Cargando…

Deposit buildup on prosthetic eye material (in vitro) and its effect on surface wettability

BACKGROUND: The aim of this in-vitro study was to investigate the effect of different polishing standards on prosthetic eye material (poly(methyl methacrylate) [PMMA]) on surface wettability and the rate of protein and lipid buildup. METHODS: Sample disks (12 mm diameter × 1 mm thickness) of PMMA we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pine, Keith Raymond, Sloan, Brian, Han, KyuYeon Ivy, Swift, Simon, Jacobs, Robert John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3575186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23430311
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S40680
_version_ 1782259671369777152
author Pine, Keith Raymond
Sloan, Brian
Han, KyuYeon Ivy
Swift, Simon
Jacobs, Robert John
author_facet Pine, Keith Raymond
Sloan, Brian
Han, KyuYeon Ivy
Swift, Simon
Jacobs, Robert John
author_sort Pine, Keith Raymond
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this in-vitro study was to investigate the effect of different polishing standards on prosthetic eye material (poly(methyl methacrylate) [PMMA]) on surface wettability and the rate of protein and lipid buildup. METHODS: Sample disks (12 mm diameter × 1 mm thickness) of PMMA were polished to three different standards of surface finish: low, normal, and optical quality contact lens standard. The sample disks were incubated in a protein-rich artificial tear solution (ATS) for the following periods of time: 1 second, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 4 hours, 24 hours, and 14 days. Surface wettability was measured with a goniometer before and after protein deposits were removed. One-way analysis of variance and paired-samples t-test were used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: Between 13.64 and 62.88 μg of protein adhered to the sample disks immediately upon immersion in ATS. Sample disks with the highest polish attracted less protein deposits. The sample disks polished to optical quality contact lens standard were more wettable than those less highly polished, and wettability significantly decreased following removal of protein deposits. The addition of lipids to protein-only ATS made no difference to the amount of protein deposited on the sample disks for any of the standards of surface polish tested. CONCLUSION: The findings are consistent with the results of the in-vivo investigation reported previously by the authors. Our view that the minimum standard of polish for prosthetic eyes should be optical quality contact lens standard and that deposits on PMMA prosthetic eyes improve the lubricating properties of the socket fluids has been reinforced by the results of this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3575186
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35751862013-02-21 Deposit buildup on prosthetic eye material (in vitro) and its effect on surface wettability Pine, Keith Raymond Sloan, Brian Han, KyuYeon Ivy Swift, Simon Jacobs, Robert John Clin Ophthalmol Original Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this in-vitro study was to investigate the effect of different polishing standards on prosthetic eye material (poly(methyl methacrylate) [PMMA]) on surface wettability and the rate of protein and lipid buildup. METHODS: Sample disks (12 mm diameter × 1 mm thickness) of PMMA were polished to three different standards of surface finish: low, normal, and optical quality contact lens standard. The sample disks were incubated in a protein-rich artificial tear solution (ATS) for the following periods of time: 1 second, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 4 hours, 24 hours, and 14 days. Surface wettability was measured with a goniometer before and after protein deposits were removed. One-way analysis of variance and paired-samples t-test were used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: Between 13.64 and 62.88 μg of protein adhered to the sample disks immediately upon immersion in ATS. Sample disks with the highest polish attracted less protein deposits. The sample disks polished to optical quality contact lens standard were more wettable than those less highly polished, and wettability significantly decreased following removal of protein deposits. The addition of lipids to protein-only ATS made no difference to the amount of protein deposited on the sample disks for any of the standards of surface polish tested. CONCLUSION: The findings are consistent with the results of the in-vivo investigation reported previously by the authors. Our view that the minimum standard of polish for prosthetic eyes should be optical quality contact lens standard and that deposits on PMMA prosthetic eyes improve the lubricating properties of the socket fluids has been reinforced by the results of this study. Dove Medical Press 2013 2013-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3575186/ /pubmed/23430311 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S40680 Text en © 2013 Pine et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Pine, Keith Raymond
Sloan, Brian
Han, KyuYeon Ivy
Swift, Simon
Jacobs, Robert John
Deposit buildup on prosthetic eye material (in vitro) and its effect on surface wettability
title Deposit buildup on prosthetic eye material (in vitro) and its effect on surface wettability
title_full Deposit buildup on prosthetic eye material (in vitro) and its effect on surface wettability
title_fullStr Deposit buildup on prosthetic eye material (in vitro) and its effect on surface wettability
title_full_unstemmed Deposit buildup on prosthetic eye material (in vitro) and its effect on surface wettability
title_short Deposit buildup on prosthetic eye material (in vitro) and its effect on surface wettability
title_sort deposit buildup on prosthetic eye material (in vitro) and its effect on surface wettability
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3575186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23430311
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S40680
work_keys_str_mv AT pinekeithraymond depositbuilduponprostheticeyematerialinvitroanditseffectonsurfacewettability
AT sloanbrian depositbuilduponprostheticeyematerialinvitroanditseffectonsurfacewettability
AT hankyuyeonivy depositbuilduponprostheticeyematerialinvitroanditseffectonsurfacewettability
AT swiftsimon depositbuilduponprostheticeyematerialinvitroanditseffectonsurfacewettability
AT jacobsrobertjohn depositbuilduponprostheticeyematerialinvitroanditseffectonsurfacewettability