Cargando…

Defining the mid-diastolic imaging period for cardiac CT – lessons from tissue Doppler echocardiography

BACKGROUND: Aggressive dose reduction strategies for cardiac CT require the prospective selection of limited cardiac phases. At lower heart rates, the period of mid-diastole is typically selected for image acquisition. We aimed to identify the effect of heart rate on the optimal CT acquisition phase...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Otton, James M, Phan, Justin, Feneley, Michael, Yu, Chung-yao, Sammel, Neville, McCrohon, Jane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3570333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23375107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2342-13-5
_version_ 1782259049728835584
author Otton, James M
Phan, Justin
Feneley, Michael
Yu, Chung-yao
Sammel, Neville
McCrohon, Jane
author_facet Otton, James M
Phan, Justin
Feneley, Michael
Yu, Chung-yao
Sammel, Neville
McCrohon, Jane
author_sort Otton, James M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Aggressive dose reduction strategies for cardiac CT require the prospective selection of limited cardiac phases. At lower heart rates, the period of mid-diastole is typically selected for image acquisition. We aimed to identify the effect of heart rate on the optimal CT acquisition phase within the period of mid-diastole. METHODS: We utilized high temporal resolution tissue Doppler to precisely measure coronary motion within diastole. Tissue-Doppler waveforms of the myocardium corresponding to the location of the circumflex artery (100 patients) and mid-right coronary arteries (50 patients) and the duration and timing of coronary motion were measured. Using regression analysis an equation was derived for the timing of the period of minimal coronary motion within the RR interval. In a validation set of 50 clinical cardiac CT examinations, we assessed coronary motion artifact and the effect of using a mid-diastolic imaging target that was adjusted according to heart rate vs a fixed 75% phase target. RESULTS: Tissue Doppler analysis shows the period of minimal cardiac motion suitable for CT imaging decreases almost linearly as the RR interval decreases, becoming extinguished at an average heart rate of 91 bpm for the circumflex (LCX) and 78 bpm for the right coronary artery (RCA). The optimal imaging phase has a strong linear relationship with RR duration (R(2) = 0.92 LCX, 0.89 RCA). The optimal phase predicted by regression analysis of the tissue-Doppler waveforms increases from 74% at a heart rate of 55 bpm to 77% at 75 bpm. In the clinical CT validation set, the optimal CT acquisition phase similarly occurred later with increasing heart rate. When the selected cardiac phase was adjusted according to heart rate the result was closer to the optimal phase than using a fixed 75% phase. While this effect was statistically significant (p < 0.01 RCA/LCx), the mean effect of heart-rate adjustment was minor relative to typical beat-to-beat variability and available precision of clinical phase selection. CONCLUSION: High temporal resolution imaging of coronary motion can be used to predict the optimal acquisition phase in cardiac CT. The optimal phase for cardiac CT imaging within mid-diastole increases with increasing heart rate although the magnitude of change is small.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3570333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35703332013-02-13 Defining the mid-diastolic imaging period for cardiac CT – lessons from tissue Doppler echocardiography Otton, James M Phan, Justin Feneley, Michael Yu, Chung-yao Sammel, Neville McCrohon, Jane BMC Med Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: Aggressive dose reduction strategies for cardiac CT require the prospective selection of limited cardiac phases. At lower heart rates, the period of mid-diastole is typically selected for image acquisition. We aimed to identify the effect of heart rate on the optimal CT acquisition phase within the period of mid-diastole. METHODS: We utilized high temporal resolution tissue Doppler to precisely measure coronary motion within diastole. Tissue-Doppler waveforms of the myocardium corresponding to the location of the circumflex artery (100 patients) and mid-right coronary arteries (50 patients) and the duration and timing of coronary motion were measured. Using regression analysis an equation was derived for the timing of the period of minimal coronary motion within the RR interval. In a validation set of 50 clinical cardiac CT examinations, we assessed coronary motion artifact and the effect of using a mid-diastolic imaging target that was adjusted according to heart rate vs a fixed 75% phase target. RESULTS: Tissue Doppler analysis shows the period of minimal cardiac motion suitable for CT imaging decreases almost linearly as the RR interval decreases, becoming extinguished at an average heart rate of 91 bpm for the circumflex (LCX) and 78 bpm for the right coronary artery (RCA). The optimal imaging phase has a strong linear relationship with RR duration (R(2) = 0.92 LCX, 0.89 RCA). The optimal phase predicted by regression analysis of the tissue-Doppler waveforms increases from 74% at a heart rate of 55 bpm to 77% at 75 bpm. In the clinical CT validation set, the optimal CT acquisition phase similarly occurred later with increasing heart rate. When the selected cardiac phase was adjusted according to heart rate the result was closer to the optimal phase than using a fixed 75% phase. While this effect was statistically significant (p < 0.01 RCA/LCx), the mean effect of heart-rate adjustment was minor relative to typical beat-to-beat variability and available precision of clinical phase selection. CONCLUSION: High temporal resolution imaging of coronary motion can be used to predict the optimal acquisition phase in cardiac CT. The optimal phase for cardiac CT imaging within mid-diastole increases with increasing heart rate although the magnitude of change is small. BioMed Central 2013-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3570333/ /pubmed/23375107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2342-13-5 Text en Copyright ©2013 Otton et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Otton, James M
Phan, Justin
Feneley, Michael
Yu, Chung-yao
Sammel, Neville
McCrohon, Jane
Defining the mid-diastolic imaging period for cardiac CT – lessons from tissue Doppler echocardiography
title Defining the mid-diastolic imaging period for cardiac CT – lessons from tissue Doppler echocardiography
title_full Defining the mid-diastolic imaging period for cardiac CT – lessons from tissue Doppler echocardiography
title_fullStr Defining the mid-diastolic imaging period for cardiac CT – lessons from tissue Doppler echocardiography
title_full_unstemmed Defining the mid-diastolic imaging period for cardiac CT – lessons from tissue Doppler echocardiography
title_short Defining the mid-diastolic imaging period for cardiac CT – lessons from tissue Doppler echocardiography
title_sort defining the mid-diastolic imaging period for cardiac ct – lessons from tissue doppler echocardiography
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3570333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23375107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2342-13-5
work_keys_str_mv AT ottonjamesm definingthemiddiastolicimagingperiodforcardiacctlessonsfromtissuedopplerechocardiography
AT phanjustin definingthemiddiastolicimagingperiodforcardiacctlessonsfromtissuedopplerechocardiography
AT feneleymichael definingthemiddiastolicimagingperiodforcardiacctlessonsfromtissuedopplerechocardiography
AT yuchungyao definingthemiddiastolicimagingperiodforcardiacctlessonsfromtissuedopplerechocardiography
AT sammelneville definingthemiddiastolicimagingperiodforcardiacctlessonsfromtissuedopplerechocardiography
AT mccrohonjane definingthemiddiastolicimagingperiodforcardiacctlessonsfromtissuedopplerechocardiography