Cargando…

Single Fraction versus Multiple Fraction Radiotherapy for Palliation of Painful Vertebral Bone Metastases: A Prospective Study

CONTEXT: Metastatic bone disease is a commonly encountered problem in oncology practice. The most useful and cost effective treatment is radiotherapy (RT). Different fractionation schedule of RT can be used to treat such condition. AIMS: Assessment of pain response in patients with vertebral bone me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Majumder, Dipanjan, Chatterjee, Debashis, Bandyopadhyay, Anis, Mallick, Swapan Kumar, Sarkar, Shyamal Kumar, Majumdar, Anjali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3573475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23440009
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-1075.105691
_version_ 1782259448229658624
author Majumder, Dipanjan
Chatterjee, Debashis
Bandyopadhyay, Anis
Mallick, Swapan Kumar
Sarkar, Shyamal Kumar
Majumdar, Anjali
author_facet Majumder, Dipanjan
Chatterjee, Debashis
Bandyopadhyay, Anis
Mallick, Swapan Kumar
Sarkar, Shyamal Kumar
Majumdar, Anjali
author_sort Majumder, Dipanjan
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Metastatic bone disease is a commonly encountered problem in oncology practice. The most useful and cost effective treatment is radiotherapy (RT). Different fractionation schedule of RT can be used to treat such condition. AIMS: Assessment of pain response in patients with vertebral bone metastasis after treating them with various radiation fractionations and to compare the toxicity profile in the treatment arms. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A prospective randomized study was designed to include total 64 patients from July 2010 to May 2011. Patients with histopathologically proven primary malignancy having symptomatic secondary deposits to vertebra were selected for the study. Patients were randomized to two arms receiving multiple fraction of RT with 30 Gy in 10 fractions and 8 Gy in single fraction RT, respectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with age >75 years, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) <40, features of cord compression were excluded from study. Initial pain response was assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and compared using the same scale at weekly interval up to 1 month after treatment completion. RESULTS: Arm A comprised of 33 patients while 31 patients were enrolled in Arm B. Baseline patient characteristics were comparable. Eleven patients were lost to follow-up. Initial pain scores were 7.23 ± 0.765 and 7.51 ± 0.55 in arm A and arm B, respectively. Pain scores reduced significantly in both the arms after 1 month (4.39 ± 1.82 in arm A; 5.25 ± 2.39 in arm B). Time of initiation of pain response was earlier in arm A (P = 0.0281), statistically significant. Mild G-I toxicity was noted in both the arms but differences in two arms were not statistically significant (P = 0.49), no interruption of treatment was required because of side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Different fractionation of radiation has same response and toxicity in treatment of vertebral bone metastasis. Single fraction RT may be safely used to treat these cases as this is more cost effective and less time consuming. Studies may be conducted to find out particular subgroup of patients to be benefitted more by either fractionation schedule; however, our study cannot comment on that issue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3573475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35734752013-02-22 Single Fraction versus Multiple Fraction Radiotherapy for Palliation of Painful Vertebral Bone Metastases: A Prospective Study Majumder, Dipanjan Chatterjee, Debashis Bandyopadhyay, Anis Mallick, Swapan Kumar Sarkar, Shyamal Kumar Majumdar, Anjali Indian J Palliat Care Original Article CONTEXT: Metastatic bone disease is a commonly encountered problem in oncology practice. The most useful and cost effective treatment is radiotherapy (RT). Different fractionation schedule of RT can be used to treat such condition. AIMS: Assessment of pain response in patients with vertebral bone metastasis after treating them with various radiation fractionations and to compare the toxicity profile in the treatment arms. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A prospective randomized study was designed to include total 64 patients from July 2010 to May 2011. Patients with histopathologically proven primary malignancy having symptomatic secondary deposits to vertebra were selected for the study. Patients were randomized to two arms receiving multiple fraction of RT with 30 Gy in 10 fractions and 8 Gy in single fraction RT, respectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with age >75 years, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) <40, features of cord compression were excluded from study. Initial pain response was assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and compared using the same scale at weekly interval up to 1 month after treatment completion. RESULTS: Arm A comprised of 33 patients while 31 patients were enrolled in Arm B. Baseline patient characteristics were comparable. Eleven patients were lost to follow-up. Initial pain scores were 7.23 ± 0.765 and 7.51 ± 0.55 in arm A and arm B, respectively. Pain scores reduced significantly in both the arms after 1 month (4.39 ± 1.82 in arm A; 5.25 ± 2.39 in arm B). Time of initiation of pain response was earlier in arm A (P = 0.0281), statistically significant. Mild G-I toxicity was noted in both the arms but differences in two arms were not statistically significant (P = 0.49), no interruption of treatment was required because of side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Different fractionation of radiation has same response and toxicity in treatment of vertebral bone metastasis. Single fraction RT may be safely used to treat these cases as this is more cost effective and less time consuming. Studies may be conducted to find out particular subgroup of patients to be benefitted more by either fractionation schedule; however, our study cannot comment on that issue. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3573475/ /pubmed/23440009 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-1075.105691 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Palliative Care http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Majumder, Dipanjan
Chatterjee, Debashis
Bandyopadhyay, Anis
Mallick, Swapan Kumar
Sarkar, Shyamal Kumar
Majumdar, Anjali
Single Fraction versus Multiple Fraction Radiotherapy for Palliation of Painful Vertebral Bone Metastases: A Prospective Study
title Single Fraction versus Multiple Fraction Radiotherapy for Palliation of Painful Vertebral Bone Metastases: A Prospective Study
title_full Single Fraction versus Multiple Fraction Radiotherapy for Palliation of Painful Vertebral Bone Metastases: A Prospective Study
title_fullStr Single Fraction versus Multiple Fraction Radiotherapy for Palliation of Painful Vertebral Bone Metastases: A Prospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Single Fraction versus Multiple Fraction Radiotherapy for Palliation of Painful Vertebral Bone Metastases: A Prospective Study
title_short Single Fraction versus Multiple Fraction Radiotherapy for Palliation of Painful Vertebral Bone Metastases: A Prospective Study
title_sort single fraction versus multiple fraction radiotherapy for palliation of painful vertebral bone metastases: a prospective study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3573475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23440009
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-1075.105691
work_keys_str_mv AT majumderdipanjan singlefractionversusmultiplefractionradiotherapyforpalliationofpainfulvertebralbonemetastasesaprospectivestudy
AT chatterjeedebashis singlefractionversusmultiplefractionradiotherapyforpalliationofpainfulvertebralbonemetastasesaprospectivestudy
AT bandyopadhyayanis singlefractionversusmultiplefractionradiotherapyforpalliationofpainfulvertebralbonemetastasesaprospectivestudy
AT mallickswapankumar singlefractionversusmultiplefractionradiotherapyforpalliationofpainfulvertebralbonemetastasesaprospectivestudy
AT sarkarshyamalkumar singlefractionversusmultiplefractionradiotherapyforpalliationofpainfulvertebralbonemetastasesaprospectivestudy
AT majumdaranjali singlefractionversusmultiplefractionradiotherapyforpalliationofpainfulvertebralbonemetastasesaprospectivestudy