Variant Calls in a Human Sample |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Sequencing Platforms for Single Nucleotide Variant Calls in a Human Sample |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Sequencing Platforms for Single Nucleotide Variant Calls in a Human Sample |
title_short | Comparison of Sequencing Platforms for Single Nucleotide Variant Calls in a Human Sample |
title_sort | comparison of sequencing platforms for single nucleotide variant calls in a human sample |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3566181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23405114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055089 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ratanaakrosh comparisonofsequencingplatformsforsinglenucleotidevariantcallsinahumansample AT millerwebb comparisonofsequencingplatformsforsinglenucleotidevariantcallsinahumansample AT guilloryjoseph comparisonofsequencingplatformsforsinglenucleotidevariantcallsinahumansample AT stinsonjeremy comparisonofsequencingplatformsforsinglenucleotidevariantcallsinahumansample AT seshagirisomasekar comparisonofsequencingplatformsforsinglenucleotidevariantcallsinahumansample AT schusterstephanc comparisonofsequencingplatformsforsinglenucleotidevariantcallsinahumansample |