Cargando…

Reconciling the Roles of Kinetic and Thermodynamic Factors in Membrane–Protein Insertion

[Image: see text] For the vast majority of membrane proteins, insertion into a membrane is not direct, but rather is catalyzed by a protein-conducting channel, the translocon. This channel provides a lateral exit into the bilayer while simultaneously offering a pathway into the aqueous lumen. The de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gumbart, James C., Teo, Ivan, Roux, Benoît, Schulten, Klaus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2013
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3573731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23298280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja310777k
_version_ 1782259490371928064
author Gumbart, James C.
Teo, Ivan
Roux, Benoît
Schulten, Klaus
author_facet Gumbart, James C.
Teo, Ivan
Roux, Benoît
Schulten, Klaus
author_sort Gumbart, James C.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] For the vast majority of membrane proteins, insertion into a membrane is not direct, but rather is catalyzed by a protein-conducting channel, the translocon. This channel provides a lateral exit into the bilayer while simultaneously offering a pathway into the aqueous lumen. The determinants of a nascent protein’s choice between these two pathways are not comprehensively understood, although both energetic and kinetic factors have been observed. To elucidate the specific roles of some of these factors, we have carried out extensive all-atom molecular dynamics simulations of different nascent transmembrane segments embedded in a ribosome-bound bacterial translocon, SecY. Simulations on the μs time scale reveal a spontaneous motion of the substrate segment into the membrane or back into the channel, depending on its hydrophobicity. Potential of mean force (PMF) calculations confirm that the observed motion is the result of local free-energy differences between channel and membrane. Based on these and other PMFs, the time-dependent probability of membrane insertion is determined and is shown to mimic a two-state partition scheme with an apparent free energy that is compressed relative to the molecular-level PMFs. It is concluded that insertion kinetics underlies the experimentally observed thermodynamic partitioning process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3573731
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35737312013-02-19 Reconciling the Roles of Kinetic and Thermodynamic Factors in Membrane–Protein Insertion Gumbart, James C. Teo, Ivan Roux, Benoît Schulten, Klaus J Am Chem Soc [Image: see text] For the vast majority of membrane proteins, insertion into a membrane is not direct, but rather is catalyzed by a protein-conducting channel, the translocon. This channel provides a lateral exit into the bilayer while simultaneously offering a pathway into the aqueous lumen. The determinants of a nascent protein’s choice between these two pathways are not comprehensively understood, although both energetic and kinetic factors have been observed. To elucidate the specific roles of some of these factors, we have carried out extensive all-atom molecular dynamics simulations of different nascent transmembrane segments embedded in a ribosome-bound bacterial translocon, SecY. Simulations on the μs time scale reveal a spontaneous motion of the substrate segment into the membrane or back into the channel, depending on its hydrophobicity. Potential of mean force (PMF) calculations confirm that the observed motion is the result of local free-energy differences between channel and membrane. Based on these and other PMFs, the time-dependent probability of membrane insertion is determined and is shown to mimic a two-state partition scheme with an apparent free energy that is compressed relative to the molecular-level PMFs. It is concluded that insertion kinetics underlies the experimentally observed thermodynamic partitioning process. American Chemical Society 2013-01-08 2013-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3573731/ /pubmed/23298280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja310777k Text en Copyright © 2013 American Chemical Society http://pubs.acs.org This is an open-access article distributed under the ACS AuthorChoice Terms & Conditions. Any use of this article, must conform to the terms of that license which are available at http://pubs.acs.org.
spellingShingle Gumbart, James C.
Teo, Ivan
Roux, Benoît
Schulten, Klaus
Reconciling the Roles of Kinetic and Thermodynamic Factors in Membrane–Protein Insertion
title Reconciling the Roles of Kinetic and Thermodynamic Factors in Membrane–Protein Insertion
title_full Reconciling the Roles of Kinetic and Thermodynamic Factors in Membrane–Protein Insertion
title_fullStr Reconciling the Roles of Kinetic and Thermodynamic Factors in Membrane–Protein Insertion
title_full_unstemmed Reconciling the Roles of Kinetic and Thermodynamic Factors in Membrane–Protein Insertion
title_short Reconciling the Roles of Kinetic and Thermodynamic Factors in Membrane–Protein Insertion
title_sort reconciling the roles of kinetic and thermodynamic factors in membrane–protein insertion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3573731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23298280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja310777k
work_keys_str_mv AT gumbartjamesc reconcilingtherolesofkineticandthermodynamicfactorsinmembraneproteininsertion
AT teoivan reconcilingtherolesofkineticandthermodynamicfactorsinmembraneproteininsertion
AT rouxbenoit reconcilingtherolesofkineticandthermodynamicfactorsinmembraneproteininsertion
AT schultenklaus reconcilingtherolesofkineticandthermodynamicfactorsinmembraneproteininsertion