Cargando…
A cross-sectional study of maternal perception of fetal movements and antenatal advice in a general pregnant population, using a qualitative framework
BACKGROUND: Maternal perception of fetal movements has been used as a measure of fetal well-being. Yet a Cochrane review does not recommend formal fetal movement counting compared to discretional fetal movement counting. There is some evidence that suggests that the quality of fetal movements can pr...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3572429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23383737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-32 |
_version_ | 1782259323832893440 |
---|---|
author | Raynes-Greenow, Camille H Gordon, Adrienne Li, Qiushuang Hyett, Jon A |
author_facet | Raynes-Greenow, Camille H Gordon, Adrienne Li, Qiushuang Hyett, Jon A |
author_sort | Raynes-Greenow, Camille H |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Maternal perception of fetal movements has been used as a measure of fetal well-being. Yet a Cochrane review does not recommend formal fetal movement counting compared to discretional fetal movement counting. There is some evidence that suggests that the quality of fetal movements can precede quantitative changes however there has been almost no assessment of how women describe movements and whether these descriptions may be useful in a clinical setting. Therefore we aimed to examine maternal perception of fetal movements using a qualitative framework. METHODS: Using a cross-sectional design we identified women during routine antenatal care at a tertiary referral hospital, in Sydney, Australia. Eligible women were pregnant ≥ 28 weeks, carrying a single child, > 18 years old, and with sufficient English literacy to self-complete a questionnaire. Post-natally the medical records were reviewed and demographic, pregnancy and fetal outcome data were extracted. Text responses to questions regarding maternal descriptions of fetal movements throughout pregnancy, were analysed using thematic analysis in an explicit process. RESULTS: 156 women participated. There was a general pattern to fetal movement descriptions with increasing gestation, beginning with words such as “gentle”, to descriptions of “strong” and “limb” movements, and finally to “whole body” movements. Women perceived and described qualitative changes to fetal movements that changed throughout gestation. The majority (83%) reported that they were asked to assess fetal movements in an implicit qualitative method during their antenatal care. In contrast, only 16% regularly counted fetal movements and many described counting as confusing and reported that the advice they had received on counting differed. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to use qualitative analysis to identify that pregnant women perceive fetal movements and can describe them in a relatively homogenous way throughout pregnancy that follow a general pattern of fetal growth and development. These findings suggest that women’s perception of fetal wellbeing based on their own assessment of fetal movement is used in an ad hoc method in antenatal care by clinicians. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3572429 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35724292013-02-14 A cross-sectional study of maternal perception of fetal movements and antenatal advice in a general pregnant population, using a qualitative framework Raynes-Greenow, Camille H Gordon, Adrienne Li, Qiushuang Hyett, Jon A BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Maternal perception of fetal movements has been used as a measure of fetal well-being. Yet a Cochrane review does not recommend formal fetal movement counting compared to discretional fetal movement counting. There is some evidence that suggests that the quality of fetal movements can precede quantitative changes however there has been almost no assessment of how women describe movements and whether these descriptions may be useful in a clinical setting. Therefore we aimed to examine maternal perception of fetal movements using a qualitative framework. METHODS: Using a cross-sectional design we identified women during routine antenatal care at a tertiary referral hospital, in Sydney, Australia. Eligible women were pregnant ≥ 28 weeks, carrying a single child, > 18 years old, and with sufficient English literacy to self-complete a questionnaire. Post-natally the medical records were reviewed and demographic, pregnancy and fetal outcome data were extracted. Text responses to questions regarding maternal descriptions of fetal movements throughout pregnancy, were analysed using thematic analysis in an explicit process. RESULTS: 156 women participated. There was a general pattern to fetal movement descriptions with increasing gestation, beginning with words such as “gentle”, to descriptions of “strong” and “limb” movements, and finally to “whole body” movements. Women perceived and described qualitative changes to fetal movements that changed throughout gestation. The majority (83%) reported that they were asked to assess fetal movements in an implicit qualitative method during their antenatal care. In contrast, only 16% regularly counted fetal movements and many described counting as confusing and reported that the advice they had received on counting differed. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to use qualitative analysis to identify that pregnant women perceive fetal movements and can describe them in a relatively homogenous way throughout pregnancy that follow a general pattern of fetal growth and development. These findings suggest that women’s perception of fetal wellbeing based on their own assessment of fetal movement is used in an ad hoc method in antenatal care by clinicians. BioMed Central 2013-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3572429/ /pubmed/23383737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-32 Text en Copyright ©2013 Raynes-Greenow et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Raynes-Greenow, Camille H Gordon, Adrienne Li, Qiushuang Hyett, Jon A A cross-sectional study of maternal perception of fetal movements and antenatal advice in a general pregnant population, using a qualitative framework |
title | A cross-sectional study of maternal perception of fetal movements and antenatal advice in a general pregnant population, using a qualitative framework |
title_full | A cross-sectional study of maternal perception of fetal movements and antenatal advice in a general pregnant population, using a qualitative framework |
title_fullStr | A cross-sectional study of maternal perception of fetal movements and antenatal advice in a general pregnant population, using a qualitative framework |
title_full_unstemmed | A cross-sectional study of maternal perception of fetal movements and antenatal advice in a general pregnant population, using a qualitative framework |
title_short | A cross-sectional study of maternal perception of fetal movements and antenatal advice in a general pregnant population, using a qualitative framework |
title_sort | cross-sectional study of maternal perception of fetal movements and antenatal advice in a general pregnant population, using a qualitative framework |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3572429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23383737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-32 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raynesgreenowcamilleh acrosssectionalstudyofmaternalperceptionoffetalmovementsandantenataladviceinageneralpregnantpopulationusingaqualitativeframework AT gordonadrienne acrosssectionalstudyofmaternalperceptionoffetalmovementsandantenataladviceinageneralpregnantpopulationusingaqualitativeframework AT liqiushuang acrosssectionalstudyofmaternalperceptionoffetalmovementsandantenataladviceinageneralpregnantpopulationusingaqualitativeframework AT hyettjona acrosssectionalstudyofmaternalperceptionoffetalmovementsandantenataladviceinageneralpregnantpopulationusingaqualitativeframework AT raynesgreenowcamilleh crosssectionalstudyofmaternalperceptionoffetalmovementsandantenataladviceinageneralpregnantpopulationusingaqualitativeframework AT gordonadrienne crosssectionalstudyofmaternalperceptionoffetalmovementsandantenataladviceinageneralpregnantpopulationusingaqualitativeframework AT liqiushuang crosssectionalstudyofmaternalperceptionoffetalmovementsandantenataladviceinageneralpregnantpopulationusingaqualitativeframework AT hyettjona crosssectionalstudyofmaternalperceptionoffetalmovementsandantenataladviceinageneralpregnantpopulationusingaqualitativeframework |