Cargando…
Reconciling the Roles of Kinetic and Thermodynamic Factors in Membrane–Protein Insertion
[Image: see text] For the vast majority of membrane proteins, insertion into a membrane is not direct, but rather is catalyzed by a protein-conducting channel, the translocon. This channel provides a lateral exit into the bilayer while simultaneously offering a pathway into the aqueous lumen. The de...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2013
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3573731/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23298280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja310777k |
_version_ | 1782259490371928064 |
---|---|
author | Gumbart, James C. Teo, Ivan Roux, Benoît Schulten, Klaus |
author_facet | Gumbart, James C. Teo, Ivan Roux, Benoît Schulten, Klaus |
author_sort | Gumbart, James C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] For the vast majority of membrane proteins, insertion into a membrane is not direct, but rather is catalyzed by a protein-conducting channel, the translocon. This channel provides a lateral exit into the bilayer while simultaneously offering a pathway into the aqueous lumen. The determinants of a nascent protein’s choice between these two pathways are not comprehensively understood, although both energetic and kinetic factors have been observed. To elucidate the specific roles of some of these factors, we have carried out extensive all-atom molecular dynamics simulations of different nascent transmembrane segments embedded in a ribosome-bound bacterial translocon, SecY. Simulations on the μs time scale reveal a spontaneous motion of the substrate segment into the membrane or back into the channel, depending on its hydrophobicity. Potential of mean force (PMF) calculations confirm that the observed motion is the result of local free-energy differences between channel and membrane. Based on these and other PMFs, the time-dependent probability of membrane insertion is determined and is shown to mimic a two-state partition scheme with an apparent free energy that is compressed relative to the molecular-level PMFs. It is concluded that insertion kinetics underlies the experimentally observed thermodynamic partitioning process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3573731 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35737312013-02-19 Reconciling the Roles of Kinetic and Thermodynamic Factors in Membrane–Protein Insertion Gumbart, James C. Teo, Ivan Roux, Benoît Schulten, Klaus J Am Chem Soc [Image: see text] For the vast majority of membrane proteins, insertion into a membrane is not direct, but rather is catalyzed by a protein-conducting channel, the translocon. This channel provides a lateral exit into the bilayer while simultaneously offering a pathway into the aqueous lumen. The determinants of a nascent protein’s choice between these two pathways are not comprehensively understood, although both energetic and kinetic factors have been observed. To elucidate the specific roles of some of these factors, we have carried out extensive all-atom molecular dynamics simulations of different nascent transmembrane segments embedded in a ribosome-bound bacterial translocon, SecY. Simulations on the μs time scale reveal a spontaneous motion of the substrate segment into the membrane or back into the channel, depending on its hydrophobicity. Potential of mean force (PMF) calculations confirm that the observed motion is the result of local free-energy differences between channel and membrane. Based on these and other PMFs, the time-dependent probability of membrane insertion is determined and is shown to mimic a two-state partition scheme with an apparent free energy that is compressed relative to the molecular-level PMFs. It is concluded that insertion kinetics underlies the experimentally observed thermodynamic partitioning process. American Chemical Society 2013-01-08 2013-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3573731/ /pubmed/23298280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja310777k Text en Copyright © 2013 American Chemical Society http://pubs.acs.org This is an open-access article distributed under the ACS AuthorChoice Terms & Conditions. Any use of this article, must conform to the terms of that license which are available at http://pubs.acs.org. |
spellingShingle | Gumbart, James C. Teo, Ivan Roux, Benoît Schulten, Klaus Reconciling the Roles of Kinetic and Thermodynamic Factors in Membrane–Protein Insertion |
title | Reconciling the Roles
of Kinetic and Thermodynamic
Factors in Membrane–Protein Insertion |
title_full | Reconciling the Roles
of Kinetic and Thermodynamic
Factors in Membrane–Protein Insertion |
title_fullStr | Reconciling the Roles
of Kinetic and Thermodynamic
Factors in Membrane–Protein Insertion |
title_full_unstemmed | Reconciling the Roles
of Kinetic and Thermodynamic
Factors in Membrane–Protein Insertion |
title_short | Reconciling the Roles
of Kinetic and Thermodynamic
Factors in Membrane–Protein Insertion |
title_sort | reconciling the roles
of kinetic and thermodynamic
factors in membrane–protein insertion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3573731/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23298280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja310777k |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gumbartjamesc reconcilingtherolesofkineticandthermodynamicfactorsinmembraneproteininsertion AT teoivan reconcilingtherolesofkineticandthermodynamicfactorsinmembraneproteininsertion AT rouxbenoit reconcilingtherolesofkineticandthermodynamicfactorsinmembraneproteininsertion AT schultenklaus reconcilingtherolesofkineticandthermodynamicfactorsinmembraneproteininsertion |