Cargando…

Arrhythmias following Revascularization Procedures in the Course of Acute Myocardial Infarction: Are They Indicators of Reperfusion or Ongoing Ischemia?

Objective. The most important step in the treatment of ST elevation myocardial infarction is to sustain myocardial blood supply as soon as possible. The two main treatment methods used today to provide myocardial reperfusion are thrombolytic therapy and percutaneous coronary intervention. In our stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tatli, Ersan, Alicik, Güray, Buturak, Ali, Yilmaztepe, Mustafa, Aktoz, Meryem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3572688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23431252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/160380
_version_ 1782259345612865536
author Tatli, Ersan
Alicik, Güray
Buturak, Ali
Yilmaztepe, Mustafa
Aktoz, Meryem
author_facet Tatli, Ersan
Alicik, Güray
Buturak, Ali
Yilmaztepe, Mustafa
Aktoz, Meryem
author_sort Tatli, Ersan
collection PubMed
description Objective. The most important step in the treatment of ST elevation myocardial infarction is to sustain myocardial blood supply as soon as possible. The two main treatment methods used today to provide myocardial reperfusion are thrombolytic therapy and percutaneous coronary intervention. In our study, reperfusion arrhythmias were investigated as if they are indicators of coronary artery patency or ongoing ischemia after revascularization. Methods. 151 patients with a diagnosis of acute ST elevation myocardial infarction were investigated. 54 patients underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention and 97 patients were treated with thrombolytic therapy. The frequency of reperfusion arrythmias following revascularization procedures in the first 48 hours after admission was examined. The relation between reperfusion arrhythmias, ST segment regression, coronary artery patency, and infarct related artery documented by angiography were analyzed. Results. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the frequency of reperfusion arrhythmias (P = 0.355). Although angiographic vessel patency was higher in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, there was no significant difference between the patency rates of each group with and without reperfusion arrythmias. Conclusion. Our study suggests that recorded arrhythmias following different revascularization procedures in acute ST elevation myocardial infarction may not always indicate vessel patency and reperfusion. Ongoing vascular occlusion and ischemia may lead to various arrhythmias which may not be distinguished from reperfusion arrhythmias.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3572688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35726882013-02-21 Arrhythmias following Revascularization Procedures in the Course of Acute Myocardial Infarction: Are They Indicators of Reperfusion or Ongoing Ischemia? Tatli, Ersan Alicik, Güray Buturak, Ali Yilmaztepe, Mustafa Aktoz, Meryem ScientificWorldJournal Clinical Study Objective. The most important step in the treatment of ST elevation myocardial infarction is to sustain myocardial blood supply as soon as possible. The two main treatment methods used today to provide myocardial reperfusion are thrombolytic therapy and percutaneous coronary intervention. In our study, reperfusion arrhythmias were investigated as if they are indicators of coronary artery patency or ongoing ischemia after revascularization. Methods. 151 patients with a diagnosis of acute ST elevation myocardial infarction were investigated. 54 patients underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention and 97 patients were treated with thrombolytic therapy. The frequency of reperfusion arrythmias following revascularization procedures in the first 48 hours after admission was examined. The relation between reperfusion arrhythmias, ST segment regression, coronary artery patency, and infarct related artery documented by angiography were analyzed. Results. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the frequency of reperfusion arrhythmias (P = 0.355). Although angiographic vessel patency was higher in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, there was no significant difference between the patency rates of each group with and without reperfusion arrythmias. Conclusion. Our study suggests that recorded arrhythmias following different revascularization procedures in acute ST elevation myocardial infarction may not always indicate vessel patency and reperfusion. Ongoing vascular occlusion and ischemia may lead to various arrhythmias which may not be distinguished from reperfusion arrhythmias. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3572688/ /pubmed/23431252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/160380 Text en Copyright © 2013 Ersan Tatli et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Tatli, Ersan
Alicik, Güray
Buturak, Ali
Yilmaztepe, Mustafa
Aktoz, Meryem
Arrhythmias following Revascularization Procedures in the Course of Acute Myocardial Infarction: Are They Indicators of Reperfusion or Ongoing Ischemia?
title Arrhythmias following Revascularization Procedures in the Course of Acute Myocardial Infarction: Are They Indicators of Reperfusion or Ongoing Ischemia?
title_full Arrhythmias following Revascularization Procedures in the Course of Acute Myocardial Infarction: Are They Indicators of Reperfusion or Ongoing Ischemia?
title_fullStr Arrhythmias following Revascularization Procedures in the Course of Acute Myocardial Infarction: Are They Indicators of Reperfusion or Ongoing Ischemia?
title_full_unstemmed Arrhythmias following Revascularization Procedures in the Course of Acute Myocardial Infarction: Are They Indicators of Reperfusion or Ongoing Ischemia?
title_short Arrhythmias following Revascularization Procedures in the Course of Acute Myocardial Infarction: Are They Indicators of Reperfusion or Ongoing Ischemia?
title_sort arrhythmias following revascularization procedures in the course of acute myocardial infarction: are they indicators of reperfusion or ongoing ischemia?
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3572688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23431252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/160380
work_keys_str_mv AT tatliersan arrhythmiasfollowingrevascularizationproceduresinthecourseofacutemyocardialinfarctionaretheyindicatorsofreperfusionorongoingischemia
AT alicikguray arrhythmiasfollowingrevascularizationproceduresinthecourseofacutemyocardialinfarctionaretheyindicatorsofreperfusionorongoingischemia
AT buturakali arrhythmiasfollowingrevascularizationproceduresinthecourseofacutemyocardialinfarctionaretheyindicatorsofreperfusionorongoingischemia
AT yilmaztepemustafa arrhythmiasfollowingrevascularizationproceduresinthecourseofacutemyocardialinfarctionaretheyindicatorsofreperfusionorongoingischemia
AT aktozmeryem arrhythmiasfollowingrevascularizationproceduresinthecourseofacutemyocardialinfarctionaretheyindicatorsofreperfusionorongoingischemia