Cargando…

A Comparison between Brachial and Echocardiographic Systolic Time Intervals

Systolic time interval (STI) is an established noninvasive technique for the assessment of cardiac function. Brachial STIs can be automatically determined by an ankle-brachial index (ABI)-form device. The aims of this study are to evaluate whether the STIs measured from ABI-form device can represent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Su, Ho-Ming, Lin, Tsung-Hsien, Hsu, Po-Chao, Chu, Chun-Yuan, Lee, Wen-Hsien, Chen, Szu-Chia, Lee, Chee-Siong, Voon, Wen-Chol, Lai, Wen-Ter, Sheu, Sheng-Hsiung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3567004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23409059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055840
_version_ 1782258639921217536
author Su, Ho-Ming
Lin, Tsung-Hsien
Hsu, Po-Chao
Chu, Chun-Yuan
Lee, Wen-Hsien
Chen, Szu-Chia
Lee, Chee-Siong
Voon, Wen-Chol
Lai, Wen-Ter
Sheu, Sheng-Hsiung
author_facet Su, Ho-Ming
Lin, Tsung-Hsien
Hsu, Po-Chao
Chu, Chun-Yuan
Lee, Wen-Hsien
Chen, Szu-Chia
Lee, Chee-Siong
Voon, Wen-Chol
Lai, Wen-Ter
Sheu, Sheng-Hsiung
author_sort Su, Ho-Ming
collection PubMed
description Systolic time interval (STI) is an established noninvasive technique for the assessment of cardiac function. Brachial STIs can be automatically determined by an ankle-brachial index (ABI)-form device. The aims of this study are to evaluate whether the STIs measured from ABI-form device can represent those measured from echocardiography and to compare the diagnostic values of brachial and echocardiographic STIs in the prediction of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%. A total of 849 patients were included in the study. Brachial pre-ejection period (bPEP) and brachial ejection time (bET) were measured using an ABI-form device and pre-ejection period (PEP) and ejection time (ET) were measured from echocardiography. Agreement was assessed by correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plot. Brachial STIs had a significant correlation with echocardiographic STIs (r = 0.644, P<0.001 for bPEP and PEP; r  = 0.850, P<0.001 for bET and ET; r = 0.708, P<0.001 for bPEP/bET and PEP/ET). The disagreement between brachial and echocardiographic STIs (brachial STIs minus echocardiographic STIs) was 28.55 ms for bPEP and PEP, -4.15 ms for bET and ET and -0.11 for bPEP/bET and PEP/ET. The areas under the curve for bPEP/bET and PEP/ET in the prediction of LVEF <50% were 0.771 and 0.765, respectively. Brachial STIs were good alternatives to STIs obtained from echocardiography and also helpful in prediction of LVEF <50%. Brachial STIs automatically obtained from an ABI-form device may be helpful for evaluation of left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3567004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35670042013-02-13 A Comparison between Brachial and Echocardiographic Systolic Time Intervals Su, Ho-Ming Lin, Tsung-Hsien Hsu, Po-Chao Chu, Chun-Yuan Lee, Wen-Hsien Chen, Szu-Chia Lee, Chee-Siong Voon, Wen-Chol Lai, Wen-Ter Sheu, Sheng-Hsiung PLoS One Research Article Systolic time interval (STI) is an established noninvasive technique for the assessment of cardiac function. Brachial STIs can be automatically determined by an ankle-brachial index (ABI)-form device. The aims of this study are to evaluate whether the STIs measured from ABI-form device can represent those measured from echocardiography and to compare the diagnostic values of brachial and echocardiographic STIs in the prediction of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%. A total of 849 patients were included in the study. Brachial pre-ejection period (bPEP) and brachial ejection time (bET) were measured using an ABI-form device and pre-ejection period (PEP) and ejection time (ET) were measured from echocardiography. Agreement was assessed by correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plot. Brachial STIs had a significant correlation with echocardiographic STIs (r = 0.644, P<0.001 for bPEP and PEP; r  = 0.850, P<0.001 for bET and ET; r = 0.708, P<0.001 for bPEP/bET and PEP/ET). The disagreement between brachial and echocardiographic STIs (brachial STIs minus echocardiographic STIs) was 28.55 ms for bPEP and PEP, -4.15 ms for bET and ET and -0.11 for bPEP/bET and PEP/ET. The areas under the curve for bPEP/bET and PEP/ET in the prediction of LVEF <50% were 0.771 and 0.765, respectively. Brachial STIs were good alternatives to STIs obtained from echocardiography and also helpful in prediction of LVEF <50%. Brachial STIs automatically obtained from an ABI-form device may be helpful for evaluation of left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Public Library of Science 2013-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3567004/ /pubmed/23409059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055840 Text en © 2013 Su et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Su, Ho-Ming
Lin, Tsung-Hsien
Hsu, Po-Chao
Chu, Chun-Yuan
Lee, Wen-Hsien
Chen, Szu-Chia
Lee, Chee-Siong
Voon, Wen-Chol
Lai, Wen-Ter
Sheu, Sheng-Hsiung
A Comparison between Brachial and Echocardiographic Systolic Time Intervals
title A Comparison between Brachial and Echocardiographic Systolic Time Intervals
title_full A Comparison between Brachial and Echocardiographic Systolic Time Intervals
title_fullStr A Comparison between Brachial and Echocardiographic Systolic Time Intervals
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison between Brachial and Echocardiographic Systolic Time Intervals
title_short A Comparison between Brachial and Echocardiographic Systolic Time Intervals
title_sort comparison between brachial and echocardiographic systolic time intervals
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3567004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23409059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055840
work_keys_str_mv AT suhoming acomparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals
AT lintsunghsien acomparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals
AT hsupochao acomparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals
AT chuchunyuan acomparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals
AT leewenhsien acomparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals
AT chenszuchia acomparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals
AT leecheesiong acomparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals
AT voonwenchol acomparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals
AT laiwenter acomparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals
AT sheushenghsiung acomparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals
AT suhoming comparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals
AT lintsunghsien comparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals
AT hsupochao comparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals
AT chuchunyuan comparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals
AT leewenhsien comparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals
AT chenszuchia comparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals
AT leecheesiong comparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals
AT voonwenchol comparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals
AT laiwenter comparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals
AT sheushenghsiung comparisonbetweenbrachialandechocardiographicsystolictimeintervals