Cargando…
CBT for depression: a pilot RCT comparing mobile phone vs. computer
BACKGROUND: This paper reports the results of a pilot randomized controlled trial comparing the delivery modality (mobile phone/tablet or fixed computer) of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for the treatment of depression. The aim was to establish whether a previously validated computeri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3571935/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23391304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-49 |
_version_ | 1782259238600441856 |
---|---|
author | Watts, Sarah Mackenzie, Anna Thomas, Cherian Griskaitis, Al Mewton, Louise Williams, Alishia Andrews, Gavin |
author_facet | Watts, Sarah Mackenzie, Anna Thomas, Cherian Griskaitis, Al Mewton, Louise Williams, Alishia Andrews, Gavin |
author_sort | Watts, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This paper reports the results of a pilot randomized controlled trial comparing the delivery modality (mobile phone/tablet or fixed computer) of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for the treatment of depression. The aim was to establish whether a previously validated computerized program (The Sadness Program) remained efficacious when delivered via a mobile application. METHOD: 35 participants were recruited with Major Depression (80% female) and randomly allocated to access the program using a mobile app (on either a mobile phone or iPad) or a computer. Participants completed 6 lessons, weekly homework assignments, and received weekly email contact from a clinical psychologist or psychiatrist until completion of lesson 2. After lesson 2 email contact was only provided in response to participant request, or in response to a deterioration in psychological distress scores. The primary outcome measure was the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9). Of the 35 participants recruited, 68.6% completed 6 lessons and 65.7% completed the 3-months follow up. Attrition was handled using mixed-model repeated-measures ANOVA. RESULTS: Both the Mobile and Computer Groups were associated with statistically significantly benefits in the PHQ-9 at post-test. At 3 months follow up, the reduction seen for both groups remained significant. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide evidence to indicate that delivering a CBT program using a mobile application, can result in clinically significant improvements in outcomes for patients with depression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN 12611001257954 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3571935 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35719352013-02-14 CBT for depression: a pilot RCT comparing mobile phone vs. computer Watts, Sarah Mackenzie, Anna Thomas, Cherian Griskaitis, Al Mewton, Louise Williams, Alishia Andrews, Gavin BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: This paper reports the results of a pilot randomized controlled trial comparing the delivery modality (mobile phone/tablet or fixed computer) of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for the treatment of depression. The aim was to establish whether a previously validated computerized program (The Sadness Program) remained efficacious when delivered via a mobile application. METHOD: 35 participants were recruited with Major Depression (80% female) and randomly allocated to access the program using a mobile app (on either a mobile phone or iPad) or a computer. Participants completed 6 lessons, weekly homework assignments, and received weekly email contact from a clinical psychologist or psychiatrist until completion of lesson 2. After lesson 2 email contact was only provided in response to participant request, or in response to a deterioration in psychological distress scores. The primary outcome measure was the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9). Of the 35 participants recruited, 68.6% completed 6 lessons and 65.7% completed the 3-months follow up. Attrition was handled using mixed-model repeated-measures ANOVA. RESULTS: Both the Mobile and Computer Groups were associated with statistically significantly benefits in the PHQ-9 at post-test. At 3 months follow up, the reduction seen for both groups remained significant. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide evidence to indicate that delivering a CBT program using a mobile application, can result in clinically significant improvements in outcomes for patients with depression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN 12611001257954 BioMed Central 2013-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3571935/ /pubmed/23391304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-49 Text en Copyright ©2013 Watts et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Watts, Sarah Mackenzie, Anna Thomas, Cherian Griskaitis, Al Mewton, Louise Williams, Alishia Andrews, Gavin CBT for depression: a pilot RCT comparing mobile phone vs. computer |
title | CBT for depression: a pilot RCT comparing mobile phone vs. computer |
title_full | CBT for depression: a pilot RCT comparing mobile phone vs. computer |
title_fullStr | CBT for depression: a pilot RCT comparing mobile phone vs. computer |
title_full_unstemmed | CBT for depression: a pilot RCT comparing mobile phone vs. computer |
title_short | CBT for depression: a pilot RCT comparing mobile phone vs. computer |
title_sort | cbt for depression: a pilot rct comparing mobile phone vs. computer |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3571935/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23391304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-49 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wattssarah cbtfordepressionapilotrctcomparingmobilephonevscomputer AT mackenzieanna cbtfordepressionapilotrctcomparingmobilephonevscomputer AT thomascherian cbtfordepressionapilotrctcomparingmobilephonevscomputer AT griskaitisal cbtfordepressionapilotrctcomparingmobilephonevscomputer AT mewtonlouise cbtfordepressionapilotrctcomparingmobilephonevscomputer AT williamsalishia cbtfordepressionapilotrctcomparingmobilephonevscomputer AT andrewsgavin cbtfordepressionapilotrctcomparingmobilephonevscomputer |