Cargando…

Digital analysis of flap parameter accuracy and objective assessment of opaque bubble layer in femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK: a novel technique

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine flap parameter accuracy, extent of the opaque bubble layer, and incidence of skip lines in femtosecond laser-assisted stromal in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using the WaveLight(®) FS200 laser and optoelectronic clinical measurements. METHODS: Im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kanellopoulos, A John, Asimellis, George
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3577012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23440250
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S39644
_version_ 1782259890612338688
author Kanellopoulos, A John
Asimellis, George
author_facet Kanellopoulos, A John
Asimellis, George
author_sort Kanellopoulos, A John
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine flap parameter accuracy, extent of the opaque bubble layer, and incidence of skip lines in femtosecond laser-assisted stromal in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using the WaveLight(®) FS200 laser and optoelectronic clinical measurements. METHODS: Images from 101 flaps were automatically recorded during consecutive routine LASIK procedures performed using the WaveLight FS200 femtosecond laser and the EX500 excimer laser. Digital processing of these images was used to evaluate objectively the diameter of FS200-created flaps, by comparing planned versus achieved procedures and to evaluate the incidence and extent (area) of the opaque bubble layer. RESULTS: The intended flap diameters were between 8.00 mm and 9.50 mm. The achieved flap diameters showed extremely high precision, and were on average −0.16 ± 0.04 mm smaller for a 8.00 mm intended flap diameter, −0.12 ± 0.03 mm smaller for a 8.50 mm flap, and up +0.06 ± 0.06 mm wider for a 9.50 mm flap. With an average flap area of 72.4 mm(2), the mean area of the opaque bubble layer (4.1 ± 4.3 [range 0–14.34] mm(2)) corresponded to a 6% opaque bubble layer-to-flap area. Specifically, 80% of the femtosecond-created flaps had an essentially zero opaque bubble layer (<2.7% of the flap area). CONCLUSION: In our clinical experience, flaps created using FS200 and this novel highly objective assessment technique demonstrate both precision and reproducibility. The incidence of opaque bubble layer was minimal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3577012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35770122013-02-22 Digital analysis of flap parameter accuracy and objective assessment of opaque bubble layer in femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK: a novel technique Kanellopoulos, A John Asimellis, George Clin Ophthalmol Original Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine flap parameter accuracy, extent of the opaque bubble layer, and incidence of skip lines in femtosecond laser-assisted stromal in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using the WaveLight(®) FS200 laser and optoelectronic clinical measurements. METHODS: Images from 101 flaps were automatically recorded during consecutive routine LASIK procedures performed using the WaveLight FS200 femtosecond laser and the EX500 excimer laser. Digital processing of these images was used to evaluate objectively the diameter of FS200-created flaps, by comparing planned versus achieved procedures and to evaluate the incidence and extent (area) of the opaque bubble layer. RESULTS: The intended flap diameters were between 8.00 mm and 9.50 mm. The achieved flap diameters showed extremely high precision, and were on average −0.16 ± 0.04 mm smaller for a 8.00 mm intended flap diameter, −0.12 ± 0.03 mm smaller for a 8.50 mm flap, and up +0.06 ± 0.06 mm wider for a 9.50 mm flap. With an average flap area of 72.4 mm(2), the mean area of the opaque bubble layer (4.1 ± 4.3 [range 0–14.34] mm(2)) corresponded to a 6% opaque bubble layer-to-flap area. Specifically, 80% of the femtosecond-created flaps had an essentially zero opaque bubble layer (<2.7% of the flap area). CONCLUSION: In our clinical experience, flaps created using FS200 and this novel highly objective assessment technique demonstrate both precision and reproducibility. The incidence of opaque bubble layer was minimal. Dove Medical Press 2013 2013-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3577012/ /pubmed/23440250 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S39644 Text en © 2013 Kanellopoulos and Asimellis, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kanellopoulos, A John
Asimellis, George
Digital analysis of flap parameter accuracy and objective assessment of opaque bubble layer in femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK: a novel technique
title Digital analysis of flap parameter accuracy and objective assessment of opaque bubble layer in femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK: a novel technique
title_full Digital analysis of flap parameter accuracy and objective assessment of opaque bubble layer in femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK: a novel technique
title_fullStr Digital analysis of flap parameter accuracy and objective assessment of opaque bubble layer in femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK: a novel technique
title_full_unstemmed Digital analysis of flap parameter accuracy and objective assessment of opaque bubble layer in femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK: a novel technique
title_short Digital analysis of flap parameter accuracy and objective assessment of opaque bubble layer in femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK: a novel technique
title_sort digital analysis of flap parameter accuracy and objective assessment of opaque bubble layer in femtosecond laser-assisted lasik: a novel technique
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3577012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23440250
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S39644
work_keys_str_mv AT kanellopoulosajohn digitalanalysisofflapparameteraccuracyandobjectiveassessmentofopaquebubblelayerinfemtosecondlaserassistedlasikanoveltechnique
AT asimellisgeorge digitalanalysisofflapparameteraccuracyandobjectiveassessmentofopaquebubblelayerinfemtosecondlaserassistedlasikanoveltechnique