Cargando…
Biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature
Species introductions of anthropogenic origins are a major aspect of rapid ecological change globally. Research on biological invasions has generated a large literature on many different aspects of this phenomenon. Here, we describe and categorize some aspects of this literature, to better understan...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3568853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23404636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.431 |
_version_ | 1782258816419627008 |
---|---|
author | Lowry, Edward Rollinson, Emily J Laybourn, Adam J Scott, Tracy E Aiello-Lammens, Matthew E Gray, Sarah M Mickley, James Gurevitch, Jessica |
author_facet | Lowry, Edward Rollinson, Emily J Laybourn, Adam J Scott, Tracy E Aiello-Lammens, Matthew E Gray, Sarah M Mickley, James Gurevitch, Jessica |
author_sort | Lowry, Edward |
collection | PubMed |
description | Species introductions of anthropogenic origins are a major aspect of rapid ecological change globally. Research on biological invasions has generated a large literature on many different aspects of this phenomenon. Here, we describe and categorize some aspects of this literature, to better understand what has been studied and what we know, mapping well-studied areas and important gaps. To do so, we employ the techniques of systematic reviewing widely adopted in other scientific disciplines, to further the use of approaches in reviewing the literature that are as scientific, repeatable, and transparent as those employed in a primary study. We identified 2398 relevant studies in a field synopsis of the biological invasions literature. A majority of these studies (58%) were concerned with hypotheses for causes of biological invasions, while studies on impacts of invasions were the next most common (32% of the publications). We examined 1537 papers in greater detail in a systematic review. Superior competitive abilities of invaders, environmental disturbance, and invaded community species richness were the most common hypotheses examined. Most studies examined only a single hypothesis. Almost half of the papers were field observational studies. Studies of terrestrial invasions dominate the literature, with most of these concerning plant invasions. The focus of the literature overall is uneven, with important gaps in areas of theoretical and practical importance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3568853 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35688532013-02-12 Biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature Lowry, Edward Rollinson, Emily J Laybourn, Adam J Scott, Tracy E Aiello-Lammens, Matthew E Gray, Sarah M Mickley, James Gurevitch, Jessica Ecol Evol Reviews Species introductions of anthropogenic origins are a major aspect of rapid ecological change globally. Research on biological invasions has generated a large literature on many different aspects of this phenomenon. Here, we describe and categorize some aspects of this literature, to better understand what has been studied and what we know, mapping well-studied areas and important gaps. To do so, we employ the techniques of systematic reviewing widely adopted in other scientific disciplines, to further the use of approaches in reviewing the literature that are as scientific, repeatable, and transparent as those employed in a primary study. We identified 2398 relevant studies in a field synopsis of the biological invasions literature. A majority of these studies (58%) were concerned with hypotheses for causes of biological invasions, while studies on impacts of invasions were the next most common (32% of the publications). We examined 1537 papers in greater detail in a systematic review. Superior competitive abilities of invaders, environmental disturbance, and invaded community species richness were the most common hypotheses examined. Most studies examined only a single hypothesis. Almost half of the papers were field observational studies. Studies of terrestrial invasions dominate the literature, with most of these concerning plant invasions. The focus of the literature overall is uneven, with important gaps in areas of theoretical and practical importance. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013-01 2013-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3568853/ /pubmed/23404636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.431 Text en © 2013 Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Lowry, Edward Rollinson, Emily J Laybourn, Adam J Scott, Tracy E Aiello-Lammens, Matthew E Gray, Sarah M Mickley, James Gurevitch, Jessica Biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature |
title | Biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature |
title_full | Biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature |
title_fullStr | Biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature |
title_short | Biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature |
title_sort | biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3568853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23404636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.431 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lowryedward biologicalinvasionsafieldsynopsissystematicreviewanddatabaseoftheliterature AT rollinsonemilyj biologicalinvasionsafieldsynopsissystematicreviewanddatabaseoftheliterature AT laybournadamj biologicalinvasionsafieldsynopsissystematicreviewanddatabaseoftheliterature AT scotttracye biologicalinvasionsafieldsynopsissystematicreviewanddatabaseoftheliterature AT aiellolammensmatthewe biologicalinvasionsafieldsynopsissystematicreviewanddatabaseoftheliterature AT graysarahm biologicalinvasionsafieldsynopsissystematicreviewanddatabaseoftheliterature AT mickleyjames biologicalinvasionsafieldsynopsissystematicreviewanddatabaseoftheliterature AT gurevitchjessica biologicalinvasionsafieldsynopsissystematicreviewanddatabaseoftheliterature |