Cargando…

Evidence-based control of canine rabies: a critical review of population density reduction

1. Control measures for canine rabies include vaccination and reducing population density through culling or sterilization. 2. Despite the evidence that culling fails to control canine rabies, efforts to reduce canine population density continue in many parts of the world. 3. The rationale for reduc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morters, Michelle K, Restif, Olivier, Hampson, Katie, Cleaveland, Sarah, Wood, James L N, Conlan, Andrew J K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3579231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23004351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.02033.x
_version_ 1782260106558177280
author Morters, Michelle K
Restif, Olivier
Hampson, Katie
Cleaveland, Sarah
Wood, James L N
Conlan, Andrew J K
author_facet Morters, Michelle K
Restif, Olivier
Hampson, Katie
Cleaveland, Sarah
Wood, James L N
Conlan, Andrew J K
author_sort Morters, Michelle K
collection PubMed
description 1. Control measures for canine rabies include vaccination and reducing population density through culling or sterilization. 2. Despite the evidence that culling fails to control canine rabies, efforts to reduce canine population density continue in many parts of the world. 3. The rationale for reducing population density is that rabies transmission is density-dependent, with disease incidence increasing directly with host density. This may be based, in part, on an incomplete interpretation of historical field data for wildlife, with important implications for disease control in dog populations. Here, we examine historical and more recent field data, in the context of host ecology and epidemic theory, to understand better the role of density in rabies transmission and the reasons why culling fails to control rabies. 4. We conclude that the relationship between host density, disease incidence and other factors is complex and may differ between species. This highlights the difficulties of interpreting field data and the constraints of extrapolations between species, particularly in terms of control policies. 5. We also propose that the complex interactions between dogs and people may render culling of free-roaming dogs ineffective irrespective of the relationship between host density and disease incidence. 6. We conclude that vaccination is the most effective means to control rabies in all species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3579231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35792312013-02-25 Evidence-based control of canine rabies: a critical review of population density reduction Morters, Michelle K Restif, Olivier Hampson, Katie Cleaveland, Sarah Wood, James L N Conlan, Andrew J K J Anim Ecol Reviews 1. Control measures for canine rabies include vaccination and reducing population density through culling or sterilization. 2. Despite the evidence that culling fails to control canine rabies, efforts to reduce canine population density continue in many parts of the world. 3. The rationale for reducing population density is that rabies transmission is density-dependent, with disease incidence increasing directly with host density. This may be based, in part, on an incomplete interpretation of historical field data for wildlife, with important implications for disease control in dog populations. Here, we examine historical and more recent field data, in the context of host ecology and epidemic theory, to understand better the role of density in rabies transmission and the reasons why culling fails to control rabies. 4. We conclude that the relationship between host density, disease incidence and other factors is complex and may differ between species. This highlights the difficulties of interpreting field data and the constraints of extrapolations between species, particularly in terms of control policies. 5. We also propose that the complex interactions between dogs and people may render culling of free-roaming dogs ineffective irrespective of the relationship between host density and disease incidence. 6. We conclude that vaccination is the most effective means to control rabies in all species. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013-01 2012-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3579231/ /pubmed/23004351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.02033.x Text en © 2013 British Ecological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Reviews
Morters, Michelle K
Restif, Olivier
Hampson, Katie
Cleaveland, Sarah
Wood, James L N
Conlan, Andrew J K
Evidence-based control of canine rabies: a critical review of population density reduction
title Evidence-based control of canine rabies: a critical review of population density reduction
title_full Evidence-based control of canine rabies: a critical review of population density reduction
title_fullStr Evidence-based control of canine rabies: a critical review of population density reduction
title_full_unstemmed Evidence-based control of canine rabies: a critical review of population density reduction
title_short Evidence-based control of canine rabies: a critical review of population density reduction
title_sort evidence-based control of canine rabies: a critical review of population density reduction
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3579231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23004351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.02033.x
work_keys_str_mv AT mortersmichellek evidencebasedcontrolofcaninerabiesacriticalreviewofpopulationdensityreduction
AT restifolivier evidencebasedcontrolofcaninerabiesacriticalreviewofpopulationdensityreduction
AT hampsonkatie evidencebasedcontrolofcaninerabiesacriticalreviewofpopulationdensityreduction
AT cleavelandsarah evidencebasedcontrolofcaninerabiesacriticalreviewofpopulationdensityreduction
AT woodjamesln evidencebasedcontrolofcaninerabiesacriticalreviewofpopulationdensityreduction
AT conlanandrewjk evidencebasedcontrolofcaninerabiesacriticalreviewofpopulationdensityreduction