Cargando…

Prognostic significance of aberrantly silenced ANPEP expression in prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: Novel biomarkers for prostate cancer (PC) are urgently needed. This study investigates the expression, epigenetic regulation, and prognostic potential of ANPEP in PC. METHODS: Aminopeptidase N (APN; encoded by ANPEP) expression was analysed by immunohistochemistry using tissue microarray...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sørensen, K D, Abildgaard, M O, Haldrup, C, Ulhøi, B P, Kristensen, H, Strand, S, Parker, C, Høyer, S, Borre, M, Ørntoft, T F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3566819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23322201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.549
_version_ 1782258607966912512
author Sørensen, K D
Abildgaard, M O
Haldrup, C
Ulhøi, B P
Kristensen, H
Strand, S
Parker, C
Høyer, S
Borre, M
Ørntoft, T F
author_facet Sørensen, K D
Abildgaard, M O
Haldrup, C
Ulhøi, B P
Kristensen, H
Strand, S
Parker, C
Høyer, S
Borre, M
Ørntoft, T F
author_sort Sørensen, K D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Novel biomarkers for prostate cancer (PC) are urgently needed. This study investigates the expression, epigenetic regulation, and prognostic potential of ANPEP in PC. METHODS: Aminopeptidase N (APN; encoded by ANPEP) expression was analysed by immunohistochemistry using tissue microarrays representing 267 radical prostatectomy (RP) and 111 conservatively treated (CT) PC patients. Clinical end points were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS), respectively. The ANPEP promoter methylation levels were determined by bisulphite sequencing or MethyLight analysis in 278 nonmalignant and PC tissue samples, and in cell lines. RESULTS: The APN expression was significantly downregulated in PC compared with nonmalignant prostate tissue samples. Aberrant promoter hypermethylation was frequently observed in PC tissue samples, and 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine induced ANPEP expression in three hypermethylated prostate cell lines, suggesting epigenetic silencing. Negative APN immunoreactivity was significantly associated with short RFS and short CSS in the RP and CT cohort, respectively, independently of routine clinicopathological predictors. Combining APN with a known angiogenesis marker (vascular endothelial growth factor or microvessel density) improved risk prediction significantly in both cohorts. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest negative APN immunoreactivity as a new independent adverse prognostic factor for patients with clinically localised PC and, furthermore, that epigenetic mechanisms are involved in silencing of ANPEP in PC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3566819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35668192014-02-05 Prognostic significance of aberrantly silenced ANPEP expression in prostate cancer Sørensen, K D Abildgaard, M O Haldrup, C Ulhøi, B P Kristensen, H Strand, S Parker, C Høyer, S Borre, M Ørntoft, T F Br J Cancer Molecular Diagnostics BACKGROUND: Novel biomarkers for prostate cancer (PC) are urgently needed. This study investigates the expression, epigenetic regulation, and prognostic potential of ANPEP in PC. METHODS: Aminopeptidase N (APN; encoded by ANPEP) expression was analysed by immunohistochemistry using tissue microarrays representing 267 radical prostatectomy (RP) and 111 conservatively treated (CT) PC patients. Clinical end points were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS), respectively. The ANPEP promoter methylation levels were determined by bisulphite sequencing or MethyLight analysis in 278 nonmalignant and PC tissue samples, and in cell lines. RESULTS: The APN expression was significantly downregulated in PC compared with nonmalignant prostate tissue samples. Aberrant promoter hypermethylation was frequently observed in PC tissue samples, and 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine induced ANPEP expression in three hypermethylated prostate cell lines, suggesting epigenetic silencing. Negative APN immunoreactivity was significantly associated with short RFS and short CSS in the RP and CT cohort, respectively, independently of routine clinicopathological predictors. Combining APN with a known angiogenesis marker (vascular endothelial growth factor or microvessel density) improved risk prediction significantly in both cohorts. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest negative APN immunoreactivity as a new independent adverse prognostic factor for patients with clinically localised PC and, furthermore, that epigenetic mechanisms are involved in silencing of ANPEP in PC. Nature Publishing Group 2013-02-05 2013-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3566819/ /pubmed/23322201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.549 Text en Copyright © 2013 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
spellingShingle Molecular Diagnostics
Sørensen, K D
Abildgaard, M O
Haldrup, C
Ulhøi, B P
Kristensen, H
Strand, S
Parker, C
Høyer, S
Borre, M
Ørntoft, T F
Prognostic significance of aberrantly silenced ANPEP expression in prostate cancer
title Prognostic significance of aberrantly silenced ANPEP expression in prostate cancer
title_full Prognostic significance of aberrantly silenced ANPEP expression in prostate cancer
title_fullStr Prognostic significance of aberrantly silenced ANPEP expression in prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic significance of aberrantly silenced ANPEP expression in prostate cancer
title_short Prognostic significance of aberrantly silenced ANPEP expression in prostate cancer
title_sort prognostic significance of aberrantly silenced anpep expression in prostate cancer
topic Molecular Diagnostics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3566819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23322201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.549
work_keys_str_mv AT sørensenkd prognosticsignificanceofaberrantlysilencedanpepexpressioninprostatecancer
AT abildgaardmo prognosticsignificanceofaberrantlysilencedanpepexpressioninprostatecancer
AT haldrupc prognosticsignificanceofaberrantlysilencedanpepexpressioninprostatecancer
AT ulhøibp prognosticsignificanceofaberrantlysilencedanpepexpressioninprostatecancer
AT kristensenh prognosticsignificanceofaberrantlysilencedanpepexpressioninprostatecancer
AT strands prognosticsignificanceofaberrantlysilencedanpepexpressioninprostatecancer
AT parkerc prognosticsignificanceofaberrantlysilencedanpepexpressioninprostatecancer
AT høyers prognosticsignificanceofaberrantlysilencedanpepexpressioninprostatecancer
AT borrem prognosticsignificanceofaberrantlysilencedanpepexpressioninprostatecancer
AT ørntofttf prognosticsignificanceofaberrantlysilencedanpepexpressioninprostatecancer