Cargando…

Performance of the 2010 Classification Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Literature Review and a Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2010 classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and the abstr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sakellariou, Garifallia, Scirè, Carlo Alberto, Zambon, Antonella, Caporali, Roberto, Montecucco, Carlomaurizio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3577909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23437156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056528
_version_ 1782260002023538688
author Sakellariou, Garifallia
Scirè, Carlo Alberto
Zambon, Antonella
Caporali, Roberto
Montecucco, Carlomaurizio
author_facet Sakellariou, Garifallia
Scirè, Carlo Alberto
Zambon, Antonella
Caporali, Roberto
Montecucco, Carlomaurizio
author_sort Sakellariou, Garifallia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2010 classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and the abstracts of the ACR and EULAR meetings (2010–2012) were searched for original articles or abstracts with the following inclusion criteria: 1) recent onset arthritis, with at least one swollen joint and no alternative diagnosis; 2) the ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria as index test; 3) the prescription of methotrexate (MTX) or disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) at any time during follow-up as reference standard. Data were pooled using the bivariate model. Three meta-analyses were performed with MTX (primary analysis), DMARDs or their combination (secondary analyses) as reference standard. Heterogeneity was formally tested and explored performing an influence analysis. RESULTS: The search identified 1,277 references. Six full papers and 4 abstracts met the inclusion criteria. With MTX as reference standard, sensitivity (95% confidence interval, CI) was 0.80 (0.74,0.85), specificity 0.61 (0.56,0.67), positive likelihood ratio (LR) 2.11 (1.92,2.32), negative LR 0.31 (0.25,0.38) and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 6.74 (5.49,8.28). Using DMARDs as reference standard, sensitivity was 0.73 (0.64,0.80), specificity was 0.74 (0.68,0.79), LR+2.85 (2.53,3.22), LR− 0.35 (0.27,0.45) and DOR 8.03 (6.4,10.09). Using the combination of MTX and DMARDs as reference standard, intermediate results were obtained. The influence analysis detected one potentially influential study. However, its exclusion from the meta-analysis did not have a clinically relevant impact on the results. CONCLUSIONS: The new classification criteria have good sensitivity, lower specificity and an overall moderate diagnostic accuracy. These results confirm that the criteria have classificative and not diagnostic function.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3577909
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35779092013-02-22 Performance of the 2010 Classification Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Literature Review and a Meta-Analysis Sakellariou, Garifallia Scirè, Carlo Alberto Zambon, Antonella Caporali, Roberto Montecucco, Carlomaurizio PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2010 classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and the abstracts of the ACR and EULAR meetings (2010–2012) were searched for original articles or abstracts with the following inclusion criteria: 1) recent onset arthritis, with at least one swollen joint and no alternative diagnosis; 2) the ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria as index test; 3) the prescription of methotrexate (MTX) or disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) at any time during follow-up as reference standard. Data were pooled using the bivariate model. Three meta-analyses were performed with MTX (primary analysis), DMARDs or their combination (secondary analyses) as reference standard. Heterogeneity was formally tested and explored performing an influence analysis. RESULTS: The search identified 1,277 references. Six full papers and 4 abstracts met the inclusion criteria. With MTX as reference standard, sensitivity (95% confidence interval, CI) was 0.80 (0.74,0.85), specificity 0.61 (0.56,0.67), positive likelihood ratio (LR) 2.11 (1.92,2.32), negative LR 0.31 (0.25,0.38) and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 6.74 (5.49,8.28). Using DMARDs as reference standard, sensitivity was 0.73 (0.64,0.80), specificity was 0.74 (0.68,0.79), LR+2.85 (2.53,3.22), LR− 0.35 (0.27,0.45) and DOR 8.03 (6.4,10.09). Using the combination of MTX and DMARDs as reference standard, intermediate results were obtained. The influence analysis detected one potentially influential study. However, its exclusion from the meta-analysis did not have a clinically relevant impact on the results. CONCLUSIONS: The new classification criteria have good sensitivity, lower specificity and an overall moderate diagnostic accuracy. These results confirm that the criteria have classificative and not diagnostic function. Public Library of Science 2013-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3577909/ /pubmed/23437156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056528 Text en © 2013 Sakellariou et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sakellariou, Garifallia
Scirè, Carlo Alberto
Zambon, Antonella
Caporali, Roberto
Montecucco, Carlomaurizio
Performance of the 2010 Classification Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Literature Review and a Meta-Analysis
title Performance of the 2010 Classification Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Literature Review and a Meta-Analysis
title_full Performance of the 2010 Classification Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Literature Review and a Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Performance of the 2010 Classification Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Literature Review and a Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Performance of the 2010 Classification Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Literature Review and a Meta-Analysis
title_short Performance of the 2010 Classification Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Literature Review and a Meta-Analysis
title_sort performance of the 2010 classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3577909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23437156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056528
work_keys_str_mv AT sakellariougarifallia performanceofthe2010classificationcriteriaforrheumatoidarthritisasystematicliteraturereviewandametaanalysis
AT scirecarloalberto performanceofthe2010classificationcriteriaforrheumatoidarthritisasystematicliteraturereviewandametaanalysis
AT zambonantonella performanceofthe2010classificationcriteriaforrheumatoidarthritisasystematicliteraturereviewandametaanalysis
AT caporaliroberto performanceofthe2010classificationcriteriaforrheumatoidarthritisasystematicliteraturereviewandametaanalysis
AT montecuccocarlomaurizio performanceofthe2010classificationcriteriaforrheumatoidarthritisasystematicliteraturereviewandametaanalysis