Cargando…

The young osteoarthritic knee: dilemmas in management

As a result of increasing life expectancies, continuing physical careers, lifestyles into later life and rising obesity levels, the number of younger patients presenting with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is increasing. When conservative management options have been exhausted, the challenge for th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sutton, Paul M, Holloway, Edward S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3567986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23331908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-14
_version_ 1782258742892429312
author Sutton, Paul M
Holloway, Edward S
author_facet Sutton, Paul M
Holloway, Edward S
author_sort Sutton, Paul M
collection PubMed
description As a result of increasing life expectancies, continuing physical careers, lifestyles into later life and rising obesity levels, the number of younger patients presenting with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is increasing. When conservative management options have been exhausted, the challenge for the orthopedic surgeon is to offer a procedure that will relieve symptoms and allow a return to a high level of function but not compromise future surgery that may be required as disease progresses or prostheses fail and require revision. We discuss the options available to this group of patients and the relative benefits and potential negative points of each. Total knee replacement (TKR) in the young patient is associated with high risk of early failure and the need for future revision surgery. After TKR, most surgeons advise limitation of sporting activities. If osteoarthritis is limited to only one compartment in the knee there may be surgical options other than TKR. Osteotomy above or below the knee may be considered and works by redirecting the load passing through the joint into the relatively unaffected compartment. A unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) or patella-femoral joint (PFJ) replacement only replaces the articular surfaces in the affected compartment, leaving the unaffected compartments untouched with better preservation of the soft tissues. Which of these options is best for a particular patient depends upon the patient's symptoms, precise pathology, lifestyle, and expectations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3567986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35679862013-02-13 The young osteoarthritic knee: dilemmas in management Sutton, Paul M Holloway, Edward S BMC Med Opinion As a result of increasing life expectancies, continuing physical careers, lifestyles into later life and rising obesity levels, the number of younger patients presenting with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is increasing. When conservative management options have been exhausted, the challenge for the orthopedic surgeon is to offer a procedure that will relieve symptoms and allow a return to a high level of function but not compromise future surgery that may be required as disease progresses or prostheses fail and require revision. We discuss the options available to this group of patients and the relative benefits and potential negative points of each. Total knee replacement (TKR) in the young patient is associated with high risk of early failure and the need for future revision surgery. After TKR, most surgeons advise limitation of sporting activities. If osteoarthritis is limited to only one compartment in the knee there may be surgical options other than TKR. Osteotomy above or below the knee may be considered and works by redirecting the load passing through the joint into the relatively unaffected compartment. A unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) or patella-femoral joint (PFJ) replacement only replaces the articular surfaces in the affected compartment, leaving the unaffected compartments untouched with better preservation of the soft tissues. Which of these options is best for a particular patient depends upon the patient's symptoms, precise pathology, lifestyle, and expectations. BioMed Central 2013-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3567986/ /pubmed/23331908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-14 Text en Copyright ©2013 Sutton and Holloway; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Opinion
Sutton, Paul M
Holloway, Edward S
The young osteoarthritic knee: dilemmas in management
title The young osteoarthritic knee: dilemmas in management
title_full The young osteoarthritic knee: dilemmas in management
title_fullStr The young osteoarthritic knee: dilemmas in management
title_full_unstemmed The young osteoarthritic knee: dilemmas in management
title_short The young osteoarthritic knee: dilemmas in management
title_sort young osteoarthritic knee: dilemmas in management
topic Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3567986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23331908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-14
work_keys_str_mv AT suttonpaulm theyoungosteoarthritickneedilemmasinmanagement
AT hollowayedwards theyoungosteoarthritickneedilemmasinmanagement
AT suttonpaulm youngosteoarthritickneedilemmasinmanagement
AT hollowayedwards youngosteoarthritickneedilemmasinmanagement