Cargando…

CBT for depression: a pilot RCT comparing mobile phone vs. computer

BACKGROUND: This paper reports the results of a pilot randomized controlled trial comparing the delivery modality (mobile phone/tablet or fixed computer) of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for the treatment of depression. The aim was to establish whether a previously validated computeri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watts, Sarah, Mackenzie, Anna, Thomas, Cherian, Griskaitis, Al, Mewton, Louise, Williams, Alishia, Andrews, Gavin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3571935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23391304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-49
_version_ 1782259238600441856
author Watts, Sarah
Mackenzie, Anna
Thomas, Cherian
Griskaitis, Al
Mewton, Louise
Williams, Alishia
Andrews, Gavin
author_facet Watts, Sarah
Mackenzie, Anna
Thomas, Cherian
Griskaitis, Al
Mewton, Louise
Williams, Alishia
Andrews, Gavin
author_sort Watts, Sarah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This paper reports the results of a pilot randomized controlled trial comparing the delivery modality (mobile phone/tablet or fixed computer) of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for the treatment of depression. The aim was to establish whether a previously validated computerized program (The Sadness Program) remained efficacious when delivered via a mobile application. METHOD: 35 participants were recruited with Major Depression (80% female) and randomly allocated to access the program using a mobile app (on either a mobile phone or iPad) or a computer. Participants completed 6 lessons, weekly homework assignments, and received weekly email contact from a clinical psychologist or psychiatrist until completion of lesson 2. After lesson 2 email contact was only provided in response to participant request, or in response to a deterioration in psychological distress scores. The primary outcome measure was the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9). Of the 35 participants recruited, 68.6% completed 6 lessons and 65.7% completed the 3-months follow up. Attrition was handled using mixed-model repeated-measures ANOVA. RESULTS: Both the Mobile and Computer Groups were associated with statistically significantly benefits in the PHQ-9 at post-test. At 3 months follow up, the reduction seen for both groups remained significant. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide evidence to indicate that delivering a CBT program using a mobile application, can result in clinically significant improvements in outcomes for patients with depression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN 12611001257954
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3571935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35719352013-02-14 CBT for depression: a pilot RCT comparing mobile phone vs. computer Watts, Sarah Mackenzie, Anna Thomas, Cherian Griskaitis, Al Mewton, Louise Williams, Alishia Andrews, Gavin BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: This paper reports the results of a pilot randomized controlled trial comparing the delivery modality (mobile phone/tablet or fixed computer) of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for the treatment of depression. The aim was to establish whether a previously validated computerized program (The Sadness Program) remained efficacious when delivered via a mobile application. METHOD: 35 participants were recruited with Major Depression (80% female) and randomly allocated to access the program using a mobile app (on either a mobile phone or iPad) or a computer. Participants completed 6 lessons, weekly homework assignments, and received weekly email contact from a clinical psychologist or psychiatrist until completion of lesson 2. After lesson 2 email contact was only provided in response to participant request, or in response to a deterioration in psychological distress scores. The primary outcome measure was the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9). Of the 35 participants recruited, 68.6% completed 6 lessons and 65.7% completed the 3-months follow up. Attrition was handled using mixed-model repeated-measures ANOVA. RESULTS: Both the Mobile and Computer Groups were associated with statistically significantly benefits in the PHQ-9 at post-test. At 3 months follow up, the reduction seen for both groups remained significant. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide evidence to indicate that delivering a CBT program using a mobile application, can result in clinically significant improvements in outcomes for patients with depression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN 12611001257954 BioMed Central 2013-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3571935/ /pubmed/23391304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-49 Text en Copyright ©2013 Watts et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Watts, Sarah
Mackenzie, Anna
Thomas, Cherian
Griskaitis, Al
Mewton, Louise
Williams, Alishia
Andrews, Gavin
CBT for depression: a pilot RCT comparing mobile phone vs. computer
title CBT for depression: a pilot RCT comparing mobile phone vs. computer
title_full CBT for depression: a pilot RCT comparing mobile phone vs. computer
title_fullStr CBT for depression: a pilot RCT comparing mobile phone vs. computer
title_full_unstemmed CBT for depression: a pilot RCT comparing mobile phone vs. computer
title_short CBT for depression: a pilot RCT comparing mobile phone vs. computer
title_sort cbt for depression: a pilot rct comparing mobile phone vs. computer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3571935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23391304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-49
work_keys_str_mv AT wattssarah cbtfordepressionapilotrctcomparingmobilephonevscomputer
AT mackenzieanna cbtfordepressionapilotrctcomparingmobilephonevscomputer
AT thomascherian cbtfordepressionapilotrctcomparingmobilephonevscomputer
AT griskaitisal cbtfordepressionapilotrctcomparingmobilephonevscomputer
AT mewtonlouise cbtfordepressionapilotrctcomparingmobilephonevscomputer
AT williamsalishia cbtfordepressionapilotrctcomparingmobilephonevscomputer
AT andrewsgavin cbtfordepressionapilotrctcomparingmobilephonevscomputer