Cargando…

Proton Pump Inhibitor Use in the U.S. Ambulatory Setting, 2002–2009

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Anecdotal reports and studies of select populations suggest that the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has increased since their introduction. We sought to determine recent trends in PPI use in the U.S. outpatient setting and characteristics of patients and physicians that ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rotman, Stephen R., Bishop, Tara F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3572154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23418510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056060
_version_ 1782259288348033024
author Rotman, Stephen R.
Bishop, Tara F.
author_facet Rotman, Stephen R.
Bishop, Tara F.
author_sort Rotman, Stephen R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Anecdotal reports and studies of select populations suggest that the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has increased since their introduction. We sought to determine recent trends in PPI use in the U.S. outpatient setting and characteristics of patients and physicians that may predict their use. METHODS: We used data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) to estimate the prevalence of visits in which patients used PPIs from 2002 to 2009. We tested for associations between PPI use and patient, physician, and practice characteristics using data from 2009. We also estimated the prevalence of visits in which PPIs were used by patients without gastrointestinal complaints, diagnoses, or other indications for their use and tested for associations between patient and physician characteristics and PPI use in patients with no documented indication. RESULTS: PPIs were used in 4.0% of visits in 2002 and 9.2% in 2009 (p<0.001 for trend across years). The use of omeprazole (0.9% in 2002 to 3.9% in 2009, p<0.001), esomeprazole (0.9% in 2002 to 2.3% in 2009, p<0.001), and pantoprazole (0.6% in 2002 to 1.6% in 2009, p<0.001) increased significantly over the study period. Among visits by patients using PPIs, 62.9% documented no gastrointestinal complaints, gastrointestinal diagnoses, or other indicated reason for their use. CONCLUSIONS: We found that PPI use increased significantly from 2002 to 2009 as did documented indications for their use. Newly-prescribed PPI use did not change from 2006 to 2009. More research is needed to determine whether PPIs are overused in the U.S. outpatient setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3572154
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35721542013-02-15 Proton Pump Inhibitor Use in the U.S. Ambulatory Setting, 2002–2009 Rotman, Stephen R. Bishop, Tara F. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Anecdotal reports and studies of select populations suggest that the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has increased since their introduction. We sought to determine recent trends in PPI use in the U.S. outpatient setting and characteristics of patients and physicians that may predict their use. METHODS: We used data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) to estimate the prevalence of visits in which patients used PPIs from 2002 to 2009. We tested for associations between PPI use and patient, physician, and practice characteristics using data from 2009. We also estimated the prevalence of visits in which PPIs were used by patients without gastrointestinal complaints, diagnoses, or other indications for their use and tested for associations between patient and physician characteristics and PPI use in patients with no documented indication. RESULTS: PPIs were used in 4.0% of visits in 2002 and 9.2% in 2009 (p<0.001 for trend across years). The use of omeprazole (0.9% in 2002 to 3.9% in 2009, p<0.001), esomeprazole (0.9% in 2002 to 2.3% in 2009, p<0.001), and pantoprazole (0.6% in 2002 to 1.6% in 2009, p<0.001) increased significantly over the study period. Among visits by patients using PPIs, 62.9% documented no gastrointestinal complaints, gastrointestinal diagnoses, or other indicated reason for their use. CONCLUSIONS: We found that PPI use increased significantly from 2002 to 2009 as did documented indications for their use. Newly-prescribed PPI use did not change from 2006 to 2009. More research is needed to determine whether PPIs are overused in the U.S. outpatient setting. Public Library of Science 2013-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3572154/ /pubmed/23418510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056060 Text en © 2013 Rotman, Bishop http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rotman, Stephen R.
Bishop, Tara F.
Proton Pump Inhibitor Use in the U.S. Ambulatory Setting, 2002–2009
title Proton Pump Inhibitor Use in the U.S. Ambulatory Setting, 2002–2009
title_full Proton Pump Inhibitor Use in the U.S. Ambulatory Setting, 2002–2009
title_fullStr Proton Pump Inhibitor Use in the U.S. Ambulatory Setting, 2002–2009
title_full_unstemmed Proton Pump Inhibitor Use in the U.S. Ambulatory Setting, 2002–2009
title_short Proton Pump Inhibitor Use in the U.S. Ambulatory Setting, 2002–2009
title_sort proton pump inhibitor use in the u.s. ambulatory setting, 2002–2009
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3572154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23418510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056060
work_keys_str_mv AT rotmanstephenr protonpumpinhibitoruseintheusambulatorysetting20022009
AT bishoptaraf protonpumpinhibitoruseintheusambulatorysetting20022009