Cargando…

Comparison of the Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Profiles between Fast-Growing and Slow-Growing Broilers

INTRODUCTION: Growth traits are important in poultry production, however, little is known for its regulatory mechanism at epigenetic level. Therefore, in this study, we aim to compare DNA methylation profiles between fast- and slow-growing broilers in order to identify candidate genes for chicken gr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Yongsheng, Xu, Haiping, Li, Zhenhui, Zheng, Xuejuan, Jia, Xinzheng, Nie, Qinghua, Zhang, Xiquan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3575439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23441189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056411
_version_ 1782259728974348288
author Hu, Yongsheng
Xu, Haiping
Li, Zhenhui
Zheng, Xuejuan
Jia, Xinzheng
Nie, Qinghua
Zhang, Xiquan
author_facet Hu, Yongsheng
Xu, Haiping
Li, Zhenhui
Zheng, Xuejuan
Jia, Xinzheng
Nie, Qinghua
Zhang, Xiquan
author_sort Hu, Yongsheng
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Growth traits are important in poultry production, however, little is known for its regulatory mechanism at epigenetic level. Therefore, in this study, we aim to compare DNA methylation profiles between fast- and slow-growing broilers in order to identify candidate genes for chicken growth. Methylated DNA immunoprecipitation-sequencing (MeDIP-seq) was used to investigate the genome-wide DNA methylation pattern in high and low tails of Recessive White Rock (WRR(h); WRR(l)) and that of Xinhua Chickens (XH(h); XH(l)) at 7 weeks of age. The results showed that the average methylation density was the lowest in CGIs followed by promoters. Within the gene body, the methylation density of introns was higher than that of UTRs and exons. Moreover, different methylation levels were observed in different repeat types with the highest in LINE/CR1. Methylated CGIs were prominently distributed in the intergenic regions and were enriched in the size ranging 200–300 bp. In total 13,294 methylated genes were found in four samples, including 4,085 differentially methylated genes of WRR(h) Vs. WRR(l), 5,599 of XH(h) Vs. XH(l), 4,204 of WRR(h) Vs. XH(h), as well as 7,301 of WRR(l) Vs. XH(l). Moreover, 132 differentially methylated genes related to growth and metabolism were observed in both inner contrasts (WRR(h) Vs. WRR(l) and XH(h) Vs. XH(l)), whereas 129 differentially methylated genes related to growth and metabolism were found in both across-breed contrasts (WRR(h) Vs. XH(h) and WRR(l) Vs. XH(l)). Further analysis showed that overall 75 genes exhibited altered DNA methylation in all four contrasts, which included some well-known growth factors of IGF1R, FGF12, FGF14, FGF18, FGFR2, and FGFR3. In addition, we validate the MeDIP-seq results by bisulfite sequencing in some regions. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed the global DNA methylation pattern of chicken muscle, and identified candidate genes that potentially regulate muscle development at 7 weeks of age at methylation level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3575439
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35754392013-02-25 Comparison of the Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Profiles between Fast-Growing and Slow-Growing Broilers Hu, Yongsheng Xu, Haiping Li, Zhenhui Zheng, Xuejuan Jia, Xinzheng Nie, Qinghua Zhang, Xiquan PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Growth traits are important in poultry production, however, little is known for its regulatory mechanism at epigenetic level. Therefore, in this study, we aim to compare DNA methylation profiles between fast- and slow-growing broilers in order to identify candidate genes for chicken growth. Methylated DNA immunoprecipitation-sequencing (MeDIP-seq) was used to investigate the genome-wide DNA methylation pattern in high and low tails of Recessive White Rock (WRR(h); WRR(l)) and that of Xinhua Chickens (XH(h); XH(l)) at 7 weeks of age. The results showed that the average methylation density was the lowest in CGIs followed by promoters. Within the gene body, the methylation density of introns was higher than that of UTRs and exons. Moreover, different methylation levels were observed in different repeat types with the highest in LINE/CR1. Methylated CGIs were prominently distributed in the intergenic regions and were enriched in the size ranging 200–300 bp. In total 13,294 methylated genes were found in four samples, including 4,085 differentially methylated genes of WRR(h) Vs. WRR(l), 5,599 of XH(h) Vs. XH(l), 4,204 of WRR(h) Vs. XH(h), as well as 7,301 of WRR(l) Vs. XH(l). Moreover, 132 differentially methylated genes related to growth and metabolism were observed in both inner contrasts (WRR(h) Vs. WRR(l) and XH(h) Vs. XH(l)), whereas 129 differentially methylated genes related to growth and metabolism were found in both across-breed contrasts (WRR(h) Vs. XH(h) and WRR(l) Vs. XH(l)). Further analysis showed that overall 75 genes exhibited altered DNA methylation in all four contrasts, which included some well-known growth factors of IGF1R, FGF12, FGF14, FGF18, FGFR2, and FGFR3. In addition, we validate the MeDIP-seq results by bisulfite sequencing in some regions. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed the global DNA methylation pattern of chicken muscle, and identified candidate genes that potentially regulate muscle development at 7 weeks of age at methylation level. Public Library of Science 2013-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3575439/ /pubmed/23441189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056411 Text en © 2013 Hu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hu, Yongsheng
Xu, Haiping
Li, Zhenhui
Zheng, Xuejuan
Jia, Xinzheng
Nie, Qinghua
Zhang, Xiquan
Comparison of the Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Profiles between Fast-Growing and Slow-Growing Broilers
title Comparison of the Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Profiles between Fast-Growing and Slow-Growing Broilers
title_full Comparison of the Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Profiles between Fast-Growing and Slow-Growing Broilers
title_fullStr Comparison of the Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Profiles between Fast-Growing and Slow-Growing Broilers
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Profiles between Fast-Growing and Slow-Growing Broilers
title_short Comparison of the Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Profiles between Fast-Growing and Slow-Growing Broilers
title_sort comparison of the genome-wide dna methylation profiles between fast-growing and slow-growing broilers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3575439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23441189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056411
work_keys_str_mv AT huyongsheng comparisonofthegenomewidednamethylationprofilesbetweenfastgrowingandslowgrowingbroilers
AT xuhaiping comparisonofthegenomewidednamethylationprofilesbetweenfastgrowingandslowgrowingbroilers
AT lizhenhui comparisonofthegenomewidednamethylationprofilesbetweenfastgrowingandslowgrowingbroilers
AT zhengxuejuan comparisonofthegenomewidednamethylationprofilesbetweenfastgrowingandslowgrowingbroilers
AT jiaxinzheng comparisonofthegenomewidednamethylationprofilesbetweenfastgrowingandslowgrowingbroilers
AT nieqinghua comparisonofthegenomewidednamethylationprofilesbetweenfastgrowingandslowgrowingbroilers
AT zhangxiquan comparisonofthegenomewidednamethylationprofilesbetweenfastgrowingandslowgrowingbroilers