Cargando…

Comparison of Sequencing Platforms for Single Nucleotide Variant Calls in a Human Sample

Next-generation sequencings platforms coupled with advanced bioinformatic tools enable re-sequencing of the human genome at high-speed and large cost savings. We compare sequencing platforms from Roche/454(GS FLX), Illumina/HiSeq (HiSeq 2000), and Life Technologies/SOLiD (SOLiD 3 ECC) for their abil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ratan, Aakrosh, Miller, Webb, Guillory, Joseph, Stinson, Jeremy, Seshagiri, Somasekar, Schuster, Stephan C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3566181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23405114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055089
_version_ 1782258548993949696
author Ratan, Aakrosh
Miller, Webb
Guillory, Joseph
Stinson, Jeremy
Seshagiri, Somasekar
Schuster, Stephan C.
author_facet Ratan, Aakrosh
Miller, Webb
Guillory, Joseph
Stinson, Jeremy
Seshagiri, Somasekar
Schuster, Stephan C.
author_sort Ratan, Aakrosh
collection PubMed
description Next-generation sequencings platforms coupled with advanced bioinformatic tools enable re-sequencing of the human genome at high-speed and large cost savings. We compare sequencing platforms from Roche/454(GS FLX), Illumina/HiSeq (HiSeq 2000), and Life Technologies/SOLiD (SOLiD 3 ECC) for their ability to identify single nucleotide substitutions in whole genome sequences from the same human sample. We report on significant GC-related bias observed in the data sequenced on Illumina and SOLiD platforms. The differences in the variant calls were investigated with regards to coverage, and sequencing error. Some of the variants called by only one or two of the platforms were experimentally tested using mass spectrometry; a method that is independent of DNA sequencing. We establish several causes why variants remained unreported, specific to each platform. We report the indel called using the three sequencing technologies and from the obtained results we conclude that sequencing human genomes with more than a single platform and multiple libraries is beneficial when high level of accuracy is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3566181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35661812013-02-12 Comparison of Sequencing Platforms for Single Nucleotide Variant Calls in a Human Sample Ratan, Aakrosh Miller, Webb Guillory, Joseph Stinson, Jeremy Seshagiri, Somasekar Schuster, Stephan C. PLoS One Research Article Next-generation sequencings platforms coupled with advanced bioinformatic tools enable re-sequencing of the human genome at high-speed and large cost savings. We compare sequencing platforms from Roche/454(GS FLX), Illumina/HiSeq (HiSeq 2000), and Life Technologies/SOLiD (SOLiD 3 ECC) for their ability to identify single nucleotide substitutions in whole genome sequences from the same human sample. We report on significant GC-related bias observed in the data sequenced on Illumina and SOLiD platforms. The differences in the variant calls were investigated with regards to coverage, and sequencing error. Some of the variants called by only one or two of the platforms were experimentally tested using mass spectrometry; a method that is independent of DNA sequencing. We establish several causes why variants remained unreported, specific to each platform. We report the indel called using the three sequencing technologies and from the obtained results we conclude that sequencing human genomes with more than a single platform and multiple libraries is beneficial when high level of accuracy is required. Public Library of Science 2013-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3566181/ /pubmed/23405114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055089 Text en © 2013 Ratan et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ratan, Aakrosh
Miller, Webb
Guillory, Joseph
Stinson, Jeremy
Seshagiri, Somasekar
Schuster, Stephan C.
Comparison of Sequencing Platforms for Single Nucleotide Variant Calls in a Human Sample
title Comparison of Sequencing Platforms for Single Nucleotide Variant Calls in a Human Sample
title_full Comparison of Sequencing Platforms for Single Nucleotide Variant Calls in a Human Sample
title_fullStr Comparison of Sequencing Platforms for Single Nucleotide Variant Calls in a Human Sample
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Sequencing Platforms for Single Nucleotide Variant Calls in a Human Sample
title_short Comparison of Sequencing Platforms for Single Nucleotide Variant Calls in a Human Sample
title_sort comparison of sequencing platforms for single nucleotide variant calls in a human sample
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3566181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23405114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055089
work_keys_str_mv AT ratanaakrosh comparisonofsequencingplatformsforsinglenucleotidevariantcallsinahumansample
AT millerwebb comparisonofsequencingplatformsforsinglenucleotidevariantcallsinahumansample
AT guilloryjoseph comparisonofsequencingplatformsforsinglenucleotidevariantcallsinahumansample
AT stinsonjeremy comparisonofsequencingplatformsforsinglenucleotidevariantcallsinahumansample
AT seshagirisomasekar comparisonofsequencingplatformsforsinglenucleotidevariantcallsinahumansample
AT schusterstephanc comparisonofsequencingplatformsforsinglenucleotidevariantcallsinahumansample