Cargando…
Data Disclosure for Chemical Evaluations
Background: Public disclosure of scientific data used by the government to make regulatory decisions for chemicals is a practical step that can enhance public confidence in the scientific basis of such decisions. Objectives: We reviewed the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) current practi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3569678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23228957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1204942 |
_version_ | 1782258943440977920 |
---|---|
author | Lutter, Randall Barrow, Craig Borgert, Christopher J. Conrad, James W. Edwards, Debra Felsot, Allan |
author_facet | Lutter, Randall Barrow, Craig Borgert, Christopher J. Conrad, James W. Edwards, Debra Felsot, Allan |
author_sort | Lutter, Randall |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Public disclosure of scientific data used by the government to make regulatory decisions for chemicals is a practical step that can enhance public confidence in the scientific basis of such decisions. Objectives: We reviewed the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) current practices regarding disclosure of data underlying regulatory and policy decisions involving chemicals, including pesticides. We sought to identify additional opportunities for the U.S. EPA to disclose data and, more generally, to promote broad access to data it uses, regardless of origin. Discussion: We recommend that when the U.S. EPA proposes a regulatory determination or other policy decision that relies on scientific research, it should provide sufficient underlying raw data and information about methods to enable reanalysis and attempts to independently reproduce the work, including the sensitivity of results to alternative analyses. This recommendation applies regardless of who conducted the work. If the U.S. EPA is unable to provide such transparency, it should state whether it had full access to all underlying data and methods. A timely version of submitted data cleared of information about confidential business matters and personal privacy should fully meet the standards of transparency described below, including public access sufficient for others to undertake an independent reanalysis. Conclusion: Reliable chemical evaluation is essential for protecting public health and the environment and for ensuring availability of useful chemicals under appropriate conditions. Permitting qualified researchers to endeavor to independently reproduce the analyses used in regulatory determinations of pesticides and other chemicals would increase confidence in the scientific basis of such determinations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3569678 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35696782013-02-14 Data Disclosure for Chemical Evaluations Lutter, Randall Barrow, Craig Borgert, Christopher J. Conrad, James W. Edwards, Debra Felsot, Allan Environ Health Perspect Commentary Background: Public disclosure of scientific data used by the government to make regulatory decisions for chemicals is a practical step that can enhance public confidence in the scientific basis of such decisions. Objectives: We reviewed the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) current practices regarding disclosure of data underlying regulatory and policy decisions involving chemicals, including pesticides. We sought to identify additional opportunities for the U.S. EPA to disclose data and, more generally, to promote broad access to data it uses, regardless of origin. Discussion: We recommend that when the U.S. EPA proposes a regulatory determination or other policy decision that relies on scientific research, it should provide sufficient underlying raw data and information about methods to enable reanalysis and attempts to independently reproduce the work, including the sensitivity of results to alternative analyses. This recommendation applies regardless of who conducted the work. If the U.S. EPA is unable to provide such transparency, it should state whether it had full access to all underlying data and methods. A timely version of submitted data cleared of information about confidential business matters and personal privacy should fully meet the standards of transparency described below, including public access sufficient for others to undertake an independent reanalysis. Conclusion: Reliable chemical evaluation is essential for protecting public health and the environment and for ensuring availability of useful chemicals under appropriate conditions. Permitting qualified researchers to endeavor to independently reproduce the analyses used in regulatory determinations of pesticides and other chemicals would increase confidence in the scientific basis of such determinations. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2012-12-11 2013-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3569678/ /pubmed/23228957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1204942 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, ?Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives?); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Lutter, Randall Barrow, Craig Borgert, Christopher J. Conrad, James W. Edwards, Debra Felsot, Allan Data Disclosure for Chemical Evaluations |
title | Data Disclosure for Chemical Evaluations |
title_full | Data Disclosure for Chemical Evaluations |
title_fullStr | Data Disclosure for Chemical Evaluations |
title_full_unstemmed | Data Disclosure for Chemical Evaluations |
title_short | Data Disclosure for Chemical Evaluations |
title_sort | data disclosure for chemical evaluations |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3569678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23228957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1204942 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lutterrandall datadisclosureforchemicalevaluations AT barrowcraig datadisclosureforchemicalevaluations AT borgertchristopherj datadisclosureforchemicalevaluations AT conradjamesw datadisclosureforchemicalevaluations AT edwardsdebra datadisclosureforchemicalevaluations AT felsotallan datadisclosureforchemicalevaluations |