Cargando…
A Comparison of Error Bounds for a Nonlinear Tracking System with Detection Probability P(d) < 1
Error bounds for nonlinear filtering are very important for performance evaluation and sensor management. This paper presents a comparative study of three error bounds for tracking filtering, when the detection probability is less than unity. One of these bounds is the random finite set (RFS) bound,...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3571844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23242274 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s121217390 |
_version_ | 1782259217953980416 |
---|---|
author | Tong, Huisi Zhang, Hao Meng, Huadong Wang, Xiqin |
author_facet | Tong, Huisi Zhang, Hao Meng, Huadong Wang, Xiqin |
author_sort | Tong, Huisi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Error bounds for nonlinear filtering are very important for performance evaluation and sensor management. This paper presents a comparative study of three error bounds for tracking filtering, when the detection probability is less than unity. One of these bounds is the random finite set (RFS) bound, which is deduced within the framework of finite set statistics. The others, which are the information reduction factor (IRF) posterior Cramer-Rao lower bound (PCRLB) and enumeration method (ENUM) PCRLB are introduced within the framework of finite vector statistics. In this paper, we deduce two propositions and prove that the RFS bound is equal to the ENUM PCRLB, while it is tighter than the IRF PCRLB, when the target exists from the beginning to the end. Considering the disappearance of existing targets and the appearance of new targets, the RFS bound is tighter than both IRF PCRLB and ENUM PCRLB with time, by introducing the uncertainty of target existence. The theory is illustrated by two nonlinear tracking applications: ballistic object tracking and bearings-only tracking. The simulation studies confirm the theory and reveal the relationship among the three bounds. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3571844 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35718442013-02-19 A Comparison of Error Bounds for a Nonlinear Tracking System with Detection Probability P(d) < 1 Tong, Huisi Zhang, Hao Meng, Huadong Wang, Xiqin Sensors (Basel) Article Error bounds for nonlinear filtering are very important for performance evaluation and sensor management. This paper presents a comparative study of three error bounds for tracking filtering, when the detection probability is less than unity. One of these bounds is the random finite set (RFS) bound, which is deduced within the framework of finite set statistics. The others, which are the information reduction factor (IRF) posterior Cramer-Rao lower bound (PCRLB) and enumeration method (ENUM) PCRLB are introduced within the framework of finite vector statistics. In this paper, we deduce two propositions and prove that the RFS bound is equal to the ENUM PCRLB, while it is tighter than the IRF PCRLB, when the target exists from the beginning to the end. Considering the disappearance of existing targets and the appearance of new targets, the RFS bound is tighter than both IRF PCRLB and ENUM PCRLB with time, by introducing the uncertainty of target existence. The theory is illustrated by two nonlinear tracking applications: ballistic object tracking and bearings-only tracking. The simulation studies confirm the theory and reveal the relationship among the three bounds. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2012-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3571844/ /pubmed/23242274 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s121217390 Text en © 2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Tong, Huisi Zhang, Hao Meng, Huadong Wang, Xiqin A Comparison of Error Bounds for a Nonlinear Tracking System with Detection Probability P(d) < 1 |
title | A Comparison of Error Bounds for a Nonlinear Tracking System with Detection Probability P(d) < 1 |
title_full | A Comparison of Error Bounds for a Nonlinear Tracking System with Detection Probability P(d) < 1 |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Error Bounds for a Nonlinear Tracking System with Detection Probability P(d) < 1 |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Error Bounds for a Nonlinear Tracking System with Detection Probability P(d) < 1 |
title_short | A Comparison of Error Bounds for a Nonlinear Tracking System with Detection Probability P(d) < 1 |
title_sort | comparison of error bounds for a nonlinear tracking system with detection probability p(d) < 1 |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3571844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23242274 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s121217390 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tonghuisi acomparisonoferrorboundsforanonlineartrackingsystemwithdetectionprobabilitypd1 AT zhanghao acomparisonoferrorboundsforanonlineartrackingsystemwithdetectionprobabilitypd1 AT menghuadong acomparisonoferrorboundsforanonlineartrackingsystemwithdetectionprobabilitypd1 AT wangxiqin acomparisonoferrorboundsforanonlineartrackingsystemwithdetectionprobabilitypd1 AT tonghuisi comparisonoferrorboundsforanonlineartrackingsystemwithdetectionprobabilitypd1 AT zhanghao comparisonoferrorboundsforanonlineartrackingsystemwithdetectionprobabilitypd1 AT menghuadong comparisonoferrorboundsforanonlineartrackingsystemwithdetectionprobabilitypd1 AT wangxiqin comparisonoferrorboundsforanonlineartrackingsystemwithdetectionprobabilitypd1 |