Cargando…
Reliability of four experimental mechanical pain tests in children
PURPOSE: In order to study pain in children, it is necessary to determine whether pain measurement tools used in adults are reliable measurements in children. The aim of this study was to explore the intrasession reliability of pressure pain thresholds (PPT) in healthy children. Furthermore, the aim...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3569048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23403523 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S38514 |
_version_ | 1782258830889975808 |
---|---|
author | Soee, Ann-Britt L Thomsen, Lise L Tornoe, Birte Skov, Liselotte |
author_facet | Soee, Ann-Britt L Thomsen, Lise L Tornoe, Birte Skov, Liselotte |
author_sort | Soee, Ann-Britt L |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: In order to study pain in children, it is necessary to determine whether pain measurement tools used in adults are reliable measurements in children. The aim of this study was to explore the intrasession reliability of pressure pain thresholds (PPT) in healthy children. Furthermore, the aim was also to study the intersession reliability of the following four tests: (1) Total Tenderness Score; (2) PPT; (3) Visual Analog Scale score at suprapressure pain threshold; and (4) area under the curve (stimulus–response functions for pressure versus pain). PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five healthy school children, 8–14 years of age, participated. Test 2, PPT, was repeated three times at 2 minute intervals on the same day to estimate PPT intrasession reliability using Cronbach’s alpha. Tests 1–4 were repeated after median 21 (interquartile range 10.5–22) days, and Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to describe the intersession reliability. RESULTS: The PPT test was precise and reliable (Cronbach’s alpha ≥ 0.92). All tests showed a good to excellent correlation between days (intersessions r = 0.66–0.81). There were no indications of significant systematic differences found in any of the four tests between days. CONCLUSION: All tests seemed to be reliable measurements in pain evaluation in healthy children aged 8–14 years. Given the small sample size, this conclusion needs to be confirmed in future studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3569048 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35690482013-02-12 Reliability of four experimental mechanical pain tests in children Soee, Ann-Britt L Thomsen, Lise L Tornoe, Birte Skov, Liselotte J Pain Res Methodology PURPOSE: In order to study pain in children, it is necessary to determine whether pain measurement tools used in adults are reliable measurements in children. The aim of this study was to explore the intrasession reliability of pressure pain thresholds (PPT) in healthy children. Furthermore, the aim was also to study the intersession reliability of the following four tests: (1) Total Tenderness Score; (2) PPT; (3) Visual Analog Scale score at suprapressure pain threshold; and (4) area under the curve (stimulus–response functions for pressure versus pain). PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five healthy school children, 8–14 years of age, participated. Test 2, PPT, was repeated three times at 2 minute intervals on the same day to estimate PPT intrasession reliability using Cronbach’s alpha. Tests 1–4 were repeated after median 21 (interquartile range 10.5–22) days, and Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to describe the intersession reliability. RESULTS: The PPT test was precise and reliable (Cronbach’s alpha ≥ 0.92). All tests showed a good to excellent correlation between days (intersessions r = 0.66–0.81). There were no indications of significant systematic differences found in any of the four tests between days. CONCLUSION: All tests seemed to be reliable measurements in pain evaluation in healthy children aged 8–14 years. Given the small sample size, this conclusion needs to be confirmed in future studies. Dove Medical Press 2013-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3569048/ /pubmed/23403523 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S38514 Text en © 2013 Soee et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Soee, Ann-Britt L Thomsen, Lise L Tornoe, Birte Skov, Liselotte Reliability of four experimental mechanical pain tests in children |
title | Reliability of four experimental mechanical pain tests in children |
title_full | Reliability of four experimental mechanical pain tests in children |
title_fullStr | Reliability of four experimental mechanical pain tests in children |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability of four experimental mechanical pain tests in children |
title_short | Reliability of four experimental mechanical pain tests in children |
title_sort | reliability of four experimental mechanical pain tests in children |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3569048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23403523 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S38514 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soeeannbrittl reliabilityoffourexperimentalmechanicalpaintestsinchildren AT thomsenlisel reliabilityoffourexperimentalmechanicalpaintestsinchildren AT tornoebirte reliabilityoffourexperimentalmechanicalpaintestsinchildren AT skovliselotte reliabilityoffourexperimentalmechanicalpaintestsinchildren |