Cargando…

Protocol for a systematic review on the extent of non-publication of research studies and associated study characteristics

BACKGROUND: Methodological research has found that non-published studies often have different results than those that are published, a phenomenon known as publication bias. When results are not published, or are published selectively based on the direction or the strength of the findings, healthcare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Portalupi, Susan, von Elm, Erik, Schmucker, Christine, Lang, Britta, Motschall, Edith, Schwarzer, Guido, Gross, Isabel T, Scherer, Roberta W, Bassler, Dirk, Meerpohl, Joerg J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3577647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23302739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-2
_version_ 1782259938357149696
author Portalupi, Susan
von Elm, Erik
Schmucker, Christine
Lang, Britta
Motschall, Edith
Schwarzer, Guido
Gross, Isabel T
Scherer, Roberta W
Bassler, Dirk
Meerpohl, Joerg J
author_facet Portalupi, Susan
von Elm, Erik
Schmucker, Christine
Lang, Britta
Motschall, Edith
Schwarzer, Guido
Gross, Isabel T
Scherer, Roberta W
Bassler, Dirk
Meerpohl, Joerg J
author_sort Portalupi, Susan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Methodological research has found that non-published studies often have different results than those that are published, a phenomenon known as publication bias. When results are not published, or are published selectively based on the direction or the strength of the findings, healthcare professionals and consumers of healthcare cannot base their decision-making on the full body of current evidence. METHODS: As part of the OPEN project (http://www.open-project.eu) we will conduct a systematic review with the following objectives: 1. To determine the proportion and/or rate of non-publication of studies by systematically reviewing methodological research projects that followed up a cohort of studies that a. received research ethics committee (REC) approval, b. were registered in trial registries, or c. were presented as abstracts at conferences. 2. To assess the association of study characteristics (for example, direction and/or strength of findings) with likelihood of full publication. To identify reports of relevant methodological research projects we will conduct electronic database searches, check reference lists, and contact experts. Published and unpublished projects will be included. The inclusion criteria are as follows: a. RECs: methodological research projects that examined the subsequent proportion and/or rate of publication of studies that received approval from RECs; b. Trial registries: methodological research projects that examine the subsequent proportion and/or rate of publication of studies registered in trial registries; c. Conference abstracts: methodological research projects that examine the subsequent proportion and/or rate of full publication of studies which were initially presented at conferences as abstracts. Primary outcomes: Proportion/rate of published studies; time to full publication (mean/median; cumulative publication rate by time). Secondary outcomes: Association of study characteristics with full publication. The different questions (a, b, and c) will be investigated separately. Data synthesis will involve a combination of descriptive and statistical summaries of the included methodological research projects. DISCUSSION: Results are expected to be publicly available in mid 2013.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3577647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35776472013-02-21 Protocol for a systematic review on the extent of non-publication of research studies and associated study characteristics Portalupi, Susan von Elm, Erik Schmucker, Christine Lang, Britta Motschall, Edith Schwarzer, Guido Gross, Isabel T Scherer, Roberta W Bassler, Dirk Meerpohl, Joerg J Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Methodological research has found that non-published studies often have different results than those that are published, a phenomenon known as publication bias. When results are not published, or are published selectively based on the direction or the strength of the findings, healthcare professionals and consumers of healthcare cannot base their decision-making on the full body of current evidence. METHODS: As part of the OPEN project (http://www.open-project.eu) we will conduct a systematic review with the following objectives: 1. To determine the proportion and/or rate of non-publication of studies by systematically reviewing methodological research projects that followed up a cohort of studies that a. received research ethics committee (REC) approval, b. were registered in trial registries, or c. were presented as abstracts at conferences. 2. To assess the association of study characteristics (for example, direction and/or strength of findings) with likelihood of full publication. To identify reports of relevant methodological research projects we will conduct electronic database searches, check reference lists, and contact experts. Published and unpublished projects will be included. The inclusion criteria are as follows: a. RECs: methodological research projects that examined the subsequent proportion and/or rate of publication of studies that received approval from RECs; b. Trial registries: methodological research projects that examine the subsequent proportion and/or rate of publication of studies registered in trial registries; c. Conference abstracts: methodological research projects that examine the subsequent proportion and/or rate of full publication of studies which were initially presented at conferences as abstracts. Primary outcomes: Proportion/rate of published studies; time to full publication (mean/median; cumulative publication rate by time). Secondary outcomes: Association of study characteristics with full publication. The different questions (a, b, and c) will be investigated separately. Data synthesis will involve a combination of descriptive and statistical summaries of the included methodological research projects. DISCUSSION: Results are expected to be publicly available in mid 2013. BioMed Central 2013-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3577647/ /pubmed/23302739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-2 Text en Copyright ©2013 Portalupi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Protocol
Portalupi, Susan
von Elm, Erik
Schmucker, Christine
Lang, Britta
Motschall, Edith
Schwarzer, Guido
Gross, Isabel T
Scherer, Roberta W
Bassler, Dirk
Meerpohl, Joerg J
Protocol for a systematic review on the extent of non-publication of research studies and associated study characteristics
title Protocol for a systematic review on the extent of non-publication of research studies and associated study characteristics
title_full Protocol for a systematic review on the extent of non-publication of research studies and associated study characteristics
title_fullStr Protocol for a systematic review on the extent of non-publication of research studies and associated study characteristics
title_full_unstemmed Protocol for a systematic review on the extent of non-publication of research studies and associated study characteristics
title_short Protocol for a systematic review on the extent of non-publication of research studies and associated study characteristics
title_sort protocol for a systematic review on the extent of non-publication of research studies and associated study characteristics
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3577647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23302739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-2
work_keys_str_mv AT portalupisusan protocolforasystematicreviewontheextentofnonpublicationofresearchstudiesandassociatedstudycharacteristics
AT vonelmerik protocolforasystematicreviewontheextentofnonpublicationofresearchstudiesandassociatedstudycharacteristics
AT schmuckerchristine protocolforasystematicreviewontheextentofnonpublicationofresearchstudiesandassociatedstudycharacteristics
AT langbritta protocolforasystematicreviewontheextentofnonpublicationofresearchstudiesandassociatedstudycharacteristics
AT motschalledith protocolforasystematicreviewontheextentofnonpublicationofresearchstudiesandassociatedstudycharacteristics
AT schwarzerguido protocolforasystematicreviewontheextentofnonpublicationofresearchstudiesandassociatedstudycharacteristics
AT grossisabelt protocolforasystematicreviewontheextentofnonpublicationofresearchstudiesandassociatedstudycharacteristics
AT schererrobertaw protocolforasystematicreviewontheextentofnonpublicationofresearchstudiesandassociatedstudycharacteristics
AT basslerdirk protocolforasystematicreviewontheextentofnonpublicationofresearchstudiesandassociatedstudycharacteristics
AT meerpohljoergj protocolforasystematicreviewontheextentofnonpublicationofresearchstudiesandassociatedstudycharacteristics