Cargando…

The Effect of Different Irrigation Protocols for Smear Layer Removal on Bond Strength of a New Bioceramic Sealer

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of different irrigation protocols for smear layer removal on the bond strength of EndoSequence BC Sealer, a new bioceramic sealer, to root canal dentin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The middle third of forty-four extracted human teeth were s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shokouhinejad, Noushin, Hoseini, Atefeh, Gorjestani, Hedayat, Shamshiri, Ahmad Reza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3570970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23411764
_version_ 1782259131596406784
author Shokouhinejad, Noushin
Hoseini, Atefeh
Gorjestani, Hedayat
Shamshiri, Ahmad Reza
author_facet Shokouhinejad, Noushin
Hoseini, Atefeh
Gorjestani, Hedayat
Shamshiri, Ahmad Reza
author_sort Shokouhinejad, Noushin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of different irrigation protocols for smear layer removal on the bond strength of EndoSequence BC Sealer, a new bioceramic sealer, to root canal dentin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The middle third of forty-four extracted human teeth were sectioned horizontally to obtain 128 dentin disks. After standardization of canal spaces, dentin disks were immersed in 5.25% NaOCl for 20 min. The specimens were then randomly assigned to four groups (n=32) according to dentin treatment procedure: group 1, 17% EDTA (1 min); group 2, 17% EDTA (1 min) + 5.25% NaOCl (5 min); group 3, 17% EDTA (1 min) + 2% chlorhexidine (CHX) (5 min); and group 4, 17% EDTA (1 min) + saline (5 min). After dentin treatment, two specimens of each group were prepared for investigation with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Surface of root canal wall was assessed in each specimen. Then the canal spaces were filled with EndoSequence BC Sealer in the remaining specimens. Push-out bond-strength and failure modes were assessed. The data on push-out test were analyzed using one-way ANOVA test. The significance level was set at P=0.05. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the bond strengths of test groups (P=0.203). The bond failure was mainly cohesive for all groups. CONCLUSION: Under the conditions of this ex vivo study, it could be concluded that the application of 17% EDTA alone or followed by 5.25% NaOCl, 2% CHX, or saline resulted in similar bond strength of EndoSequence BC Sealer to dentinal walls.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3570970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Iranian Center for Endodontic Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35709702013-02-14 The Effect of Different Irrigation Protocols for Smear Layer Removal on Bond Strength of a New Bioceramic Sealer Shokouhinejad, Noushin Hoseini, Atefeh Gorjestani, Hedayat Shamshiri, Ahmad Reza Iran Endod J Original Article INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of different irrigation protocols for smear layer removal on the bond strength of EndoSequence BC Sealer, a new bioceramic sealer, to root canal dentin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The middle third of forty-four extracted human teeth were sectioned horizontally to obtain 128 dentin disks. After standardization of canal spaces, dentin disks were immersed in 5.25% NaOCl for 20 min. The specimens were then randomly assigned to four groups (n=32) according to dentin treatment procedure: group 1, 17% EDTA (1 min); group 2, 17% EDTA (1 min) + 5.25% NaOCl (5 min); group 3, 17% EDTA (1 min) + 2% chlorhexidine (CHX) (5 min); and group 4, 17% EDTA (1 min) + saline (5 min). After dentin treatment, two specimens of each group were prepared for investigation with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Surface of root canal wall was assessed in each specimen. Then the canal spaces were filled with EndoSequence BC Sealer in the remaining specimens. Push-out bond-strength and failure modes were assessed. The data on push-out test were analyzed using one-way ANOVA test. The significance level was set at P=0.05. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the bond strengths of test groups (P=0.203). The bond failure was mainly cohesive for all groups. CONCLUSION: Under the conditions of this ex vivo study, it could be concluded that the application of 17% EDTA alone or followed by 5.25% NaOCl, 2% CHX, or saline resulted in similar bond strength of EndoSequence BC Sealer to dentinal walls. Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2013-01-20 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3570970/ /pubmed/23411764 Text en Copyright © 2013, Iranian Endodontic Journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shokouhinejad, Noushin
Hoseini, Atefeh
Gorjestani, Hedayat
Shamshiri, Ahmad Reza
The Effect of Different Irrigation Protocols for Smear Layer Removal on Bond Strength of a New Bioceramic Sealer
title The Effect of Different Irrigation Protocols for Smear Layer Removal on Bond Strength of a New Bioceramic Sealer
title_full The Effect of Different Irrigation Protocols for Smear Layer Removal on Bond Strength of a New Bioceramic Sealer
title_fullStr The Effect of Different Irrigation Protocols for Smear Layer Removal on Bond Strength of a New Bioceramic Sealer
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Different Irrigation Protocols for Smear Layer Removal on Bond Strength of a New Bioceramic Sealer
title_short The Effect of Different Irrigation Protocols for Smear Layer Removal on Bond Strength of a New Bioceramic Sealer
title_sort effect of different irrigation protocols for smear layer removal on bond strength of a new bioceramic sealer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3570970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23411764
work_keys_str_mv AT shokouhinejadnoushin theeffectofdifferentirrigationprotocolsforsmearlayerremovalonbondstrengthofanewbioceramicsealer
AT hoseiniatefeh theeffectofdifferentirrigationprotocolsforsmearlayerremovalonbondstrengthofanewbioceramicsealer
AT gorjestanihedayat theeffectofdifferentirrigationprotocolsforsmearlayerremovalonbondstrengthofanewbioceramicsealer
AT shamshiriahmadreza theeffectofdifferentirrigationprotocolsforsmearlayerremovalonbondstrengthofanewbioceramicsealer
AT shokouhinejadnoushin effectofdifferentirrigationprotocolsforsmearlayerremovalonbondstrengthofanewbioceramicsealer
AT hoseiniatefeh effectofdifferentirrigationprotocolsforsmearlayerremovalonbondstrengthofanewbioceramicsealer
AT gorjestanihedayat effectofdifferentirrigationprotocolsforsmearlayerremovalonbondstrengthofanewbioceramicsealer
AT shamshiriahmadreza effectofdifferentirrigationprotocolsforsmearlayerremovalonbondstrengthofanewbioceramicsealer