Cargando…
Humans, geometric similarity and the Froude number: is ‘‘reasonably close’’ really close enough?
Understanding locomotor energetics is imperative, because energy expended during locomotion, a requisite feature of primate subsistence, is lost to reproduction. Although metabolic energy expenditure can only be measured in extant species, using the equations of motion to calculate mechanical energy...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Company of Biologists
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3575646/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23431123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/bio.20122691 |
_version_ | 1782259763403292672 |
---|---|
author | Kramer, Patricia Ann Sylvester, Adam D. |
author_facet | Kramer, Patricia Ann Sylvester, Adam D. |
author_sort | Kramer, Patricia Ann |
collection | PubMed |
description | Understanding locomotor energetics is imperative, because energy expended during locomotion, a requisite feature of primate subsistence, is lost to reproduction. Although metabolic energy expenditure can only be measured in extant species, using the equations of motion to calculate mechanical energy expenditure offers unlimited opportunities to explore energy expenditure, particularly in extinct species on which empirical experimentation is impossible. Variability, either within or between groups, can manifest as changes in size and/or shape. Isometric scaling (or geometric similarity) requires that all dimensions change equally among all individuals, a condition that will not be met in naturally developing populations. The Froude number (Fr), with lower limb (or hindlimb) length as the characteristic length, has been used to compensate for differences in size, but does not account for differences in shape. To determine whether or not shape matters at the intraspecific level, we used a mechanical model that had properties that mimic human variation in shape. We varied crural index and limb segment circumferences (and consequently, mass and inertial parameters) among nine populations that included 19 individuals that were of different size. Our goal in the current work is to understand whether shape variation changes mechanical energy sufficiently enough to make shape a critical factor in mechanical and metabolic energy assessments. Our results reaffirm that size does not affect mass-specific mechanical cost of transport (Alexander and Jayes, 1983) among geometrically similar individuals walking at equal Fr. The known shape differences among modern humans, however, produce sufficiently large differences in internal and external work to account for much of the observed variation in metabolic energy expenditure, if mechanical energy is correlated with metabolic energy. Any species or other group that exhibits shape differences should be affected similarly to that which we establish for humans. Unfortunately, we currently do not have a simple method to control or adjust for size–shape differences in individuals that are not geometrically similar, although musculoskeletal modeling is a viable, and promising, alternative. In mouse-to-elephant comparisons, size differences could represent the largest source of morphological variation, and isometric scaling factors such as Fr can compensate for much of the variability. Within species, however, shape differences may dominate morphological variation and Fr is not designed to compensate for shape differences. In other words, those shape differences that are “reasonably close” at the mouse-to-elephant level may become grossly different for within-species energetic comparisons. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3575646 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | The Company of Biologists |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35756462013-02-21 Humans, geometric similarity and the Froude number: is ‘‘reasonably close’’ really close enough? Kramer, Patricia Ann Sylvester, Adam D. Biol Open Research Article Understanding locomotor energetics is imperative, because energy expended during locomotion, a requisite feature of primate subsistence, is lost to reproduction. Although metabolic energy expenditure can only be measured in extant species, using the equations of motion to calculate mechanical energy expenditure offers unlimited opportunities to explore energy expenditure, particularly in extinct species on which empirical experimentation is impossible. Variability, either within or between groups, can manifest as changes in size and/or shape. Isometric scaling (or geometric similarity) requires that all dimensions change equally among all individuals, a condition that will not be met in naturally developing populations. The Froude number (Fr), with lower limb (or hindlimb) length as the characteristic length, has been used to compensate for differences in size, but does not account for differences in shape. To determine whether or not shape matters at the intraspecific level, we used a mechanical model that had properties that mimic human variation in shape. We varied crural index and limb segment circumferences (and consequently, mass and inertial parameters) among nine populations that included 19 individuals that were of different size. Our goal in the current work is to understand whether shape variation changes mechanical energy sufficiently enough to make shape a critical factor in mechanical and metabolic energy assessments. Our results reaffirm that size does not affect mass-specific mechanical cost of transport (Alexander and Jayes, 1983) among geometrically similar individuals walking at equal Fr. The known shape differences among modern humans, however, produce sufficiently large differences in internal and external work to account for much of the observed variation in metabolic energy expenditure, if mechanical energy is correlated with metabolic energy. Any species or other group that exhibits shape differences should be affected similarly to that which we establish for humans. Unfortunately, we currently do not have a simple method to control or adjust for size–shape differences in individuals that are not geometrically similar, although musculoskeletal modeling is a viable, and promising, alternative. In mouse-to-elephant comparisons, size differences could represent the largest source of morphological variation, and isometric scaling factors such as Fr can compensate for much of the variability. Within species, however, shape differences may dominate morphological variation and Fr is not designed to compensate for shape differences. In other words, those shape differences that are “reasonably close” at the mouse-to-elephant level may become grossly different for within-species energetic comparisons. The Company of Biologists 2012-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3575646/ /pubmed/23431123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/bio.20122691 Text en © 2012. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kramer, Patricia Ann Sylvester, Adam D. Humans, geometric similarity and the Froude number: is ‘‘reasonably close’’ really close enough? |
title | Humans, geometric similarity and the Froude number: is ‘‘reasonably close’’ really close enough? |
title_full | Humans, geometric similarity and the Froude number: is ‘‘reasonably close’’ really close enough? |
title_fullStr | Humans, geometric similarity and the Froude number: is ‘‘reasonably close’’ really close enough? |
title_full_unstemmed | Humans, geometric similarity and the Froude number: is ‘‘reasonably close’’ really close enough? |
title_short | Humans, geometric similarity and the Froude number: is ‘‘reasonably close’’ really close enough? |
title_sort | humans, geometric similarity and the froude number: is ‘‘reasonably close’’ really close enough? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3575646/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23431123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/bio.20122691 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kramerpatriciaann humansgeometricsimilarityandthefroudenumberisreasonablyclosereallycloseenough AT sylvesteradamd humansgeometricsimilarityandthefroudenumberisreasonablyclosereallycloseenough |