Cargando…

Improving prostate cancer detection in veterans through the development of a clinical decision rule for prostate biopsy

BACKGROUND: We sought to improve prostate cancer (PC) detection through developing a prostate biopsy clinical decision rule (PBCDR), based on an elevated PSA and laboratory biomarkers. This decision rule could be used after initial PC screening, providing the patient and clinician information to con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hill, Owen T, Mason, Thomas J, Schwartz, Skai W, Foulis, Philip R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3567946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23356551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-13-6
_version_ 1782258733417496576
author Hill, Owen T
Mason, Thomas J
Schwartz, Skai W
Foulis, Philip R
author_facet Hill, Owen T
Mason, Thomas J
Schwartz, Skai W
Foulis, Philip R
author_sort Hill, Owen T
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We sought to improve prostate cancer (PC) detection through developing a prostate biopsy clinical decision rule (PBCDR), based on an elevated PSA and laboratory biomarkers. This decision rule could be used after initial PC screening, providing the patient and clinician information to consider prior to biopsy. METHODS: This case–control study evaluated men from the Tampa, Florida, James A. Haley (JH) Veteran’s Administration (VA) (N = 1,378), from January 1, 1998, through April 15, 2005. To assess the PBCDR we did all of the following: 1) Identified biomarkers that are related to PC and have the capability of improving the efficiency of PC screening; 2) Developed statistical models to determine which can best predict the probability of PC; 3) Compared each potential model to PSA alone using Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curves, to evaluate for improved overall effectiveness in PC detection and reduction in (negative) biopsies; and 4) Evaluated dose–response relationships between specified lab biomarkers (surrogates for extra-prostatic disease development) and PC progression. RESULTS: The following biomarkers were related to PC: hemoglobin (HGB) (OR = 1.42 95% CI 1.27, 1.59); red blood cell (RBC) count (OR = 2.52 95% CI 1.67, 3.78); PSA (OR = 1.04 95% CI 1.03, 1.05); and, creatinine (OR = 1.55 95% CI 1.12, 2.15). Comparing all PC stages versus non-cancerous conditions, the ROC curve area under the curve (AUC) enlarged (increasing the probability of correctly classifying PC): PSA (alone) 0.59 (95% CI 0.55, 0.61); PBCDR model 0.68 (95% CI 0.65, 0.71), and the positive predictive value (PPV) increased: PSA 44.7%; PBCDR model 61.8%. Comparing PC (stages II, III, IV) vs. other, the ROC AUC increased: PSA (alone) 0.63 (95% CI 0.58, 0.66); PBCDR model 0.72 (95% CI 0.68, 0.75), and the PPV increased: 20.6% (PSA); PBCDR model 55.3%. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest evaluating certain common biomarkers in conjunction with PSA may improve PC prediction prior to biopsy. Moreover, these biomarkers may be more helpful in detecting clinically relevant PC. Follow-up studies should begin with replicating the study on different U.S. VA patients involving multiple practices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3567946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35679462013-02-12 Improving prostate cancer detection in veterans through the development of a clinical decision rule for prostate biopsy Hill, Owen T Mason, Thomas J Schwartz, Skai W Foulis, Philip R BMC Urol Research Article BACKGROUND: We sought to improve prostate cancer (PC) detection through developing a prostate biopsy clinical decision rule (PBCDR), based on an elevated PSA and laboratory biomarkers. This decision rule could be used after initial PC screening, providing the patient and clinician information to consider prior to biopsy. METHODS: This case–control study evaluated men from the Tampa, Florida, James A. Haley (JH) Veteran’s Administration (VA) (N = 1,378), from January 1, 1998, through April 15, 2005. To assess the PBCDR we did all of the following: 1) Identified biomarkers that are related to PC and have the capability of improving the efficiency of PC screening; 2) Developed statistical models to determine which can best predict the probability of PC; 3) Compared each potential model to PSA alone using Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curves, to evaluate for improved overall effectiveness in PC detection and reduction in (negative) biopsies; and 4) Evaluated dose–response relationships between specified lab biomarkers (surrogates for extra-prostatic disease development) and PC progression. RESULTS: The following biomarkers were related to PC: hemoglobin (HGB) (OR = 1.42 95% CI 1.27, 1.59); red blood cell (RBC) count (OR = 2.52 95% CI 1.67, 3.78); PSA (OR = 1.04 95% CI 1.03, 1.05); and, creatinine (OR = 1.55 95% CI 1.12, 2.15). Comparing all PC stages versus non-cancerous conditions, the ROC curve area under the curve (AUC) enlarged (increasing the probability of correctly classifying PC): PSA (alone) 0.59 (95% CI 0.55, 0.61); PBCDR model 0.68 (95% CI 0.65, 0.71), and the positive predictive value (PPV) increased: PSA 44.7%; PBCDR model 61.8%. Comparing PC (stages II, III, IV) vs. other, the ROC AUC increased: PSA (alone) 0.63 (95% CI 0.58, 0.66); PBCDR model 0.72 (95% CI 0.68, 0.75), and the PPV increased: 20.6% (PSA); PBCDR model 55.3%. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest evaluating certain common biomarkers in conjunction with PSA may improve PC prediction prior to biopsy. Moreover, these biomarkers may be more helpful in detecting clinically relevant PC. Follow-up studies should begin with replicating the study on different U.S. VA patients involving multiple practices. BioMed Central 2013-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3567946/ /pubmed/23356551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-13-6 Text en Copyright ©2013 Hill et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hill, Owen T
Mason, Thomas J
Schwartz, Skai W
Foulis, Philip R
Improving prostate cancer detection in veterans through the development of a clinical decision rule for prostate biopsy
title Improving prostate cancer detection in veterans through the development of a clinical decision rule for prostate biopsy
title_full Improving prostate cancer detection in veterans through the development of a clinical decision rule for prostate biopsy
title_fullStr Improving prostate cancer detection in veterans through the development of a clinical decision rule for prostate biopsy
title_full_unstemmed Improving prostate cancer detection in veterans through the development of a clinical decision rule for prostate biopsy
title_short Improving prostate cancer detection in veterans through the development of a clinical decision rule for prostate biopsy
title_sort improving prostate cancer detection in veterans through the development of a clinical decision rule for prostate biopsy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3567946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23356551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-13-6
work_keys_str_mv AT hillowent improvingprostatecancerdetectioninveteransthroughthedevelopmentofaclinicaldecisionruleforprostatebiopsy
AT masonthomasj improvingprostatecancerdetectioninveteransthroughthedevelopmentofaclinicaldecisionruleforprostatebiopsy
AT schwartzskaiw improvingprostatecancerdetectioninveteransthroughthedevelopmentofaclinicaldecisionruleforprostatebiopsy
AT foulisphilipr improvingprostatecancerdetectioninveteransthroughthedevelopmentofaclinicaldecisionruleforprostatebiopsy