Cargando…

Cell-type specificity of ChIP-predicted transcription factor binding sites

BACKGROUND: Context-dependent transcription factor (TF) binding is one reason for differences in gene expression patterns between different cellular states. Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by high-throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq) identifies genome-wide TF binding sites for one particular cont...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Håndstad, Tony, Rye, Morten, Močnik, Rok, Drabløs, Finn, Sætrom, Pål
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3574057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22863112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-372
_version_ 1782259558314409984
author Håndstad, Tony
Rye, Morten
Močnik, Rok
Drabløs, Finn
Sætrom, Pål
author_facet Håndstad, Tony
Rye, Morten
Močnik, Rok
Drabløs, Finn
Sætrom, Pål
author_sort Håndstad, Tony
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Context-dependent transcription factor (TF) binding is one reason for differences in gene expression patterns between different cellular states. Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by high-throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq) identifies genome-wide TF binding sites for one particular context—the cells used in the experiment. But can such ChIP-seq data predict TF binding in other cellular contexts and is it possible to distinguish context-dependent from ubiquitous TF binding? RESULTS: We compared ChIP-seq data on TF binding for multiple TFs in two different cell types and found that on average only a third of ChIP-seq peak regions are common to both cell types. Expectedly, common peaks occur more frequently in certain genomic contexts, such as CpG-rich promoters, whereas chromatin differences characterize cell-type specific TF binding. We also find, however, that genotype differences between the cell types can explain differences in binding. Moreover, ChIP-seq signal intensity and peak clustering are the strongest predictors of common peaks. Compared with strong peaks located in regions containing peaks for multiple transcription factors, weak and isolated peaks are less common between the cell types and are less associated with data that indicate regulatory activity. CONCLUSIONS: Together, the results suggest that experimental noise is prevalent among weak peaks, whereas strong and clustered peaks represent high-confidence binding events that often occur in other cellular contexts. Nevertheless, 30-40% of the strongest and most clustered peaks show context-dependent regulation. We show that by combining signal intensity with additional data—ranging from context independent information such as binding site conservation and position weight matrix scores to context dependent chromatin structure—we can predict whether a ChIP-seq peak is likely to be present in other cellular contexts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3574057
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35740572013-02-16 Cell-type specificity of ChIP-predicted transcription factor binding sites Håndstad, Tony Rye, Morten Močnik, Rok Drabløs, Finn Sætrom, Pål BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Context-dependent transcription factor (TF) binding is one reason for differences in gene expression patterns between different cellular states. Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by high-throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq) identifies genome-wide TF binding sites for one particular context—the cells used in the experiment. But can such ChIP-seq data predict TF binding in other cellular contexts and is it possible to distinguish context-dependent from ubiquitous TF binding? RESULTS: We compared ChIP-seq data on TF binding for multiple TFs in two different cell types and found that on average only a third of ChIP-seq peak regions are common to both cell types. Expectedly, common peaks occur more frequently in certain genomic contexts, such as CpG-rich promoters, whereas chromatin differences characterize cell-type specific TF binding. We also find, however, that genotype differences between the cell types can explain differences in binding. Moreover, ChIP-seq signal intensity and peak clustering are the strongest predictors of common peaks. Compared with strong peaks located in regions containing peaks for multiple transcription factors, weak and isolated peaks are less common between the cell types and are less associated with data that indicate regulatory activity. CONCLUSIONS: Together, the results suggest that experimental noise is prevalent among weak peaks, whereas strong and clustered peaks represent high-confidence binding events that often occur in other cellular contexts. Nevertheless, 30-40% of the strongest and most clustered peaks show context-dependent regulation. We show that by combining signal intensity with additional data—ranging from context independent information such as binding site conservation and position weight matrix scores to context dependent chromatin structure—we can predict whether a ChIP-seq peak is likely to be present in other cellular contexts. BioMed Central 2012-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3574057/ /pubmed/22863112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-372 Text en Copyright ©2012 Håndstad et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Håndstad, Tony
Rye, Morten
Močnik, Rok
Drabløs, Finn
Sætrom, Pål
Cell-type specificity of ChIP-predicted transcription factor binding sites
title Cell-type specificity of ChIP-predicted transcription factor binding sites
title_full Cell-type specificity of ChIP-predicted transcription factor binding sites
title_fullStr Cell-type specificity of ChIP-predicted transcription factor binding sites
title_full_unstemmed Cell-type specificity of ChIP-predicted transcription factor binding sites
title_short Cell-type specificity of ChIP-predicted transcription factor binding sites
title_sort cell-type specificity of chip-predicted transcription factor binding sites
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3574057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22863112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-372
work_keys_str_mv AT handstadtony celltypespecificityofchippredictedtranscriptionfactorbindingsites
AT ryemorten celltypespecificityofchippredictedtranscriptionfactorbindingsites
AT mocnikrok celltypespecificityofchippredictedtranscriptionfactorbindingsites
AT drabløsfinn celltypespecificityofchippredictedtranscriptionfactorbindingsites
AT sætrompal celltypespecificityofchippredictedtranscriptionfactorbindingsites