Cargando…

Role of SimMan in teaching clinical skills to preclinical medical students

BACKGROUND: Simulation training has potential in developing clinical skills in pre-clinical medical students, but there is little evidence on its effectiveness. METHODS: Twenty four first year graduate entry preclinical medical students participated in this crossover study. They were divided into tw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Swamy, Meenakshi, Bloomfield, Thomas C, Thomas, Robert H, Singh, Harnaik, Searle, Roger F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3572432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23394435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-20
_version_ 1782259324515516416
author Swamy, Meenakshi
Bloomfield, Thomas C
Thomas, Robert H
Singh, Harnaik
Searle, Roger F
author_facet Swamy, Meenakshi
Bloomfield, Thomas C
Thomas, Robert H
Singh, Harnaik
Searle, Roger F
author_sort Swamy, Meenakshi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Simulation training has potential in developing clinical skills in pre-clinical medical students, but there is little evidence on its effectiveness. METHODS: Twenty four first year graduate entry preclinical medical students participated in this crossover study. They were divided into two groups, one performed chest examination on each other and the other used SimMan. The groups then crossed over. A pretest, midtest and post-test was conducted in which the students answered the same questionnaire with ten questions on knowledge, and confidence levels rated using a 5 point Likert scale. They were assessed formatively using the OSCE marking scheme. At the end of the session, 23 students completed a feedback questionnaire. Data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA and independent t-test. RESULTS: When the two groups were compared, there was no significant difference in the pretest and the post-test scores on knowledge questions whereas the midtest scores increased significantly (P< 0.001) with the group using SimMan initially scoring higher. A significant increase in the test scores was seen between the pre-test and the mid-test for this group (P=0.009). There was a similar albeit non significant trend between the midtest and the post-test for the group using peer examination initially. Mean confidence ratings increased from the pretest to midtest and then further in the post-test for both groups. Their confidence ratings increased significantly in differentiating between normal and abnormal signs [Group starting with SimMan, between pretest and midtest (P= 0.01) and group starting with peer examination, between midtest and post-test (P=0.02)]. When the students’ ability to perform examination on each other for both groups was compared, there was a significant increase in the scores of the group starting with SimMan (P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrated a significant improvement in the students’ knowledge and competence to perform chest examination after simulation with an increase in the student’s perceived levels of confidence. Feedback from the students was extremely positive. SimMan acts as a useful adjunct to teach clinical skills to preclinical medical students by providing a simulated safe environment and thus aids in bridging the gap between the preclinical and clinical years in medical undergraduate education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3572432
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35724322013-02-14 Role of SimMan in teaching clinical skills to preclinical medical students Swamy, Meenakshi Bloomfield, Thomas C Thomas, Robert H Singh, Harnaik Searle, Roger F BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Simulation training has potential in developing clinical skills in pre-clinical medical students, but there is little evidence on its effectiveness. METHODS: Twenty four first year graduate entry preclinical medical students participated in this crossover study. They were divided into two groups, one performed chest examination on each other and the other used SimMan. The groups then crossed over. A pretest, midtest and post-test was conducted in which the students answered the same questionnaire with ten questions on knowledge, and confidence levels rated using a 5 point Likert scale. They were assessed formatively using the OSCE marking scheme. At the end of the session, 23 students completed a feedback questionnaire. Data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA and independent t-test. RESULTS: When the two groups were compared, there was no significant difference in the pretest and the post-test scores on knowledge questions whereas the midtest scores increased significantly (P< 0.001) with the group using SimMan initially scoring higher. A significant increase in the test scores was seen between the pre-test and the mid-test for this group (P=0.009). There was a similar albeit non significant trend between the midtest and the post-test for the group using peer examination initially. Mean confidence ratings increased from the pretest to midtest and then further in the post-test for both groups. Their confidence ratings increased significantly in differentiating between normal and abnormal signs [Group starting with SimMan, between pretest and midtest (P= 0.01) and group starting with peer examination, between midtest and post-test (P=0.02)]. When the students’ ability to perform examination on each other for both groups was compared, there was a significant increase in the scores of the group starting with SimMan (P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrated a significant improvement in the students’ knowledge and competence to perform chest examination after simulation with an increase in the student’s perceived levels of confidence. Feedback from the students was extremely positive. SimMan acts as a useful adjunct to teach clinical skills to preclinical medical students by providing a simulated safe environment and thus aids in bridging the gap between the preclinical and clinical years in medical undergraduate education. BioMed Central 2013-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3572432/ /pubmed/23394435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-20 Text en Copyright ©2013 Swamy et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Swamy, Meenakshi
Bloomfield, Thomas C
Thomas, Robert H
Singh, Harnaik
Searle, Roger F
Role of SimMan in teaching clinical skills to preclinical medical students
title Role of SimMan in teaching clinical skills to preclinical medical students
title_full Role of SimMan in teaching clinical skills to preclinical medical students
title_fullStr Role of SimMan in teaching clinical skills to preclinical medical students
title_full_unstemmed Role of SimMan in teaching clinical skills to preclinical medical students
title_short Role of SimMan in teaching clinical skills to preclinical medical students
title_sort role of simman in teaching clinical skills to preclinical medical students
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3572432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23394435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-20
work_keys_str_mv AT swamymeenakshi roleofsimmaninteachingclinicalskillstopreclinicalmedicalstudents
AT bloomfieldthomasc roleofsimmaninteachingclinicalskillstopreclinicalmedicalstudents
AT thomasroberth roleofsimmaninteachingclinicalskillstopreclinicalmedicalstudents
AT singhharnaik roleofsimmaninteachingclinicalskillstopreclinicalmedicalstudents
AT searlerogerf roleofsimmaninteachingclinicalskillstopreclinicalmedicalstudents