Cargando…
Comparisons of protein profiles of beech bark disease resistant and susceptible American beech (Fagus grandifolia)
BACKGROUND: Beech bark disease is an insect-fungus complex that damages and often kills American beech trees and has major ecological and economic impacts on forests of the northeastern United States and southeastern Canadian forests. The disease begins when exotic beech scale insects feed on the ba...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3575302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23317283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-5956-11-2 |
_version_ | 1782259696763142144 |
---|---|
author | Mason, Mary E Koch, Jennifer L Krasowski, Marek Loo, Judy |
author_facet | Mason, Mary E Koch, Jennifer L Krasowski, Marek Loo, Judy |
author_sort | Mason, Mary E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Beech bark disease is an insect-fungus complex that damages and often kills American beech trees and has major ecological and economic impacts on forests of the northeastern United States and southeastern Canadian forests. The disease begins when exotic beech scale insects feed on the bark of trees, and is followed by infection of damaged bark tissues by one of the Neonectria species of fungi. Proteomic analysis was conducted of beech bark proteins from diseased trees and healthy trees in areas heavily infested with beech bark disease. All of the diseased trees had signs of Neonectria infection such as cankers or fruiting bodies. In previous tests reported elsewhere, all of the diseased trees were demonstrated to be susceptible to the scale insect and all of the healthy trees were demonstrated to be resistant to the scale insect. Sixteen trees were sampled from eight geographically isolated stands, the sample consisting of 10 healthy (scale-resistant) and 6 diseased/infested (scale-susceptible) trees. RESULTS: Proteins were extracted from each tree and analysed in triplicate by isoelectric focusing followed by denaturing gel electrophoresis. Gels were stained and protein spots identified and intensity quantified, then a statistical model was fit to identify significant differences between trees. A subset of BBD differential proteins were analysed by mass spectrometry and matched to known protein sequences for identification. Identified proteins had homology to stress, insect, and pathogen related proteins in other plant systems. Protein spots significantly different in diseased and healthy trees having no stand or disease-by-stand interaction effects were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Further study of these proteins should help to understand processes critical to resistance to beech bark disease and to develop biomarkers for use in tree breeding programs and for the selection of resistant trees prior to or in early stages of BBD development in stands. Early identification of resistant trees (prior to the full disease development in an area) will allow forest management through the removal of susceptible trees and their root-sprouts prior to the onset of disease, allowing management and mitigation of costs, economic impact, and impacts on ecological systems and services. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3575302 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35753022013-02-22 Comparisons of protein profiles of beech bark disease resistant and susceptible American beech (Fagus grandifolia) Mason, Mary E Koch, Jennifer L Krasowski, Marek Loo, Judy Proteome Sci Research BACKGROUND: Beech bark disease is an insect-fungus complex that damages and often kills American beech trees and has major ecological and economic impacts on forests of the northeastern United States and southeastern Canadian forests. The disease begins when exotic beech scale insects feed on the bark of trees, and is followed by infection of damaged bark tissues by one of the Neonectria species of fungi. Proteomic analysis was conducted of beech bark proteins from diseased trees and healthy trees in areas heavily infested with beech bark disease. All of the diseased trees had signs of Neonectria infection such as cankers or fruiting bodies. In previous tests reported elsewhere, all of the diseased trees were demonstrated to be susceptible to the scale insect and all of the healthy trees were demonstrated to be resistant to the scale insect. Sixteen trees were sampled from eight geographically isolated stands, the sample consisting of 10 healthy (scale-resistant) and 6 diseased/infested (scale-susceptible) trees. RESULTS: Proteins were extracted from each tree and analysed in triplicate by isoelectric focusing followed by denaturing gel electrophoresis. Gels were stained and protein spots identified and intensity quantified, then a statistical model was fit to identify significant differences between trees. A subset of BBD differential proteins were analysed by mass spectrometry and matched to known protein sequences for identification. Identified proteins had homology to stress, insect, and pathogen related proteins in other plant systems. Protein spots significantly different in diseased and healthy trees having no stand or disease-by-stand interaction effects were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Further study of these proteins should help to understand processes critical to resistance to beech bark disease and to develop biomarkers for use in tree breeding programs and for the selection of resistant trees prior to or in early stages of BBD development in stands. Early identification of resistant trees (prior to the full disease development in an area) will allow forest management through the removal of susceptible trees and their root-sprouts prior to the onset of disease, allowing management and mitigation of costs, economic impact, and impacts on ecological systems and services. BioMed Central 2013-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3575302/ /pubmed/23317283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-5956-11-2 Text en Copyright ©2013 Mason et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Mason, Mary E Koch, Jennifer L Krasowski, Marek Loo, Judy Comparisons of protein profiles of beech bark disease resistant and susceptible American beech (Fagus grandifolia) |
title | Comparisons of protein profiles of beech bark disease resistant and susceptible American beech (Fagus grandifolia) |
title_full | Comparisons of protein profiles of beech bark disease resistant and susceptible American beech (Fagus grandifolia) |
title_fullStr | Comparisons of protein profiles of beech bark disease resistant and susceptible American beech (Fagus grandifolia) |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparisons of protein profiles of beech bark disease resistant and susceptible American beech (Fagus grandifolia) |
title_short | Comparisons of protein profiles of beech bark disease resistant and susceptible American beech (Fagus grandifolia) |
title_sort | comparisons of protein profiles of beech bark disease resistant and susceptible american beech (fagus grandifolia) |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3575302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23317283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-5956-11-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT masonmarye comparisonsofproteinprofilesofbeechbarkdiseaseresistantandsusceptibleamericanbeechfagusgrandifolia AT kochjenniferl comparisonsofproteinprofilesofbeechbarkdiseaseresistantandsusceptibleamericanbeechfagusgrandifolia AT krasowskimarek comparisonsofproteinprofilesofbeechbarkdiseaseresistantandsusceptibleamericanbeechfagusgrandifolia AT loojudy comparisonsofproteinprofilesofbeechbarkdiseaseresistantandsusceptibleamericanbeechfagusgrandifolia |