Cargando…

There Is No Free Won’t: Antecedent Brain Activity Predicts Decisions to Inhibit

Inhibition of prepotent action is an important aspect of self-control, particularly in social contexts. Action inhibition and its neural bases have been extensively studied. However, the neural precursors of free decisions to inhibit have hardly been studied. We asked participants to freely choose t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Filevich, Elisa, Kühn, Simone, Haggard, Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3572111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23418420
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053053
_version_ 1782259278143291392
author Filevich, Elisa
Kühn, Simone
Haggard, Patrick
author_facet Filevich, Elisa
Kühn, Simone
Haggard, Patrick
author_sort Filevich, Elisa
collection PubMed
description Inhibition of prepotent action is an important aspect of self-control, particularly in social contexts. Action inhibition and its neural bases have been extensively studied. However, the neural precursors of free decisions to inhibit have hardly been studied. We asked participants to freely choose to either make a rapid key press in response to a visual cue, or to transiently inhibit action, and briefly delay responding. The task required a behavioural response on each trial, so trials involving inhibition could be distinguished from those without inhibition as those showing slower reaction times. We used this criterion to classify free-choice trials as either rapid or inhibited/delayed. For 13 participants, we measured the mean amplitude of the ERP activity at electrode Cz in three subsequent 50 ms time windows prior to the onset of the signal that either instructed to respond or inhibit, or gave participants a free choice. In two of these 50 ms time windows (−150 to −100, and −100 to −50 ms relative to action onset), the amplitude of prestimulus ERP differed between trials where participants ”freely” chose whether to inhibit or to respond rapidly. Larger prestimulus ERP amplitudes were associated with trials in which participants decided to act rapidly as compared to trials in which they decided to delay their responses. Last-moment decisions to inhibit or delay may depend on unconscious preparatory neural activity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3572111
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35721112013-02-15 There Is No Free Won’t: Antecedent Brain Activity Predicts Decisions to Inhibit Filevich, Elisa Kühn, Simone Haggard, Patrick PLoS One Research Article Inhibition of prepotent action is an important aspect of self-control, particularly in social contexts. Action inhibition and its neural bases have been extensively studied. However, the neural precursors of free decisions to inhibit have hardly been studied. We asked participants to freely choose to either make a rapid key press in response to a visual cue, or to transiently inhibit action, and briefly delay responding. The task required a behavioural response on each trial, so trials involving inhibition could be distinguished from those without inhibition as those showing slower reaction times. We used this criterion to classify free-choice trials as either rapid or inhibited/delayed. For 13 participants, we measured the mean amplitude of the ERP activity at electrode Cz in three subsequent 50 ms time windows prior to the onset of the signal that either instructed to respond or inhibit, or gave participants a free choice. In two of these 50 ms time windows (−150 to −100, and −100 to −50 ms relative to action onset), the amplitude of prestimulus ERP differed between trials where participants ”freely” chose whether to inhibit or to respond rapidly. Larger prestimulus ERP amplitudes were associated with trials in which participants decided to act rapidly as compared to trials in which they decided to delay their responses. Last-moment decisions to inhibit or delay may depend on unconscious preparatory neural activity. Public Library of Science 2013-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3572111/ /pubmed/23418420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053053 Text en © 2013 Filevich et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Filevich, Elisa
Kühn, Simone
Haggard, Patrick
There Is No Free Won’t: Antecedent Brain Activity Predicts Decisions to Inhibit
title There Is No Free Won’t: Antecedent Brain Activity Predicts Decisions to Inhibit
title_full There Is No Free Won’t: Antecedent Brain Activity Predicts Decisions to Inhibit
title_fullStr There Is No Free Won’t: Antecedent Brain Activity Predicts Decisions to Inhibit
title_full_unstemmed There Is No Free Won’t: Antecedent Brain Activity Predicts Decisions to Inhibit
title_short There Is No Free Won’t: Antecedent Brain Activity Predicts Decisions to Inhibit
title_sort there is no free won’t: antecedent brain activity predicts decisions to inhibit
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3572111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23418420
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053053
work_keys_str_mv AT filevichelisa thereisnofreewontantecedentbrainactivitypredictsdecisionstoinhibit
AT kuhnsimone thereisnofreewontantecedentbrainactivitypredictsdecisionstoinhibit
AT haggardpatrick thereisnofreewontantecedentbrainactivitypredictsdecisionstoinhibit