Cargando…

A comparison study between CT angiography with 64-multislice spiral computed tomography and selective X-ray coronary angiography

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of 64-multislice spiral computed tomography (64-MSCT) for coronary stenosis compared with selective X-ray coronary angiography (SCA). Patients with chest pain, chest tightness or coronary stenosis received SCA and they acted as the controls....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: CHENG, LUYANG, JING, SHENHONG, ZHANG, YINA
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3570241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23408650
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.905
_version_ 1782259031509827584
author CHENG, LUYANG
JING, SHENHONG
ZHANG, YINA
author_facet CHENG, LUYANG
JING, SHENHONG
ZHANG, YINA
author_sort CHENG, LUYANG
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of 64-multislice spiral computed tomography (64-MSCT) for coronary stenosis compared with selective X-ray coronary angiography (SCA). Patients with chest pain, chest tightness or coronary stenosis received SCA and they acted as the controls. The sensitivity and accuracy of 64-MSCT were analyzed as compared with SCA. Images from 64-MSCT were obtained for 95 patients. For the diagnosis of myocardial bridge, 64-MSCT coronary CT angiography (CTA) is superior to SCA. In cases of mild coronary stenosis, combined with clinical symptoms, patients may choose to receive conservative treatment instead of SCA. However, cases of moderate coronary stenosis should receive SCA to determine the diagnosis. In conclusion, no difference was observed between 64-MSCT coronary CTA and SCA in their ability to exclude true negative diagnoses and diagnosing true positives of coronary disease. The 64-MSCT coronary CTA method produces improved image quality for diagnosis of coronary stenosis and is a non-invasive, reliable and effective method for the diagnosis of the severity of coronary stenosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3570241
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35702412013-02-13 A comparison study between CT angiography with 64-multislice spiral computed tomography and selective X-ray coronary angiography CHENG, LUYANG JING, SHENHONG ZHANG, YINA Exp Ther Med Articles The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of 64-multislice spiral computed tomography (64-MSCT) for coronary stenosis compared with selective X-ray coronary angiography (SCA). Patients with chest pain, chest tightness or coronary stenosis received SCA and they acted as the controls. The sensitivity and accuracy of 64-MSCT were analyzed as compared with SCA. Images from 64-MSCT were obtained for 95 patients. For the diagnosis of myocardial bridge, 64-MSCT coronary CT angiography (CTA) is superior to SCA. In cases of mild coronary stenosis, combined with clinical symptoms, patients may choose to receive conservative treatment instead of SCA. However, cases of moderate coronary stenosis should receive SCA to determine the diagnosis. In conclusion, no difference was observed between 64-MSCT coronary CTA and SCA in their ability to exclude true negative diagnoses and diagnosing true positives of coronary disease. The 64-MSCT coronary CTA method produces improved image quality for diagnosis of coronary stenosis and is a non-invasive, reliable and effective method for the diagnosis of the severity of coronary stenosis. D.A. Spandidos 2013-03 2013-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3570241/ /pubmed/23408650 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.905 Text en Copyright © 2013, Spandidos Publications http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an open-access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. The article may be redistributed, reproduced, and reused for non-commercial purposes, provided the original source is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
CHENG, LUYANG
JING, SHENHONG
ZHANG, YINA
A comparison study between CT angiography with 64-multislice spiral computed tomography and selective X-ray coronary angiography
title A comparison study between CT angiography with 64-multislice spiral computed tomography and selective X-ray coronary angiography
title_full A comparison study between CT angiography with 64-multislice spiral computed tomography and selective X-ray coronary angiography
title_fullStr A comparison study between CT angiography with 64-multislice spiral computed tomography and selective X-ray coronary angiography
title_full_unstemmed A comparison study between CT angiography with 64-multislice spiral computed tomography and selective X-ray coronary angiography
title_short A comparison study between CT angiography with 64-multislice spiral computed tomography and selective X-ray coronary angiography
title_sort comparison study between ct angiography with 64-multislice spiral computed tomography and selective x-ray coronary angiography
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3570241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23408650
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.905
work_keys_str_mv AT chengluyang acomparisonstudybetweenctangiographywith64multislicespiralcomputedtomographyandselectivexraycoronaryangiography
AT jingshenhong acomparisonstudybetweenctangiographywith64multislicespiralcomputedtomographyandselectivexraycoronaryangiography
AT zhangyina acomparisonstudybetweenctangiographywith64multislicespiralcomputedtomographyandselectivexraycoronaryangiography
AT chengluyang comparisonstudybetweenctangiographywith64multislicespiralcomputedtomographyandselectivexraycoronaryangiography
AT jingshenhong comparisonstudybetweenctangiographywith64multislicespiralcomputedtomographyandselectivexraycoronaryangiography
AT zhangyina comparisonstudybetweenctangiographywith64multislicespiralcomputedtomographyandselectivexraycoronaryangiography