Cargando…
Protocol for a systematic review on the extent of non-publication of research studies and associated study characteristics
BACKGROUND: Methodological research has found that non-published studies often have different results than those that are published, a phenomenon known as publication bias. When results are not published, or are published selectively based on the direction or the strength of the findings, healthcare...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3577647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23302739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-2 |
_version_ | 1782259938357149696 |
---|---|
author | Portalupi, Susan von Elm, Erik Schmucker, Christine Lang, Britta Motschall, Edith Schwarzer, Guido Gross, Isabel T Scherer, Roberta W Bassler, Dirk Meerpohl, Joerg J |
author_facet | Portalupi, Susan von Elm, Erik Schmucker, Christine Lang, Britta Motschall, Edith Schwarzer, Guido Gross, Isabel T Scherer, Roberta W Bassler, Dirk Meerpohl, Joerg J |
author_sort | Portalupi, Susan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Methodological research has found that non-published studies often have different results than those that are published, a phenomenon known as publication bias. When results are not published, or are published selectively based on the direction or the strength of the findings, healthcare professionals and consumers of healthcare cannot base their decision-making on the full body of current evidence. METHODS: As part of the OPEN project (http://www.open-project.eu) we will conduct a systematic review with the following objectives: 1. To determine the proportion and/or rate of non-publication of studies by systematically reviewing methodological research projects that followed up a cohort of studies that a. received research ethics committee (REC) approval, b. were registered in trial registries, or c. were presented as abstracts at conferences. 2. To assess the association of study characteristics (for example, direction and/or strength of findings) with likelihood of full publication. To identify reports of relevant methodological research projects we will conduct electronic database searches, check reference lists, and contact experts. Published and unpublished projects will be included. The inclusion criteria are as follows: a. RECs: methodological research projects that examined the subsequent proportion and/or rate of publication of studies that received approval from RECs; b. Trial registries: methodological research projects that examine the subsequent proportion and/or rate of publication of studies registered in trial registries; c. Conference abstracts: methodological research projects that examine the subsequent proportion and/or rate of full publication of studies which were initially presented at conferences as abstracts. Primary outcomes: Proportion/rate of published studies; time to full publication (mean/median; cumulative publication rate by time). Secondary outcomes: Association of study characteristics with full publication. The different questions (a, b, and c) will be investigated separately. Data synthesis will involve a combination of descriptive and statistical summaries of the included methodological research projects. DISCUSSION: Results are expected to be publicly available in mid 2013. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3577647 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35776472013-02-21 Protocol for a systematic review on the extent of non-publication of research studies and associated study characteristics Portalupi, Susan von Elm, Erik Schmucker, Christine Lang, Britta Motschall, Edith Schwarzer, Guido Gross, Isabel T Scherer, Roberta W Bassler, Dirk Meerpohl, Joerg J Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Methodological research has found that non-published studies often have different results than those that are published, a phenomenon known as publication bias. When results are not published, or are published selectively based on the direction or the strength of the findings, healthcare professionals and consumers of healthcare cannot base their decision-making on the full body of current evidence. METHODS: As part of the OPEN project (http://www.open-project.eu) we will conduct a systematic review with the following objectives: 1. To determine the proportion and/or rate of non-publication of studies by systematically reviewing methodological research projects that followed up a cohort of studies that a. received research ethics committee (REC) approval, b. were registered in trial registries, or c. were presented as abstracts at conferences. 2. To assess the association of study characteristics (for example, direction and/or strength of findings) with likelihood of full publication. To identify reports of relevant methodological research projects we will conduct electronic database searches, check reference lists, and contact experts. Published and unpublished projects will be included. The inclusion criteria are as follows: a. RECs: methodological research projects that examined the subsequent proportion and/or rate of publication of studies that received approval from RECs; b. Trial registries: methodological research projects that examine the subsequent proportion and/or rate of publication of studies registered in trial registries; c. Conference abstracts: methodological research projects that examine the subsequent proportion and/or rate of full publication of studies which were initially presented at conferences as abstracts. Primary outcomes: Proportion/rate of published studies; time to full publication (mean/median; cumulative publication rate by time). Secondary outcomes: Association of study characteristics with full publication. The different questions (a, b, and c) will be investigated separately. Data synthesis will involve a combination of descriptive and statistical summaries of the included methodological research projects. DISCUSSION: Results are expected to be publicly available in mid 2013. BioMed Central 2013-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3577647/ /pubmed/23302739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-2 Text en Copyright ©2013 Portalupi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Portalupi, Susan von Elm, Erik Schmucker, Christine Lang, Britta Motschall, Edith Schwarzer, Guido Gross, Isabel T Scherer, Roberta W Bassler, Dirk Meerpohl, Joerg J Protocol for a systematic review on the extent of non-publication of research studies and associated study characteristics |
title | Protocol for a systematic review on the extent of non-publication of research studies and associated study characteristics |
title_full | Protocol for a systematic review on the extent of non-publication of research studies and associated study characteristics |
title_fullStr | Protocol for a systematic review on the extent of non-publication of research studies and associated study characteristics |
title_full_unstemmed | Protocol for a systematic review on the extent of non-publication of research studies and associated study characteristics |
title_short | Protocol for a systematic review on the extent of non-publication of research studies and associated study characteristics |
title_sort | protocol for a systematic review on the extent of non-publication of research studies and associated study characteristics |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3577647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23302739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT portalupisusan protocolforasystematicreviewontheextentofnonpublicationofresearchstudiesandassociatedstudycharacteristics AT vonelmerik protocolforasystematicreviewontheextentofnonpublicationofresearchstudiesandassociatedstudycharacteristics AT schmuckerchristine protocolforasystematicreviewontheextentofnonpublicationofresearchstudiesandassociatedstudycharacteristics AT langbritta protocolforasystematicreviewontheextentofnonpublicationofresearchstudiesandassociatedstudycharacteristics AT motschalledith protocolforasystematicreviewontheextentofnonpublicationofresearchstudiesandassociatedstudycharacteristics AT schwarzerguido protocolforasystematicreviewontheextentofnonpublicationofresearchstudiesandassociatedstudycharacteristics AT grossisabelt protocolforasystematicreviewontheextentofnonpublicationofresearchstudiesandassociatedstudycharacteristics AT schererrobertaw protocolforasystematicreviewontheextentofnonpublicationofresearchstudiesandassociatedstudycharacteristics AT basslerdirk protocolforasystematicreviewontheextentofnonpublicationofresearchstudiesandassociatedstudycharacteristics AT meerpohljoergj protocolforasystematicreviewontheextentofnonpublicationofresearchstudiesandassociatedstudycharacteristics |