Cargando…
A Comparison between Brachial and Echocardiographic Systolic Time Intervals
Systolic time interval (STI) is an established noninvasive technique for the assessment of cardiac function. Brachial STIs can be automatically determined by an ankle-brachial index (ABI)-form device. The aims of this study are to evaluate whether the STIs measured from ABI-form device can represent...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3567004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23409059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055840 |
_version_ | 1782258639921217536 |
---|---|
author | Su, Ho-Ming Lin, Tsung-Hsien Hsu, Po-Chao Chu, Chun-Yuan Lee, Wen-Hsien Chen, Szu-Chia Lee, Chee-Siong Voon, Wen-Chol Lai, Wen-Ter Sheu, Sheng-Hsiung |
author_facet | Su, Ho-Ming Lin, Tsung-Hsien Hsu, Po-Chao Chu, Chun-Yuan Lee, Wen-Hsien Chen, Szu-Chia Lee, Chee-Siong Voon, Wen-Chol Lai, Wen-Ter Sheu, Sheng-Hsiung |
author_sort | Su, Ho-Ming |
collection | PubMed |
description | Systolic time interval (STI) is an established noninvasive technique for the assessment of cardiac function. Brachial STIs can be automatically determined by an ankle-brachial index (ABI)-form device. The aims of this study are to evaluate whether the STIs measured from ABI-form device can represent those measured from echocardiography and to compare the diagnostic values of brachial and echocardiographic STIs in the prediction of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%. A total of 849 patients were included in the study. Brachial pre-ejection period (bPEP) and brachial ejection time (bET) were measured using an ABI-form device and pre-ejection period (PEP) and ejection time (ET) were measured from echocardiography. Agreement was assessed by correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plot. Brachial STIs had a significant correlation with echocardiographic STIs (r = 0.644, P<0.001 for bPEP and PEP; r = 0.850, P<0.001 for bET and ET; r = 0.708, P<0.001 for bPEP/bET and PEP/ET). The disagreement between brachial and echocardiographic STIs (brachial STIs minus echocardiographic STIs) was 28.55 ms for bPEP and PEP, -4.15 ms for bET and ET and -0.11 for bPEP/bET and PEP/ET. The areas under the curve for bPEP/bET and PEP/ET in the prediction of LVEF <50% were 0.771 and 0.765, respectively. Brachial STIs were good alternatives to STIs obtained from echocardiography and also helpful in prediction of LVEF <50%. Brachial STIs automatically obtained from an ABI-form device may be helpful for evaluation of left ventricular systolic dysfunction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3567004 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35670042013-02-13 A Comparison between Brachial and Echocardiographic Systolic Time Intervals Su, Ho-Ming Lin, Tsung-Hsien Hsu, Po-Chao Chu, Chun-Yuan Lee, Wen-Hsien Chen, Szu-Chia Lee, Chee-Siong Voon, Wen-Chol Lai, Wen-Ter Sheu, Sheng-Hsiung PLoS One Research Article Systolic time interval (STI) is an established noninvasive technique for the assessment of cardiac function. Brachial STIs can be automatically determined by an ankle-brachial index (ABI)-form device. The aims of this study are to evaluate whether the STIs measured from ABI-form device can represent those measured from echocardiography and to compare the diagnostic values of brachial and echocardiographic STIs in the prediction of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%. A total of 849 patients were included in the study. Brachial pre-ejection period (bPEP) and brachial ejection time (bET) were measured using an ABI-form device and pre-ejection period (PEP) and ejection time (ET) were measured from echocardiography. Agreement was assessed by correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plot. Brachial STIs had a significant correlation with echocardiographic STIs (r = 0.644, P<0.001 for bPEP and PEP; r = 0.850, P<0.001 for bET and ET; r = 0.708, P<0.001 for bPEP/bET and PEP/ET). The disagreement between brachial and echocardiographic STIs (brachial STIs minus echocardiographic STIs) was 28.55 ms for bPEP and PEP, -4.15 ms for bET and ET and -0.11 for bPEP/bET and PEP/ET. The areas under the curve for bPEP/bET and PEP/ET in the prediction of LVEF <50% were 0.771 and 0.765, respectively. Brachial STIs were good alternatives to STIs obtained from echocardiography and also helpful in prediction of LVEF <50%. Brachial STIs automatically obtained from an ABI-form device may be helpful for evaluation of left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Public Library of Science 2013-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3567004/ /pubmed/23409059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055840 Text en © 2013 Su et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Su, Ho-Ming Lin, Tsung-Hsien Hsu, Po-Chao Chu, Chun-Yuan Lee, Wen-Hsien Chen, Szu-Chia Lee, Chee-Siong Voon, Wen-Chol Lai, Wen-Ter Sheu, Sheng-Hsiung A Comparison between Brachial and Echocardiographic Systolic Time Intervals |
title | A Comparison between Brachial and Echocardiographic Systolic Time Intervals |
title_full | A Comparison between Brachial and Echocardiographic Systolic Time Intervals |
title_fullStr | A Comparison between Brachial and Echocardiographic Systolic Time Intervals |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison between Brachial and Echocardiographic Systolic Time Intervals |
title_short | A Comparison between Brachial and Echocardiographic Systolic Time Intervals |
title_sort | comparison between brachial and echocardiographic systolic time intervals |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3567004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23409059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055840 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT suhoming acomparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals AT lintsunghsien acomparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals AT hsupochao acomparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals AT chuchunyuan acomparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals AT leewenhsien acomparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals AT chenszuchia acomparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals AT leecheesiong acomparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals AT voonwenchol acomparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals AT laiwenter acomparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals AT sheushenghsiung acomparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals AT suhoming comparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals AT lintsunghsien comparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals AT hsupochao comparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals AT chuchunyuan comparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals AT leewenhsien comparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals AT chenszuchia comparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals AT leecheesiong comparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals AT voonwenchol comparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals AT laiwenter comparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals AT sheushenghsiung comparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals |