Cargando…

Writing and reading in the electronic health record: an entirely new world

BACKGROUND: Electronic health records (EHRs) are structured, distributed documentation systems that differ from paper charts. These systems require skills not traditionally used to navigate a paper chart and to produce a written clinic note. Despite these differences, little attention has been given...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Heeyoung, Lopp, Lauri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Co-Action Publishing 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3566375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23394976
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v18i0.18634
_version_ 1782258560669843456
author Han, Heeyoung
Lopp, Lauri
author_facet Han, Heeyoung
Lopp, Lauri
author_sort Han, Heeyoung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Electronic health records (EHRs) are structured, distributed documentation systems that differ from paper charts. These systems require skills not traditionally used to navigate a paper chart and to produce a written clinic note. Despite these differences, little attention has been given to physicians’ electronic health record (EHR)-writing and -reading competence. PURPOSES: This study aims to investigate physicians’ self-assessed competence to document and to read EHR notes; writing and reading preferences in an EHR; and demographic characteristics associated with their perceived EHR ability and preference. METHODS: Fourteen 5-point Likert scale items, based on EHR system characteristics and a literature review, were developed to measure EHR-writing and -reading competence and preference. Physicians in the midwest region of the United States were invited via e-mail to complete the survey online from February to April 2011. Factor analysis and reliability testing were conducted to provide validity and reliability of the instrument. Correlation and regression analysis were conducted to pursue answers to the research questions. RESULTS: Ninety-one physicians (12.5%), from general and specialty fields, working in inpatient and outpatient settings, participated in the survey. Despite over 3 years of EHR experience, respondents perceived themselves to be incompetent in EHR writing and reading (Mean = 2.74, SD = 0.76). They preferred to read succinct, narrative notes in EHR systems. However, physicians with higher perceived EHR-writing and -reading competence had less preference toward reading succinct (r= − 0.33, p<0.001) and narrative (r= − 0.36, p<0.001) EHR notes than physicians with lower perceived EHR competence. Physicians’ perceived EHR-writing and - reading competence was strongly related to their EHR navigation skills (r=0.55, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Writing and reading EHR documentation is different for physicians. Maximizing navigation skills can optimize non-linear EHR writing and reading. Pedagogical questions remain related to how physicians and medical students are able to retrieve correct information effectively and to understand thought patterns in collectively lengthier and sometimes fragmented EHR chart notes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3566375
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Co-Action Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35663752013-02-07 Writing and reading in the electronic health record: an entirely new world Han, Heeyoung Lopp, Lauri Med Educ Online Trend Article BACKGROUND: Electronic health records (EHRs) are structured, distributed documentation systems that differ from paper charts. These systems require skills not traditionally used to navigate a paper chart and to produce a written clinic note. Despite these differences, little attention has been given to physicians’ electronic health record (EHR)-writing and -reading competence. PURPOSES: This study aims to investigate physicians’ self-assessed competence to document and to read EHR notes; writing and reading preferences in an EHR; and demographic characteristics associated with their perceived EHR ability and preference. METHODS: Fourteen 5-point Likert scale items, based on EHR system characteristics and a literature review, were developed to measure EHR-writing and -reading competence and preference. Physicians in the midwest region of the United States were invited via e-mail to complete the survey online from February to April 2011. Factor analysis and reliability testing were conducted to provide validity and reliability of the instrument. Correlation and regression analysis were conducted to pursue answers to the research questions. RESULTS: Ninety-one physicians (12.5%), from general and specialty fields, working in inpatient and outpatient settings, participated in the survey. Despite over 3 years of EHR experience, respondents perceived themselves to be incompetent in EHR writing and reading (Mean = 2.74, SD = 0.76). They preferred to read succinct, narrative notes in EHR systems. However, physicians with higher perceived EHR-writing and -reading competence had less preference toward reading succinct (r= − 0.33, p<0.001) and narrative (r= − 0.36, p<0.001) EHR notes than physicians with lower perceived EHR competence. Physicians’ perceived EHR-writing and - reading competence was strongly related to their EHR navigation skills (r=0.55, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Writing and reading EHR documentation is different for physicians. Maximizing navigation skills can optimize non-linear EHR writing and reading. Pedagogical questions remain related to how physicians and medical students are able to retrieve correct information effectively and to understand thought patterns in collectively lengthier and sometimes fragmented EHR chart notes. Co-Action Publishing 2013-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3566375/ /pubmed/23394976 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v18i0.18634 Text en © 2013 Heeyoung Han and Lauri Lopp http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Trend Article
Han, Heeyoung
Lopp, Lauri
Writing and reading in the electronic health record: an entirely new world
title Writing and reading in the electronic health record: an entirely new world
title_full Writing and reading in the electronic health record: an entirely new world
title_fullStr Writing and reading in the electronic health record: an entirely new world
title_full_unstemmed Writing and reading in the electronic health record: an entirely new world
title_short Writing and reading in the electronic health record: an entirely new world
title_sort writing and reading in the electronic health record: an entirely new world
topic Trend Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3566375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23394976
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v18i0.18634
work_keys_str_mv AT hanheeyoung writingandreadingintheelectronichealthrecordanentirelynewworld
AT lopplauri writingandreadingintheelectronichealthrecordanentirelynewworld