Cargando…

Biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature

Species introductions of anthropogenic origins are a major aspect of rapid ecological change globally. Research on biological invasions has generated a large literature on many different aspects of this phenomenon. Here, we describe and categorize some aspects of this literature, to better understan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lowry, Edward, Rollinson, Emily J, Laybourn, Adam J, Scott, Tracy E, Aiello-Lammens, Matthew E, Gray, Sarah M, Mickley, James, Gurevitch, Jessica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3568853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23404636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.431
_version_ 1782258816419627008
author Lowry, Edward
Rollinson, Emily J
Laybourn, Adam J
Scott, Tracy E
Aiello-Lammens, Matthew E
Gray, Sarah M
Mickley, James
Gurevitch, Jessica
author_facet Lowry, Edward
Rollinson, Emily J
Laybourn, Adam J
Scott, Tracy E
Aiello-Lammens, Matthew E
Gray, Sarah M
Mickley, James
Gurevitch, Jessica
author_sort Lowry, Edward
collection PubMed
description Species introductions of anthropogenic origins are a major aspect of rapid ecological change globally. Research on biological invasions has generated a large literature on many different aspects of this phenomenon. Here, we describe and categorize some aspects of this literature, to better understand what has been studied and what we know, mapping well-studied areas and important gaps. To do so, we employ the techniques of systematic reviewing widely adopted in other scientific disciplines, to further the use of approaches in reviewing the literature that are as scientific, repeatable, and transparent as those employed in a primary study. We identified 2398 relevant studies in a field synopsis of the biological invasions literature. A majority of these studies (58%) were concerned with hypotheses for causes of biological invasions, while studies on impacts of invasions were the next most common (32% of the publications). We examined 1537 papers in greater detail in a systematic review. Superior competitive abilities of invaders, environmental disturbance, and invaded community species richness were the most common hypotheses examined. Most studies examined only a single hypothesis. Almost half of the papers were field observational studies. Studies of terrestrial invasions dominate the literature, with most of these concerning plant invasions. The focus of the literature overall is uneven, with important gaps in areas of theoretical and practical importance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3568853
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35688532013-02-12 Biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature Lowry, Edward Rollinson, Emily J Laybourn, Adam J Scott, Tracy E Aiello-Lammens, Matthew E Gray, Sarah M Mickley, James Gurevitch, Jessica Ecol Evol Reviews Species introductions of anthropogenic origins are a major aspect of rapid ecological change globally. Research on biological invasions has generated a large literature on many different aspects of this phenomenon. Here, we describe and categorize some aspects of this literature, to better understand what has been studied and what we know, mapping well-studied areas and important gaps. To do so, we employ the techniques of systematic reviewing widely adopted in other scientific disciplines, to further the use of approaches in reviewing the literature that are as scientific, repeatable, and transparent as those employed in a primary study. We identified 2398 relevant studies in a field synopsis of the biological invasions literature. A majority of these studies (58%) were concerned with hypotheses for causes of biological invasions, while studies on impacts of invasions were the next most common (32% of the publications). We examined 1537 papers in greater detail in a systematic review. Superior competitive abilities of invaders, environmental disturbance, and invaded community species richness were the most common hypotheses examined. Most studies examined only a single hypothesis. Almost half of the papers were field observational studies. Studies of terrestrial invasions dominate the literature, with most of these concerning plant invasions. The focus of the literature overall is uneven, with important gaps in areas of theoretical and practical importance. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013-01 2013-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3568853/ /pubmed/23404636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.431 Text en © 2013 Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Reviews
Lowry, Edward
Rollinson, Emily J
Laybourn, Adam J
Scott, Tracy E
Aiello-Lammens, Matthew E
Gray, Sarah M
Mickley, James
Gurevitch, Jessica
Biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature
title Biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature
title_full Biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature
title_fullStr Biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature
title_short Biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature
title_sort biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3568853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23404636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.431
work_keys_str_mv AT lowryedward biologicalinvasionsafieldsynopsissystematicreviewanddatabaseoftheliterature
AT rollinsonemilyj biologicalinvasionsafieldsynopsissystematicreviewanddatabaseoftheliterature
AT laybournadamj biologicalinvasionsafieldsynopsissystematicreviewanddatabaseoftheliterature
AT scotttracye biologicalinvasionsafieldsynopsissystematicreviewanddatabaseoftheliterature
AT aiellolammensmatthewe biologicalinvasionsafieldsynopsissystematicreviewanddatabaseoftheliterature
AT graysarahm biologicalinvasionsafieldsynopsissystematicreviewanddatabaseoftheliterature
AT mickleyjames biologicalinvasionsafieldsynopsissystematicreviewanddatabaseoftheliterature
AT gurevitchjessica biologicalinvasionsafieldsynopsissystematicreviewanddatabaseoftheliterature