Cargando…
The performance of the K10, K6 and GHQ-12 to screen for present state DSM-IV disorders among disability claimants
BACKGROUND: Screening for mental disorders among disability claimants is important, since mental disorders seem to be seriously under-recognized in this population. However, performance of potentially suitable scales is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of three scales, the 1...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3575398/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23402478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-128 |
_version_ | 1782259719361003520 |
---|---|
author | Cornelius, Bert LR Groothoff, Johan W van der Klink, Jac JL Brouwer, Sandra |
author_facet | Cornelius, Bert LR Groothoff, Johan W van der Klink, Jac JL Brouwer, Sandra |
author_sort | Cornelius, Bert LR |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Screening for mental disorders among disability claimants is important, since mental disorders seem to be seriously under-recognized in this population. However, performance of potentially suitable scales is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of three scales, the 10- and 6-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10, K6) and the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), to predict present state mental disorders, classified according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4(th)Edition (DSM-IV) among disability claimants. METHODS: All scales were completed by a representative sample of persons claiming disability benefit after two years sickness absence (n=293). All diagnoses, both somatic and mental, were included. The gold standard was the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 3.0) to diagnose present state DSM-IV disorder. Cronbach’s α, sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV), and the areas under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated. RESULTS: Cronbach’s alpha’s were 0.919 (K10), 0.882 (K6) and 0.906 (GHQ-12). The optimal cut-off scores were 24 (K10), 14 ( K6) and 20 (GHQ-12). The PPV and the NPV for the optimal cut point of the K10 was 0.53 and 0.89, for the K6 0.51 and 0.87, and for the GHQ-12 0.50 and 0.82. The AUC’s for 30-day cases were 0.806 (K10; 95% CI 0.749-0.862), 0.796 (K6; 95% CI 0.737-0.854) and 0.695 (GHQ-12; 95% CI 0.626-0.765). CONCLUSIONS: The K10 and K6 are reliable and valid scales to screen for present state DSM-IV mental disorder. The optimal cut-off scores are 24 (K10) and 14 (K6). The GHQ-12 (optimal cut-off score: 20) is outperformed by the K10 and K6, which are to be preferred above the GHQ-12. The scores on separate items of the K10 and K6 can be used in disability assessment settings as an agenda for an in-depth follow-up clinical interview to ascertain the presence of present state mental disorder. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3575398 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35753982013-02-19 The performance of the K10, K6 and GHQ-12 to screen for present state DSM-IV disorders among disability claimants Cornelius, Bert LR Groothoff, Johan W van der Klink, Jac JL Brouwer, Sandra BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Screening for mental disorders among disability claimants is important, since mental disorders seem to be seriously under-recognized in this population. However, performance of potentially suitable scales is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of three scales, the 10- and 6-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10, K6) and the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), to predict present state mental disorders, classified according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4(th)Edition (DSM-IV) among disability claimants. METHODS: All scales were completed by a representative sample of persons claiming disability benefit after two years sickness absence (n=293). All diagnoses, both somatic and mental, were included. The gold standard was the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 3.0) to diagnose present state DSM-IV disorder. Cronbach’s α, sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV), and the areas under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated. RESULTS: Cronbach’s alpha’s were 0.919 (K10), 0.882 (K6) and 0.906 (GHQ-12). The optimal cut-off scores were 24 (K10), 14 ( K6) and 20 (GHQ-12). The PPV and the NPV for the optimal cut point of the K10 was 0.53 and 0.89, for the K6 0.51 and 0.87, and for the GHQ-12 0.50 and 0.82. The AUC’s for 30-day cases were 0.806 (K10; 95% CI 0.749-0.862), 0.796 (K6; 95% CI 0.737-0.854) and 0.695 (GHQ-12; 95% CI 0.626-0.765). CONCLUSIONS: The K10 and K6 are reliable and valid scales to screen for present state DSM-IV mental disorder. The optimal cut-off scores are 24 (K10) and 14 (K6). The GHQ-12 (optimal cut-off score: 20) is outperformed by the K10 and K6, which are to be preferred above the GHQ-12. The scores on separate items of the K10 and K6 can be used in disability assessment settings as an agenda for an in-depth follow-up clinical interview to ascertain the presence of present state mental disorder. BioMed Central 2013-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3575398/ /pubmed/23402478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-128 Text en Copyright ©2013 Cornelius et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cornelius, Bert LR Groothoff, Johan W van der Klink, Jac JL Brouwer, Sandra The performance of the K10, K6 and GHQ-12 to screen for present state DSM-IV disorders among disability claimants |
title | The performance of the K10, K6 and GHQ-12 to screen for present state DSM-IV disorders among disability claimants |
title_full | The performance of the K10, K6 and GHQ-12 to screen for present state DSM-IV disorders among disability claimants |
title_fullStr | The performance of the K10, K6 and GHQ-12 to screen for present state DSM-IV disorders among disability claimants |
title_full_unstemmed | The performance of the K10, K6 and GHQ-12 to screen for present state DSM-IV disorders among disability claimants |
title_short | The performance of the K10, K6 and GHQ-12 to screen for present state DSM-IV disorders among disability claimants |
title_sort | performance of the k10, k6 and ghq-12 to screen for present state dsm-iv disorders among disability claimants |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3575398/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23402478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-128 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT corneliusbertlr theperformanceofthek10k6andghq12toscreenforpresentstatedsmivdisordersamongdisabilityclaimants AT groothoffjohanw theperformanceofthek10k6andghq12toscreenforpresentstatedsmivdisordersamongdisabilityclaimants AT vanderklinkjacjl theperformanceofthek10k6andghq12toscreenforpresentstatedsmivdisordersamongdisabilityclaimants AT brouwersandra theperformanceofthek10k6andghq12toscreenforpresentstatedsmivdisordersamongdisabilityclaimants AT corneliusbertlr performanceofthek10k6andghq12toscreenforpresentstatedsmivdisordersamongdisabilityclaimants AT groothoffjohanw performanceofthek10k6andghq12toscreenforpresentstatedsmivdisordersamongdisabilityclaimants AT vanderklinkjacjl performanceofthek10k6andghq12toscreenforpresentstatedsmivdisordersamongdisabilityclaimants AT brouwersandra performanceofthek10k6andghq12toscreenforpresentstatedsmivdisordersamongdisabilityclaimants |