Cargando…
Identifying Errors in Handwritten Outpatient Prescriptions in Oman
To evaluate and analyze the handwritten outpatient prescriptions and associated error of omissions from four different hospitals in Oman. The study designed was an observational, retrospective and analysis of prescriptions was carried out by table and chart method. A total of 900 prescriptions were...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3573379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23492857 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-1483.104371 |
_version_ | 1782259439550595072 |
---|---|
author | Al Shahaibi, Nadiya MS Al Said, Lamya S Kini, TG Chitme, HR |
author_facet | Al Shahaibi, Nadiya MS Al Said, Lamya S Kini, TG Chitme, HR |
author_sort | Al Shahaibi, Nadiya MS |
collection | PubMed |
description | To evaluate and analyze the handwritten outpatient prescriptions and associated error of omissions from four different hospitals in Oman. The study designed was an observational, retrospective and analysis of prescriptions was carried out by table and chart method. A total of 900 prescriptions were collected between April 2009 to July 2010. The type of error of omissions considered in this analysis includes all three important parts of prescriptions, i.e. superscription, inscription, and subscription. The most common type of superscription error of omission was found to be age (72.44%) and gender (32.66%). More than 46% of prescriptions were incomplete on direction for use, more than 22% of prescriptions were not having the information on dose, and more than 23% of prescriptions omitted the dosage forms of prescribed drugs. The date of dispensing of medications was omitted in all the prescriptions and more than 44% of prescriptions were missing the signature of dispenser. It was also found that more than 4% of prescriptions omitted the prescriber's signature and more than 18% of prescriptions omitted the date of prescription. We conclude from this study that the handwritten prescriptions were associated with significant frequency of minor and major prescription error of omissions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3573379 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35733792013-03-14 Identifying Errors in Handwritten Outpatient Prescriptions in Oman Al Shahaibi, Nadiya MS Al Said, Lamya S Kini, TG Chitme, HR J Young Pharm Pharmacy Practice To evaluate and analyze the handwritten outpatient prescriptions and associated error of omissions from four different hospitals in Oman. The study designed was an observational, retrospective and analysis of prescriptions was carried out by table and chart method. A total of 900 prescriptions were collected between April 2009 to July 2010. The type of error of omissions considered in this analysis includes all three important parts of prescriptions, i.e. superscription, inscription, and subscription. The most common type of superscription error of omission was found to be age (72.44%) and gender (32.66%). More than 46% of prescriptions were incomplete on direction for use, more than 22% of prescriptions were not having the information on dose, and more than 23% of prescriptions omitted the dosage forms of prescribed drugs. The date of dispensing of medications was omitted in all the prescriptions and more than 44% of prescriptions were missing the signature of dispenser. It was also found that more than 4% of prescriptions omitted the prescriber's signature and more than 18% of prescriptions omitted the date of prescription. We conclude from this study that the handwritten prescriptions were associated with significant frequency of minor and major prescription error of omissions. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3573379/ /pubmed/23492857 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-1483.104371 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Young Pharmacists http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacy Practice Al Shahaibi, Nadiya MS Al Said, Lamya S Kini, TG Chitme, HR Identifying Errors in Handwritten Outpatient Prescriptions in Oman |
title | Identifying Errors in Handwritten Outpatient Prescriptions in Oman |
title_full | Identifying Errors in Handwritten Outpatient Prescriptions in Oman |
title_fullStr | Identifying Errors in Handwritten Outpatient Prescriptions in Oman |
title_full_unstemmed | Identifying Errors in Handwritten Outpatient Prescriptions in Oman |
title_short | Identifying Errors in Handwritten Outpatient Prescriptions in Oman |
title_sort | identifying errors in handwritten outpatient prescriptions in oman |
topic | Pharmacy Practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3573379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23492857 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-1483.104371 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alshahaibinadiyams identifyingerrorsinhandwrittenoutpatientprescriptionsinoman AT alsaidlamyas identifyingerrorsinhandwrittenoutpatientprescriptionsinoman AT kinitg identifyingerrorsinhandwrittenoutpatientprescriptionsinoman AT chitmehr identifyingerrorsinhandwrittenoutpatientprescriptionsinoman |