Cargando…

Risk Factors for Violence in Psychosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis of 110 Studies

BACKGROUND: Previous reviews on risk and protective factors for violence in psychosis have produced contrasting findings. There is therefore a need to clarify the direction and strength of association of risk and protective factors for violent outcomes in individuals with psychosis. METHOD: We condu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Witt, Katrina, van Dorn, Richard, Fazel, Seena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3572179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23418482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055942
_version_ 1782259294312333312
author Witt, Katrina
van Dorn, Richard
Fazel, Seena
author_facet Witt, Katrina
van Dorn, Richard
Fazel, Seena
author_sort Witt, Katrina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous reviews on risk and protective factors for violence in psychosis have produced contrasting findings. There is therefore a need to clarify the direction and strength of association of risk and protective factors for violent outcomes in individuals with psychosis. METHOD: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using 6 electronic databases (CINAHL, EBSCO, EMBASE, Global Health, PsycINFO, PUBMED) and Google Scholar. Studies were identified that reported factors associated with violence in adults diagnosed, using DSM or ICD criteria, with schizophrenia and other psychoses. We considered non-English language studies and dissertations. Risk and protective factors were meta-analysed if reported in three or more primary studies. Meta-regression examined sources of heterogeneity. A novel meta-epidemiological approach was used to group similar risk factors into one of 10 domains. Sub-group analyses were then used to investigate whether risk domains differed for studies reporting severe violence (rather than aggression or hostility) and studies based in inpatient (rather than outpatient) settings. FINDINGS: There were 110 eligible studies reporting on 45,533 individuals, 8,439 (18.5%) of whom were violent. A total of 39,995 (87.8%) were diagnosed with schizophrenia, 209 (0.4%) were diagnosed with bipolar disorder, and 5,329 (11.8%) were diagnosed with other psychoses. Dynamic (or modifiable) risk factors included hostile behaviour, recent drug misuse, non-adherence with psychological therapies (p values<0.001), higher poor impulse control scores, recent substance misuse, recent alcohol misuse (p values<0.01), and non-adherence with medication (p value <0.05). We also examined a number of static factors, the strongest of which were criminal history factors. When restricting outcomes to severe violence, these associations did not change materially. In studies investigating inpatient violence, associations differed in strength but not direction. CONCLUSION: Certain dynamic risk factors are strongly associated with increased violence risk in individuals with psychosis and their role in risk assessment and management warrants further examination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3572179
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35721792013-02-15 Risk Factors for Violence in Psychosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis of 110 Studies Witt, Katrina van Dorn, Richard Fazel, Seena PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Previous reviews on risk and protective factors for violence in psychosis have produced contrasting findings. There is therefore a need to clarify the direction and strength of association of risk and protective factors for violent outcomes in individuals with psychosis. METHOD: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using 6 electronic databases (CINAHL, EBSCO, EMBASE, Global Health, PsycINFO, PUBMED) and Google Scholar. Studies were identified that reported factors associated with violence in adults diagnosed, using DSM or ICD criteria, with schizophrenia and other psychoses. We considered non-English language studies and dissertations. Risk and protective factors were meta-analysed if reported in three or more primary studies. Meta-regression examined sources of heterogeneity. A novel meta-epidemiological approach was used to group similar risk factors into one of 10 domains. Sub-group analyses were then used to investigate whether risk domains differed for studies reporting severe violence (rather than aggression or hostility) and studies based in inpatient (rather than outpatient) settings. FINDINGS: There were 110 eligible studies reporting on 45,533 individuals, 8,439 (18.5%) of whom were violent. A total of 39,995 (87.8%) were diagnosed with schizophrenia, 209 (0.4%) were diagnosed with bipolar disorder, and 5,329 (11.8%) were diagnosed with other psychoses. Dynamic (or modifiable) risk factors included hostile behaviour, recent drug misuse, non-adherence with psychological therapies (p values<0.001), higher poor impulse control scores, recent substance misuse, recent alcohol misuse (p values<0.01), and non-adherence with medication (p value <0.05). We also examined a number of static factors, the strongest of which were criminal history factors. When restricting outcomes to severe violence, these associations did not change materially. In studies investigating inpatient violence, associations differed in strength but not direction. CONCLUSION: Certain dynamic risk factors are strongly associated with increased violence risk in individuals with psychosis and their role in risk assessment and management warrants further examination. Public Library of Science 2013-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3572179/ /pubmed/23418482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055942 Text en © 2013 Witt et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Witt, Katrina
van Dorn, Richard
Fazel, Seena
Risk Factors for Violence in Psychosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis of 110 Studies
title Risk Factors for Violence in Psychosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis of 110 Studies
title_full Risk Factors for Violence in Psychosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis of 110 Studies
title_fullStr Risk Factors for Violence in Psychosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis of 110 Studies
title_full_unstemmed Risk Factors for Violence in Psychosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis of 110 Studies
title_short Risk Factors for Violence in Psychosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis of 110 Studies
title_sort risk factors for violence in psychosis: systematic review and meta-regression analysis of 110 studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3572179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23418482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055942
work_keys_str_mv AT wittkatrina riskfactorsforviolenceinpsychosissystematicreviewandmetaregressionanalysisof110studies
AT vandornrichard riskfactorsforviolenceinpsychosissystematicreviewandmetaregressionanalysisof110studies
AT fazelseena riskfactorsforviolenceinpsychosissystematicreviewandmetaregressionanalysisof110studies