Cargando…

Reliability of four experimental mechanical pain tests in children

PURPOSE: In order to study pain in children, it is necessary to determine whether pain measurement tools used in adults are reliable measurements in children. The aim of this study was to explore the intrasession reliability of pressure pain thresholds (PPT) in healthy children. Furthermore, the aim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soee, Ann-Britt L, Thomsen, Lise L, Tornoe, Birte, Skov, Liselotte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3569048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23403523
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S38514
_version_ 1782258830889975808
author Soee, Ann-Britt L
Thomsen, Lise L
Tornoe, Birte
Skov, Liselotte
author_facet Soee, Ann-Britt L
Thomsen, Lise L
Tornoe, Birte
Skov, Liselotte
author_sort Soee, Ann-Britt L
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: In order to study pain in children, it is necessary to determine whether pain measurement tools used in adults are reliable measurements in children. The aim of this study was to explore the intrasession reliability of pressure pain thresholds (PPT) in healthy children. Furthermore, the aim was also to study the intersession reliability of the following four tests: (1) Total Tenderness Score; (2) PPT; (3) Visual Analog Scale score at suprapressure pain threshold; and (4) area under the curve (stimulus–response functions for pressure versus pain). PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five healthy school children, 8–14 years of age, participated. Test 2, PPT, was repeated three times at 2 minute intervals on the same day to estimate PPT intrasession reliability using Cronbach’s alpha. Tests 1–4 were repeated after median 21 (interquartile range 10.5–22) days, and Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to describe the intersession reliability. RESULTS: The PPT test was precise and reliable (Cronbach’s alpha ≥ 0.92). All tests showed a good to excellent correlation between days (intersessions r = 0.66–0.81). There were no indications of significant systematic differences found in any of the four tests between days. CONCLUSION: All tests seemed to be reliable measurements in pain evaluation in healthy children aged 8–14 years. Given the small sample size, this conclusion needs to be confirmed in future studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3569048
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35690482013-02-12 Reliability of four experimental mechanical pain tests in children Soee, Ann-Britt L Thomsen, Lise L Tornoe, Birte Skov, Liselotte J Pain Res Methodology PURPOSE: In order to study pain in children, it is necessary to determine whether pain measurement tools used in adults are reliable measurements in children. The aim of this study was to explore the intrasession reliability of pressure pain thresholds (PPT) in healthy children. Furthermore, the aim was also to study the intersession reliability of the following four tests: (1) Total Tenderness Score; (2) PPT; (3) Visual Analog Scale score at suprapressure pain threshold; and (4) area under the curve (stimulus–response functions for pressure versus pain). PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five healthy school children, 8–14 years of age, participated. Test 2, PPT, was repeated three times at 2 minute intervals on the same day to estimate PPT intrasession reliability using Cronbach’s alpha. Tests 1–4 were repeated after median 21 (interquartile range 10.5–22) days, and Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to describe the intersession reliability. RESULTS: The PPT test was precise and reliable (Cronbach’s alpha ≥ 0.92). All tests showed a good to excellent correlation between days (intersessions r = 0.66–0.81). There were no indications of significant systematic differences found in any of the four tests between days. CONCLUSION: All tests seemed to be reliable measurements in pain evaluation in healthy children aged 8–14 years. Given the small sample size, this conclusion needs to be confirmed in future studies. Dove Medical Press 2013-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3569048/ /pubmed/23403523 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S38514 Text en © 2013 Soee et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology
Soee, Ann-Britt L
Thomsen, Lise L
Tornoe, Birte
Skov, Liselotte
Reliability of four experimental mechanical pain tests in children
title Reliability of four experimental mechanical pain tests in children
title_full Reliability of four experimental mechanical pain tests in children
title_fullStr Reliability of four experimental mechanical pain tests in children
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of four experimental mechanical pain tests in children
title_short Reliability of four experimental mechanical pain tests in children
title_sort reliability of four experimental mechanical pain tests in children
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3569048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23403523
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S38514
work_keys_str_mv AT soeeannbrittl reliabilityoffourexperimentalmechanicalpaintestsinchildren
AT thomsenlisel reliabilityoffourexperimentalmechanicalpaintestsinchildren
AT tornoebirte reliabilityoffourexperimentalmechanicalpaintestsinchildren
AT skovliselotte reliabilityoffourexperimentalmechanicalpaintestsinchildren