Cargando…

High risk prescribing in older adults: prevalence, clinical and economic implications and potential for intervention at the population level

BACKGROUND: High risk prescribing can compromise independent wellbeing and quality of life in older adults. The aims of this project are to determine the prevalence, risk factors, clinical consequences, and costs of high risk prescribing, and to assess the impact of interventions on high risk prescr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gnjidic, Danijela, Le Couteur, David G, Pearson, Sallie-Anne, McLachlan, Andrew J, Viney, Rosalie, Hilmer, Sarah N, Blyth, Fiona M, Joshy, Grace, Banks, Emily
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3570486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23388494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-115
_version_ 1782259086496104448
author Gnjidic, Danijela
Le Couteur, David G
Pearson, Sallie-Anne
McLachlan, Andrew J
Viney, Rosalie
Hilmer, Sarah N
Blyth, Fiona M
Joshy, Grace
Banks, Emily
author_facet Gnjidic, Danijela
Le Couteur, David G
Pearson, Sallie-Anne
McLachlan, Andrew J
Viney, Rosalie
Hilmer, Sarah N
Blyth, Fiona M
Joshy, Grace
Banks, Emily
author_sort Gnjidic, Danijela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: High risk prescribing can compromise independent wellbeing and quality of life in older adults. The aims of this project are to determine the prevalence, risk factors, clinical consequences, and costs of high risk prescribing, and to assess the impact of interventions on high risk prescribing in older people. METHODS: The proposed project will utilise data from the 45 and Up Study, a large scale cohort of 267,153 men and women aged 45 and over recruited during 2006–2009 from the state of New South Wales, Australia linked to a range of administrative health datasets. High risk prescribing will be assessed using three indicators: polypharmacy (use of five or more medicines); Beers Criteria (an explicit measure of potentially inappropriate medication use); and Drug Burden Index (a pharmacologic dose-dependent measure of cumulative exposure to anticholinergic and sedative medicines). Individual risk factors from the 45 and Up Study questionnaire, and health system characteristics from health datasets that are associated with the likelihood of high risk prescribing will be identified. The main outcome measures will include hospitalisation (first admission to hospital, total days in hospital, cause-specific hospitalisation); admission to institutionalised care; all-cause mortality, and, where possible, cause-specific mortality. Economic costs to the health care system and implications of high risk prescribing will be also investigated. In addition, changes in high risk prescribing will be evaluated in relation to certain routine medicines-related interventions. The statistical analysis will be conducted using standard pharmaco-epidemiological methods including descriptive analysis, univariate and multivariate regression analysis, controlling for relevant confounding factors, using a number of different approaches. DISCUSSION: The availability of large-scale data is useful to identify opportunities for improving prescribing, and health in older adults. The size of the 45 and Up Study, along with linkage to health databases provides an important opportunity to investigate the relationship between high risk prescribing and adverse outcomes in a real-world population of older adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3570486
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35704862013-02-14 High risk prescribing in older adults: prevalence, clinical and economic implications and potential for intervention at the population level Gnjidic, Danijela Le Couteur, David G Pearson, Sallie-Anne McLachlan, Andrew J Viney, Rosalie Hilmer, Sarah N Blyth, Fiona M Joshy, Grace Banks, Emily BMC Public Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: High risk prescribing can compromise independent wellbeing and quality of life in older adults. The aims of this project are to determine the prevalence, risk factors, clinical consequences, and costs of high risk prescribing, and to assess the impact of interventions on high risk prescribing in older people. METHODS: The proposed project will utilise data from the 45 and Up Study, a large scale cohort of 267,153 men and women aged 45 and over recruited during 2006–2009 from the state of New South Wales, Australia linked to a range of administrative health datasets. High risk prescribing will be assessed using three indicators: polypharmacy (use of five or more medicines); Beers Criteria (an explicit measure of potentially inappropriate medication use); and Drug Burden Index (a pharmacologic dose-dependent measure of cumulative exposure to anticholinergic and sedative medicines). Individual risk factors from the 45 and Up Study questionnaire, and health system characteristics from health datasets that are associated with the likelihood of high risk prescribing will be identified. The main outcome measures will include hospitalisation (first admission to hospital, total days in hospital, cause-specific hospitalisation); admission to institutionalised care; all-cause mortality, and, where possible, cause-specific mortality. Economic costs to the health care system and implications of high risk prescribing will be also investigated. In addition, changes in high risk prescribing will be evaluated in relation to certain routine medicines-related interventions. The statistical analysis will be conducted using standard pharmaco-epidemiological methods including descriptive analysis, univariate and multivariate regression analysis, controlling for relevant confounding factors, using a number of different approaches. DISCUSSION: The availability of large-scale data is useful to identify opportunities for improving prescribing, and health in older adults. The size of the 45 and Up Study, along with linkage to health databases provides an important opportunity to investigate the relationship between high risk prescribing and adverse outcomes in a real-world population of older adults. BioMed Central 2013-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3570486/ /pubmed/23388494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-115 Text en Copyright © 2013 Gnjidic et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Gnjidic, Danijela
Le Couteur, David G
Pearson, Sallie-Anne
McLachlan, Andrew J
Viney, Rosalie
Hilmer, Sarah N
Blyth, Fiona M
Joshy, Grace
Banks, Emily
High risk prescribing in older adults: prevalence, clinical and economic implications and potential for intervention at the population level
title High risk prescribing in older adults: prevalence, clinical and economic implications and potential for intervention at the population level
title_full High risk prescribing in older adults: prevalence, clinical and economic implications and potential for intervention at the population level
title_fullStr High risk prescribing in older adults: prevalence, clinical and economic implications and potential for intervention at the population level
title_full_unstemmed High risk prescribing in older adults: prevalence, clinical and economic implications and potential for intervention at the population level
title_short High risk prescribing in older adults: prevalence, clinical and economic implications and potential for intervention at the population level
title_sort high risk prescribing in older adults: prevalence, clinical and economic implications and potential for intervention at the population level
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3570486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23388494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-115
work_keys_str_mv AT gnjidicdanijela highriskprescribinginolderadultsprevalenceclinicalandeconomicimplicationsandpotentialforinterventionatthepopulationlevel
AT lecouteurdavidg highriskprescribinginolderadultsprevalenceclinicalandeconomicimplicationsandpotentialforinterventionatthepopulationlevel
AT pearsonsallieanne highriskprescribinginolderadultsprevalenceclinicalandeconomicimplicationsandpotentialforinterventionatthepopulationlevel
AT mclachlanandrewj highriskprescribinginolderadultsprevalenceclinicalandeconomicimplicationsandpotentialforinterventionatthepopulationlevel
AT vineyrosalie highriskprescribinginolderadultsprevalenceclinicalandeconomicimplicationsandpotentialforinterventionatthepopulationlevel
AT hilmersarahn highriskprescribinginolderadultsprevalenceclinicalandeconomicimplicationsandpotentialforinterventionatthepopulationlevel
AT blythfionam highriskprescribinginolderadultsprevalenceclinicalandeconomicimplicationsandpotentialforinterventionatthepopulationlevel
AT joshygrace highriskprescribinginolderadultsprevalenceclinicalandeconomicimplicationsandpotentialforinterventionatthepopulationlevel
AT banksemily highriskprescribinginolderadultsprevalenceclinicalandeconomicimplicationsandpotentialforinterventionatthepopulationlevel