Cargando…

Modelling the evolution of genetic instability during tumour progression

The role of genetic instability in driving carcinogenesis remains controversial. Genetic instability should accelerate carcinogenesis by increasing the rate of advantageous driver mutations; however, genetic instability can also potentially retard tumour growth by increasing the rate of deleterious...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: S Datta, Ruchira, Gutteridge, Alice, Swanton, Charles, Maley, Carlo C, Graham, Trevor A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3567468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23396531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12024
_version_ 1782258707491454976
author S Datta, Ruchira
Gutteridge, Alice
Swanton, Charles
Maley, Carlo C
Graham, Trevor A
author_facet S Datta, Ruchira
Gutteridge, Alice
Swanton, Charles
Maley, Carlo C
Graham, Trevor A
author_sort S Datta, Ruchira
collection PubMed
description The role of genetic instability in driving carcinogenesis remains controversial. Genetic instability should accelerate carcinogenesis by increasing the rate of advantageous driver mutations; however, genetic instability can also potentially retard tumour growth by increasing the rate of deleterious mutation. As such, it is unclear whether genetically unstable clones would tend to be more selectively advantageous than their genetically stable counterparts within a growing tumour. Here, we show the circumstances where genetic instability evolves during tumour progression towards cancer. We employ a Wright–Fisher type model that describes the evolution of tumour subclones. Clones can acquire both advantageous and deleterious mutations, and mutator mutations that increase a cell's intrinsic mutation rate. Within the model, cancers evolve with a mutator phenotype when driver mutations bestow only moderate increases in fitness: very strong or weak selection for driver mutations suppresses the evolution of a mutator phenotype. Genetic instability occurs secondarily to selectively advantageous driver mutations. Deleterious mutations have relatively little effect on the evolution of genetic instability unless selection for additional driver mutations is very weak or if deleterious mutations are very common. Our model provides a framework for studying the evolution of genetic instability in tumour progression. Our analysis highlights the central role of selection in shaping patterns of mutation in carcinogenesis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3567468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35674682013-02-08 Modelling the evolution of genetic instability during tumour progression S Datta, Ruchira Gutteridge, Alice Swanton, Charles Maley, Carlo C Graham, Trevor A Evol Appl Original Articles The role of genetic instability in driving carcinogenesis remains controversial. Genetic instability should accelerate carcinogenesis by increasing the rate of advantageous driver mutations; however, genetic instability can also potentially retard tumour growth by increasing the rate of deleterious mutation. As such, it is unclear whether genetically unstable clones would tend to be more selectively advantageous than their genetically stable counterparts within a growing tumour. Here, we show the circumstances where genetic instability evolves during tumour progression towards cancer. We employ a Wright–Fisher type model that describes the evolution of tumour subclones. Clones can acquire both advantageous and deleterious mutations, and mutator mutations that increase a cell's intrinsic mutation rate. Within the model, cancers evolve with a mutator phenotype when driver mutations bestow only moderate increases in fitness: very strong or weak selection for driver mutations suppresses the evolution of a mutator phenotype. Genetic instability occurs secondarily to selectively advantageous driver mutations. Deleterious mutations have relatively little effect on the evolution of genetic instability unless selection for additional driver mutations is very weak or if deleterious mutations are very common. Our model provides a framework for studying the evolution of genetic instability in tumour progression. Our analysis highlights the central role of selection in shaping patterns of mutation in carcinogenesis. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013-01 2012-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3567468/ /pubmed/23396531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12024 Text en Journal compilation © 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Original Articles
S Datta, Ruchira
Gutteridge, Alice
Swanton, Charles
Maley, Carlo C
Graham, Trevor A
Modelling the evolution of genetic instability during tumour progression
title Modelling the evolution of genetic instability during tumour progression
title_full Modelling the evolution of genetic instability during tumour progression
title_fullStr Modelling the evolution of genetic instability during tumour progression
title_full_unstemmed Modelling the evolution of genetic instability during tumour progression
title_short Modelling the evolution of genetic instability during tumour progression
title_sort modelling the evolution of genetic instability during tumour progression
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3567468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23396531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12024
work_keys_str_mv AT sdattaruchira modellingtheevolutionofgeneticinstabilityduringtumourprogression
AT gutteridgealice modellingtheevolutionofgeneticinstabilityduringtumourprogression
AT swantoncharles modellingtheevolutionofgeneticinstabilityduringtumourprogression
AT maleycarloc modellingtheevolutionofgeneticinstabilityduringtumourprogression
AT grahamtrevora modellingtheevolutionofgeneticinstabilityduringtumourprogression