Cargando…

Efficacy of quetiapine in patients with bipolar I and II depression: a multicenter, prospective, open-label, observational study

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the therapeutic efficacy of quetiapine in bipolar I and II depression patients in the clinical setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an 8-week, multicenter, open-label, observational study for bipolar depression. The dosage of quetiapine was flexible, and concomita...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeong, Jong-Hyun, Bahk, Won-Myong, Woo, Young Sup, Seo, Ho-Jun, Hong, Seung-Chul, Jon, Duk-In, Min, Kyung Joon, Yoon, Bo-Hyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3575218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23431086
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S41081
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the therapeutic efficacy of quetiapine in bipolar I and II depression patients in the clinical setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an 8-week, multicenter, open-label, observational study for bipolar depression. The dosage of quetiapine was flexible, and concomitant medications were permitted on clinician’s judgments. A total of 1097 patients were enrolled, and 764 bipolar depression patients who exhibited good therapeutic compliance (>75% compliance rate) were analyzed. RESULTS: Clinical Global Impression – Bipolar scale and Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale scores were significantly improved at weeks four and eight compared with the baseline scores. At the end of the 8-week study, the response rate was 58.9%, and the remission rate was 42.1%. However, there were no significant differences in the response and remission rates between bipolar I and II disorder (BD-I and BD-II) patients (response rate 60.1% versus 56.3%; remission rate 44.5% versus 37.0%). Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale score at baseline (β = 0.612, P < 0.001), duration of current episode (β = −0.152, P = 0.001), and presence of remission on previous episode (β = 0.111, P = 0.012) were significantly associated with improvements in depressive symptoms. Fatigue (16.0%), somnolence (14.9%), and manic/hypomanic switching (0.6% at week four, 0.3% at week eight) were observed throughout the study period. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that quetiapine improves depressive symptoms in BD-I and BD-II patients with a minimal incidence of manic switching. The therapeutic efficacy of quetiapine increased with time. Quetiapine could be an effective and safe modality for the treatment of BD-I and BD-II.