Cargando…

Cognitive Interference From Food Cues in Weight Loss Maintainers, Normal Weight, and Obese Individuals

Much attention has been paid to the behavioral characteristics of successful weight loss maintenance, but less is known about the cognitive processes that underlie this process. The purpose of this study was to investigate cognitive interference from food-related cues in long-term weight loss mainta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Phelan, Suzanne, Hassenstab, Jason, McCaffery, Jeanne M., Sweet, Lawrence, Raynor, Hollie A., Cohen, Ronald A., Wing, Rena R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3568684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20539296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/oby.2010.138
_version_ 1782258800319791104
author Phelan, Suzanne
Hassenstab, Jason
McCaffery, Jeanne M.
Sweet, Lawrence
Raynor, Hollie A.
Cohen, Ronald A.
Wing, Rena R.
author_facet Phelan, Suzanne
Hassenstab, Jason
McCaffery, Jeanne M.
Sweet, Lawrence
Raynor, Hollie A.
Cohen, Ronald A.
Wing, Rena R.
author_sort Phelan, Suzanne
collection PubMed
description Much attention has been paid to the behavioral characteristics of successful weight loss maintenance, but less is known about the cognitive processes that underlie this process. The purpose of this study was to investigate cognitive interference from food-related cues in long-term weight loss maintainers (WLM; N = 15) as compared with normal weight (NW; N = 19) and obese (OB; N = 14) controls. A Food Stroop paradigm was used to determine whether successful WLM differed from controls in both the speed and accuracy of color naming words for low-calorie and high-calorie foods. A significant group × condition interaction for reaction time was observed (P = 0.04). In post hoc analyses, no significant differences in reaction time across the three groups were observed for the low-calorie foods (P = 0.66). However, for the high-calorie foods, WLM showed a significantly slower reaction time than the NW (0.04) and OB (0.009) groups (885 ± 17.6, 834 ± 15.8, 816 ± 18.3 ms, respectively). No significant group differences were seen for number of correct trials in 45 s (P = 0.12). The differential interference among WLM did not appear to generalize to other types of distracters (i.e., nonfood). Overall, findings from this study suggest that WLM differ from OB and NW controls in their cognitive responses to high-calorie food cues. Future research is needed to better understand why this bias exists and whether and how interventions can change cognitive processes to better facilitate long-term weight control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3568684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35686842013-02-11 Cognitive Interference From Food Cues in Weight Loss Maintainers, Normal Weight, and Obese Individuals Phelan, Suzanne Hassenstab, Jason McCaffery, Jeanne M. Sweet, Lawrence Raynor, Hollie A. Cohen, Ronald A. Wing, Rena R. Obesity (Silver Spring) Behavior and Psychology Much attention has been paid to the behavioral characteristics of successful weight loss maintenance, but less is known about the cognitive processes that underlie this process. The purpose of this study was to investigate cognitive interference from food-related cues in long-term weight loss maintainers (WLM; N = 15) as compared with normal weight (NW; N = 19) and obese (OB; N = 14) controls. A Food Stroop paradigm was used to determine whether successful WLM differed from controls in both the speed and accuracy of color naming words for low-calorie and high-calorie foods. A significant group × condition interaction for reaction time was observed (P = 0.04). In post hoc analyses, no significant differences in reaction time across the three groups were observed for the low-calorie foods (P = 0.66). However, for the high-calorie foods, WLM showed a significantly slower reaction time than the NW (0.04) and OB (0.009) groups (885 ± 17.6, 834 ± 15.8, 816 ± 18.3 ms, respectively). No significant group differences were seen for number of correct trials in 45 s (P = 0.12). The differential interference among WLM did not appear to generalize to other types of distracters (i.e., nonfood). Overall, findings from this study suggest that WLM differ from OB and NW controls in their cognitive responses to high-calorie food cues. Future research is needed to better understand why this bias exists and whether and how interventions can change cognitive processes to better facilitate long-term weight control. Nature Publishing Group 2011-01 2010-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3568684/ /pubmed/20539296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/oby.2010.138 Text en Copyright © 2011 The Obesity Society
spellingShingle Behavior and Psychology
Phelan, Suzanne
Hassenstab, Jason
McCaffery, Jeanne M.
Sweet, Lawrence
Raynor, Hollie A.
Cohen, Ronald A.
Wing, Rena R.
Cognitive Interference From Food Cues in Weight Loss Maintainers, Normal Weight, and Obese Individuals
title Cognitive Interference From Food Cues in Weight Loss Maintainers, Normal Weight, and Obese Individuals
title_full Cognitive Interference From Food Cues in Weight Loss Maintainers, Normal Weight, and Obese Individuals
title_fullStr Cognitive Interference From Food Cues in Weight Loss Maintainers, Normal Weight, and Obese Individuals
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive Interference From Food Cues in Weight Loss Maintainers, Normal Weight, and Obese Individuals
title_short Cognitive Interference From Food Cues in Weight Loss Maintainers, Normal Weight, and Obese Individuals
title_sort cognitive interference from food cues in weight loss maintainers, normal weight, and obese individuals
topic Behavior and Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3568684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20539296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/oby.2010.138
work_keys_str_mv AT phelansuzanne cognitiveinterferencefromfoodcuesinweightlossmaintainersnormalweightandobeseindividuals
AT hassenstabjason cognitiveinterferencefromfoodcuesinweightlossmaintainersnormalweightandobeseindividuals
AT mccafferyjeannem cognitiveinterferencefromfoodcuesinweightlossmaintainersnormalweightandobeseindividuals
AT sweetlawrence cognitiveinterferencefromfoodcuesinweightlossmaintainersnormalweightandobeseindividuals
AT raynorholliea cognitiveinterferencefromfoodcuesinweightlossmaintainersnormalweightandobeseindividuals
AT cohenronalda cognitiveinterferencefromfoodcuesinweightlossmaintainersnormalweightandobeseindividuals
AT wingrenar cognitiveinterferencefromfoodcuesinweightlossmaintainersnormalweightandobeseindividuals