Cargando…

Data Disclosure for Chemical Evaluations

Background: Public disclosure of scientific data used by the government to make regulatory decisions for chemicals is a practical step that can enhance public confidence in the scientific basis of such decisions. Objectives: We reviewed the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) current practi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lutter, Randall, Barrow, Craig, Borgert, Christopher J., Conrad, James W., Edwards, Debra, Felsot, Allan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3569678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23228957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1204942
_version_ 1782258943440977920
author Lutter, Randall
Barrow, Craig
Borgert, Christopher J.
Conrad, James W.
Edwards, Debra
Felsot, Allan
author_facet Lutter, Randall
Barrow, Craig
Borgert, Christopher J.
Conrad, James W.
Edwards, Debra
Felsot, Allan
author_sort Lutter, Randall
collection PubMed
description Background: Public disclosure of scientific data used by the government to make regulatory decisions for chemicals is a practical step that can enhance public confidence in the scientific basis of such decisions. Objectives: We reviewed the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) current practices regarding disclosure of data underlying regulatory and policy decisions involving chemicals, including pesticides. We sought to identify additional opportunities for the U.S. EPA to disclose data and, more generally, to promote broad access to data it uses, regardless of origin. Discussion: We recommend that when the U.S. EPA proposes a regulatory determination or other policy decision that relies on scientific research, it should provide sufficient underlying raw data and information about methods to enable reanalysis and attempts to independently reproduce the work, including the sensitivity of results to alternative analyses. This recommendation applies regardless of who conducted the work. If the U.S. EPA is unable to provide such transparency, it should state whether it had full access to all underlying data and methods. A timely version of submitted data cleared of information about confidential business matters and personal privacy should fully meet the standards of transparency described below, including public access sufficient for others to undertake an independent reanalysis. Conclusion: Reliable chemical evaluation is essential for protecting public health and the environment and for ensuring availability of useful chemicals under appropriate conditions. Permitting qualified researchers to endeavor to independently reproduce the analyses used in regulatory determinations of pesticides and other chemicals would increase confidence in the scientific basis of such determinations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3569678
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35696782013-02-14 Data Disclosure for Chemical Evaluations Lutter, Randall Barrow, Craig Borgert, Christopher J. Conrad, James W. Edwards, Debra Felsot, Allan Environ Health Perspect Commentary Background: Public disclosure of scientific data used by the government to make regulatory decisions for chemicals is a practical step that can enhance public confidence in the scientific basis of such decisions. Objectives: We reviewed the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) current practices regarding disclosure of data underlying regulatory and policy decisions involving chemicals, including pesticides. We sought to identify additional opportunities for the U.S. EPA to disclose data and, more generally, to promote broad access to data it uses, regardless of origin. Discussion: We recommend that when the U.S. EPA proposes a regulatory determination or other policy decision that relies on scientific research, it should provide sufficient underlying raw data and information about methods to enable reanalysis and attempts to independently reproduce the work, including the sensitivity of results to alternative analyses. This recommendation applies regardless of who conducted the work. If the U.S. EPA is unable to provide such transparency, it should state whether it had full access to all underlying data and methods. A timely version of submitted data cleared of information about confidential business matters and personal privacy should fully meet the standards of transparency described below, including public access sufficient for others to undertake an independent reanalysis. Conclusion: Reliable chemical evaluation is essential for protecting public health and the environment and for ensuring availability of useful chemicals under appropriate conditions. Permitting qualified researchers to endeavor to independently reproduce the analyses used in regulatory determinations of pesticides and other chemicals would increase confidence in the scientific basis of such determinations. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2012-12-11 2013-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3569678/ /pubmed/23228957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1204942 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, ?Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives?); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Commentary
Lutter, Randall
Barrow, Craig
Borgert, Christopher J.
Conrad, James W.
Edwards, Debra
Felsot, Allan
Data Disclosure for Chemical Evaluations
title Data Disclosure for Chemical Evaluations
title_full Data Disclosure for Chemical Evaluations
title_fullStr Data Disclosure for Chemical Evaluations
title_full_unstemmed Data Disclosure for Chemical Evaluations
title_short Data Disclosure for Chemical Evaluations
title_sort data disclosure for chemical evaluations
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3569678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23228957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1204942
work_keys_str_mv AT lutterrandall datadisclosureforchemicalevaluations
AT barrowcraig datadisclosureforchemicalevaluations
AT borgertchristopherj datadisclosureforchemicalevaluations
AT conradjamesw datadisclosureforchemicalevaluations
AT edwardsdebra datadisclosureforchemicalevaluations
AT felsotallan datadisclosureforchemicalevaluations