Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of laser Doppler imaging in burn care in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND: Early accurate assessment of burn depth is important to determine the optimal treatment of burns. The method most used to determine burn depth is clinical assessment, which is the least expensive, but not the most accurate. Laser Doppler imaging (LDI) is a technique with which a more acc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hop, M Jenda, Hiddingh, Jakob, Stekelenburg, Carlijn, Kuipers, Hester C, Middelkoop, Esther, Nieuwenhuis, Marianne K, Polinder, Suzanne, van Baar, Margriet E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3574826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23369360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-13-2
_version_ 1782259642293813248
author Hop, M Jenda
Hiddingh, Jakob
Stekelenburg, Carlijn
Kuipers, Hester C
Middelkoop, Esther
Nieuwenhuis, Marianne K
Polinder, Suzanne
van Baar, Margriet E
author_facet Hop, M Jenda
Hiddingh, Jakob
Stekelenburg, Carlijn
Kuipers, Hester C
Middelkoop, Esther
Nieuwenhuis, Marianne K
Polinder, Suzanne
van Baar, Margriet E
author_sort Hop, M Jenda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early accurate assessment of burn depth is important to determine the optimal treatment of burns. The method most used to determine burn depth is clinical assessment, which is the least expensive, but not the most accurate. Laser Doppler imaging (LDI) is a technique with which a more accurate (>95%) estimate of burn depth can be made by measuring the dermal perfusion. The actual effect on therapeutic decisions, clinical outcomes and the costs of the introduction of this device, however, are unknown. Before we decide to implement LDI in Dutch burn care, a study on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of LDI is necessary. METHODS/DESIGN: A multicenter randomised controlled trial will be conducted in the Dutch burn centres: Beverwijk, Groningen and Rotterdam. All patients treated as outpatient or admitted to a burn centre within 5 days post burn, with burns of indeterminate depth (burns not obviously superficial or full thickness) and a total body surface area burned of ≤ 20% are eligible. A total of 200 patients will be included. Burn depth will be diagnosed by both clinical assessment and laser Doppler imaging between 2–5 days post burn in all patients. Subsequently, patients are randomly divided in two groups: ‘new diagnostic strategy’ versus ‘current diagnostic strategy’. The results of the LDI-scan will only be provided to the treating clinician in the ‘new diagnostic strategy’ group. The main endpoint is the effect of LDI on wound healing time. In addition we measure: a) the effect of LDI on other patient outcomes (quality of life, scar quality), b) the effect of LDI on diagnostic and therapeutic decisions, and c) the effect of LDI on total (medical and non-medical) costs and cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: This trial will contribute to our current knowledge on the use of LDI in burn care and will provide evidence on its cost-effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01489540
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3574826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35748262013-02-18 Cost-effectiveness of laser Doppler imaging in burn care in the Netherlands Hop, M Jenda Hiddingh, Jakob Stekelenburg, Carlijn Kuipers, Hester C Middelkoop, Esther Nieuwenhuis, Marianne K Polinder, Suzanne van Baar, Margriet E BMC Surg Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Early accurate assessment of burn depth is important to determine the optimal treatment of burns. The method most used to determine burn depth is clinical assessment, which is the least expensive, but not the most accurate. Laser Doppler imaging (LDI) is a technique with which a more accurate (>95%) estimate of burn depth can be made by measuring the dermal perfusion. The actual effect on therapeutic decisions, clinical outcomes and the costs of the introduction of this device, however, are unknown. Before we decide to implement LDI in Dutch burn care, a study on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of LDI is necessary. METHODS/DESIGN: A multicenter randomised controlled trial will be conducted in the Dutch burn centres: Beverwijk, Groningen and Rotterdam. All patients treated as outpatient or admitted to a burn centre within 5 days post burn, with burns of indeterminate depth (burns not obviously superficial or full thickness) and a total body surface area burned of ≤ 20% are eligible. A total of 200 patients will be included. Burn depth will be diagnosed by both clinical assessment and laser Doppler imaging between 2–5 days post burn in all patients. Subsequently, patients are randomly divided in two groups: ‘new diagnostic strategy’ versus ‘current diagnostic strategy’. The results of the LDI-scan will only be provided to the treating clinician in the ‘new diagnostic strategy’ group. The main endpoint is the effect of LDI on wound healing time. In addition we measure: a) the effect of LDI on other patient outcomes (quality of life, scar quality), b) the effect of LDI on diagnostic and therapeutic decisions, and c) the effect of LDI on total (medical and non-medical) costs and cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: This trial will contribute to our current knowledge on the use of LDI in burn care and will provide evidence on its cost-effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01489540 BioMed Central 2013-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3574826/ /pubmed/23369360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-13-2 Text en Copyright ©2013 Hop et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Hop, M Jenda
Hiddingh, Jakob
Stekelenburg, Carlijn
Kuipers, Hester C
Middelkoop, Esther
Nieuwenhuis, Marianne K
Polinder, Suzanne
van Baar, Margriet E
Cost-effectiveness of laser Doppler imaging in burn care in the Netherlands
title Cost-effectiveness of laser Doppler imaging in burn care in the Netherlands
title_full Cost-effectiveness of laser Doppler imaging in burn care in the Netherlands
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of laser Doppler imaging in burn care in the Netherlands
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of laser Doppler imaging in burn care in the Netherlands
title_short Cost-effectiveness of laser Doppler imaging in burn care in the Netherlands
title_sort cost-effectiveness of laser doppler imaging in burn care in the netherlands
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3574826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23369360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-13-2
work_keys_str_mv AT hopmjenda costeffectivenessoflaserdopplerimaginginburncareinthenetherlands
AT hiddinghjakob costeffectivenessoflaserdopplerimaginginburncareinthenetherlands
AT stekelenburgcarlijn costeffectivenessoflaserdopplerimaginginburncareinthenetherlands
AT kuipershesterc costeffectivenessoflaserdopplerimaginginburncareinthenetherlands
AT middelkoopesther costeffectivenessoflaserdopplerimaginginburncareinthenetherlands
AT nieuwenhuismariannek costeffectivenessoflaserdopplerimaginginburncareinthenetherlands
AT polindersuzanne costeffectivenessoflaserdopplerimaginginburncareinthenetherlands
AT vanbaarmargriete costeffectivenessoflaserdopplerimaginginburncareinthenetherlands